Md79

[Mummy Emerita @happybird_y]

@NaturalEngland Reading your denials you are very clearly trying to ‘educate’ landowners as to which stock they should have. Ponies must not be included in stock. Your ‘tailored advice to support business’ is very clearly understood!!!! The people demand ponies.

[itchythekiller @MatthewHitchmo3]

@NaturalEngland 'Not recommending'

No just setting it up so farmers have no real world choice by to cull them.

Then you will point your finger at the farmers and think the public will be fooled.

[Un-Commoner 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Loquacian]

Why do you left wing authoritarians always want to murder animals?

In Australia they shot all the dogs and puppies in that kennel over COVID, now you want to slay a bunch of harmless tiny horses.

There's something wrong with these people...

Remember the squirrel in new York?

There's quite the list now...

[Fraser Wakerley @FWakerley22607]

@NaturalEngland No,
You require a significant reduction in animals and you have grouped ponies with farm animals.
It will be the ponies who are reduced
You are very stupid people

[LAsky @LAsky66]

@NaturalEngland You actually say that you're going to hugely reduce the numbers, so it's not a false claim is it?

[Bergehetzer @TU_144_]

@NaturalEngland It's the usual mission creep nonsense until the end goal has been achieved, defund natural England

[Dartmoor Hill Pony Assoc @ponykeepersDTMR]

@NaturalEngland @TonyJuniper page 1 of 4

[Julian O'Donovan @JulianOD]

@NaturalEngland We’ve all read the detailed rebuttal. You’re indulging in sophistry, half truths and dishonesty.
We see you.

[The Chaos Ledger @thechaosledger]

@NaturalEngland But you've made demands that necessitate a cull.
Like a drunk driver who claims they didn't mean to run down the pedestrian, they just wanted to get home.

[Steve Loftus @LoftusSteve]

"We are not culling the Ponies, we can't do that... We're simply changing the rules so farmers have no choice but to cull them. That's not the same"

[Darren Grimes @darrengrimes]

Gutpreet Digwa, the brother of Vickrum Digwa, who rang 999 and told police they were the victims of a racist attack.

By a white man that had been stabbed multiple times.

So officers handcuffed Henry. The dying victim. Treated as the criminal.

It was a lie. Every word of it. Even the mother admitted perverting the course of justice.

The brother who made that call? Never charged. Never even referred to the CPS.

And they still swear blind two-tier justice is a myth.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Rupert Lowe's Mass Deportations Blueprint Is the Most Serious Document in British Politics. It Has One Unanswered Question.

Restore Britain's mass deportations policy paper is not what its critics say it is. It is not a fantasy document or a manifesto for ethnic cleansing. It is a serious, legally considered, operationally detailed blueprint for removing every person living in Britain illegally, estimated at between 1.8 and 2 million people. It identifies the real obstacles honestly, the ECHR, the Human Rights Act, the Equality Act, the asylum system as currently constituted, and proposes specific mechanisms for dismantling each of them. Anyone who dismisses it without reading it is not engaging with the argument. They are avoiding it.

The diagnosis is correct. Britain has between 1.8 and 2 million people living here without legal status, confirmed by the Thames Water sewage methodology and the Home Office's own figures. The removal rate for illegal Channel arrivals stands at four percent. The legal architecture is the primary obstacle, not political will, not operational capacity. The paper is right about all of that, and it deserves credit for saying so plainly when every other party is still pretending the problem is the gangs rather than the system that processes their customers and keeps them here.

The operational logic is also sounder than critics acknowledge. A hostile environment, mandatory right to work checks, biometric banking requirements, severe penalties for employers and landlords, voluntary returns incentivised ahead of forced removals, is exactly the mechanism that works. The US reduced border crossings from 1.6 million to under 240,000 within months using comparable tools. Hungary processes 47 asylum applications in six months. The paper draws on real precedent, not wishful thinking.

Where the delivery question remains open is the constitutional demolition required before any of this can begin. Withdrawing from the ECHR. Repealing the Human Rights Act. Passing a Great Clarification Act to reassert parliamentary sovereignty over the courts. Each of those is achievable in principle through a parliament with a sufficient majority and the will to use it. Each would also trigger a legal, political and institutional firestorm of a scale Britain has not seen in modern times. Every legal charity, every NGO, every charity funded to shift public attitudes on migration through children's television and national newspapers, every activist network and left-leaning institution in the country would mobilise simultaneously. Behind them, the red-green alliance of hard-left organisations and Islamist sympathisers that fills Britain's streets on weekends numbers in the hundreds of thousands. Their opposition has never been limited to the ballot box. International pressure would be immediate. The courts would be flooded with injunctions before the first removal flight left the ground.

That is not an argument against attempting it. It is an argument for preparing the political ground before the legislative attempt is made. A government that moves to repeal the Human Rights Act without a consolidated electoral mandate, without public opinion hardened by years of honest argument, and without having first demonstrated it can enforce existing law, will find the attempt buried under procedural challenges before it gets started. The permanent state is expert at using legal process to exhaust political will. Rwanda proved that.

The achievable version of this is not constitutional demolition. It is law enforcement. Close the border. Remove those here illegally using existing powers pushed to their limits. Build the mandate for the harder steps from the credibility earned by the easier ones. Restore's supporters are right that the political class has failed them for thirty years. The question the paper has not yet answered is what happens in the room when the lawyers arrive.

[Eva Vlaardingerbroek @EvaVlaar]

Exactly. A step in the right direction, but only the adoption of the @SaveEuropeAct would get the job done.

Sign now: https://t.co/h2FixvZnjK

[Reform UK @reformparty_uk]

Under a Reform UK government migrants in social housing will be given 3 months to find private accommodation or face being deported.

We will prioritise veterans and long-term local residents. ✅

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

We face a future where our kids will never get a council house or social housing if they fall on hard times.
In London, some social housing areas are 60-70% foreign born.

No other country allows this - reset needed.

Nothing racist or extreme, it’s common sense.

[VoxPopuli @vpopulimedia]

🇨🇦 ISIS sex slave survivor CANCELLED by Canadian school over ISLAMOPHOBIA FEARS.

Nadia Murad was scheduled to sit with students about her upcoming book, but the Toronto District School Board has cancelled her because the book would be OFFENSIVE to Muslims and “foster Islamophobia.”

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

These are up all over Rochdale.

We started arresting them for raping little girls and now they want to genocide us.

[Benonwine @benonwine]

Labour says a further statement on VPN’s will be made in July, with restrictions now being discussed following the social media ban.

This should concern everyone, not just parents or teenagers.

Millions of ordinary people use VPNs to protect their privacy, secure their personal data, and browse the internet without being tracked. The idea that the government is now looking at restricting access to them is a step in the wrong direction.

History teaches us that free societies encourage people to think, question, and challenge those in power. Governments should never be afraid of an informed public.

As the saying goes: “When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”

Privacy is not a crime. Questioning those in power is not extremism. Freedom, once surrendered, is rarely won back without a fight. 🇬🇧

[Inevitable West @Inevitablewest]

Dallas, USA, has been covered in St. Georges flags for the World Cup.

Unlike in Britain, they won't be removed!

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Oh BRILLIANT! I love these interviews.

Stop what you are doing and watch London’s Deputy Mayor! … it is truly staggering that this role pays £148,000 a year and THIS was the best person for the job

And also … we really are this bad 🤡