Zach

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@barstoolsports LFG Hagel!

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@DarrigoMelanie This is just a blatant lie.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@EndWokeness disgrace

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@BasedMikeLee No

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@JohnCornyn @LeaderJohnThune @elonmusk @Tesla @SenJohnBarrasso Why are we not passing the Save Act, it’s gone through the House twice. Make it happen. As reconciliation bill or by ending the filibuster. This is the only way to win the midterms.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@thef35 solved the icing problem

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

This is a step in the right direction for sure. But forced deportations alone are just not cutting it. We're only getting about 600,000 people out a year, and that's just 2.4 million over four years out of 10-30 million undocumented folks. It's expensive and doesn't make a dent.
Something that is working is self-deportation. Almost 2 million people have left voluntarily with some cash and a 10-year ban instead of lifetime ban. It's way cheaper and more effective. But what we really need to go after the big corporations hiring them. Kaizen Asiedu’s post below talks about a company Asplundh Tree Experts—they got slapped with a $95 million fine, but that's peanuts compared to their revenue. We should be jailing executives, not just fining them. That's how you stop the problem at the source. If we want really get results, we need a smarter strategy, not just a show.

https://t.co/EN2gQCSrDc

[Kaizen D. Asiedu @thatsKAIZEN]

ICE is arresting ~1,000 illegal immigrants a day.

In 4 years, that’s only 1.5m people out of 10-30m.

Self-deportation is working.

Forced deportation is expensive theater.

To get real results, we should put CEOs of corporations who employ illegal immigrants in handcuffs.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@GeekTalksGaming @Maebe_A_Girl @DesireeAmerica4 Walmart is the biggest employer in this country, employing over 1 and half million people. Definitely not my definition of a shitty company.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@GamefiCrusher @KobeissiLetter your from Thailand

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@GoodByeXNow @Bearbones24 @alex_avoigt @SenEricSchmitt Fair point—legally, it’s still just speech, not action, regardless of how objectionable the content may be. The distinction holds under both U.S. and UK law, where intent and context determine legality, not personal disagreement.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@MilitaryCooI hero

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@reallyPheelz @TheFlagGuy_ @medeabenjamin Sure why not? Neville Singham’s founded it and he’s contributed millions since its inception, all the numbers point to it beign influenced by a poster boy for the ccp.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@alliharvard only in the UK

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@AryePulliNFL concussion

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@roundrockpolice Smart

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@StandUpForTrmp A.

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@GuntherEagleman absolutely

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

yes, definitely. Self-driving cars have to drive against complicated/unpredictable city chaos—the fury flies planned routes in open sky with a human probably always watching just in case. “Almost” means 90-99% confidence in a system built for this. No joystick babysitting needed like in a classical UAV.

[Michelle Maxwell ™ @MichelleMaxwell]

🚨Breaking Update🚨:

This young man summarizes what is really going on regarding this Shutdown. Do you agree with him?

[Zach @Zach_Greif]

@matt_vanswol @HarmeetKDhillon Please tell me a lawsuits been filed already. This is ridiculous.