I’m truly sick and tired of Chainlink’s marketing style. Year after year they keep talking about trillions and hundreds of trillions as if they actually have anything to do with it. But when I go check their actual on-chain fee revenue, I’m honestly shocked.
They never talk about the $LINK token, yet they have a crowd of fanatics pushing conspiracy theories and endless optimism about $LINK just to lure in new retail investors. This is how they avoid legal risk while still pumping the $LINK token to retail without having to do it themselves.
Everyone should be careful with this group and stay away from buying $LINK until Chainlink Labs becomes fully transparent about everything
Any single person telling you to hold $LINK is a danger to your wealth. It is a shitcoin designed to siphon money from your pocket and transfer it to the founder
$LINK on October 5, 2021 with a fraction of the “partnerships” and integrations: $27
$LINK today with “institutional adoption”: $14
You’re not holding anything that will guarantee you a slice of the global banking system. People much smarter than you with infinite resources have determined the token is not worth much at all, or they would’ve already beat you to the table. The same people that bought $ETH for $1 (hi there), and $BTC for $10, are not buying $LINK at $14 because they think it’s going to $1000. They’re not buying, the bankers aren’t buying, and $LINK is a digital debit card for Sergey and co. That’s why it’s $14 in 2026, almost a decade after ICO. Use your brain, you’re not early to this game.
@DerJbrand@cryptodotnews I’m honestly starting to think he’s the biggest grifter in crypto. He just spouts “news” to pump the price a bit then he dumps loads of tokens
@cryptodotnews Sergey Nazarov has been saying quite a lot for the last 6 years. Saying this. Saying that. Saying the other. Why should anyone still give fuck with a $LINK price just north of $10?
Over the summer, Henry Nowak's final moments were broadcast around the world. He was just eighteen, and when the police reached him on a street in Southampton he would have believed that help had come. He told them he had been stabbed and could not breathe, and they handcuffed and arrested him.
I met Henry's family in June, and that meeting has stayed with me ever since. There is still much more to be said about how the police failed Henry, and about how they went on failing his family and loved ones right up until the conviction.
The day after we met, I wrote to the then Prime Minister, Keir Starmer asking for an independent, rapid review of the police response, the decisions that followed, and the role of the police watchdog. I didn't publish that letter at the time, because I hoped the Government would do the right thing and I wanted to work with them quietly to make that happen. Downing Street's answer was to wait for the existing processes to run their course.
Since then, Keir Starmer has gone and Andy Burnham has taken his place, yet still there is no review. There was little mention of victims in the PM’s speech earlier this week. Henry's family have waited long enough, so today I'm publishing my letter. Andy Burnham should order the review now, and I stand ready to work with him to set it up, as I offered in June.
I haven't forgotten Henry, and I won't let this Government forget him either.