We have raised three independent, amazing, intelligent, highly-motivated, super-capable, young adults.
Our strategy can easily replicate--we have helped other parents do the same.
This thread-of-threads will have some of my advice links.
This is one of the most mind-blowing things you’ll EVER see.
(And I swear to G-D if this post only gets a few thousand views on X, then X is simply not fit for purpose for anything. Because this is something everyone should see and be blown away by)
You’re watching a laser beam move in real time… at 2 billion frames per second.
Light only travels about 15 cm (6 inches) in each frame. That’s why you can actually see the beam crawl across the room, bounce off the mirrors, and come back.
Now watch carefully when the camera position changes…
The light going away from the camera suddenly looks slow.
The light coming toward the camera looks almost instant.
It looks like the speed of light is changing.
It’s not.
You’re seeing the finite speed of light itself. The camera is literally recording the PAST at different moments depending on how far the light has to travel to reach the sensor.
This isn’t CGI.
This isn’t a simulation.
This is a homemade camera filming actual photons.
Full credit, and huge respect, to @Alpha__Phoenix Alpha Phoenix Channel
A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed.
The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair.
He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way.
Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not.
The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason.
It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours.
One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.
It would be helpful if we had some intermediate immigration statuses to combat this. Like:
-sure you get amnesty but no remittances, no family preference for immigration, you have to give DNA and fingerprints to law enforcement, and we can instantly deport you if you’re convicted
Extraordinary moment: all 49,000 appear to be young and male. A sign that the vast movement of migrants towards the comfort democracies is just starting and will change the world in the coming years
If you were asked what planet this is, what would you say? Olympus Mons on Mars? The red soil and lack of vegetation would certainly give the impression it's not of this world.
However, it's not on Mars. It's actually in a place you wouldn't expect it to be.
1/3
@dilanesper@Cobbsthecobbler I think this is more different than not, because the other things were SOCIAL acceptance and this is not.
“We should treat trans women as women in most social contexts, unless there’s a real reason for sex separation” would be a different ball of wax.
@StephenESachs@ProfRobAnderson@senatorshoshana How much of this is a failure to control for the fact that bar exam and LSAT allow for accommodations such as extra time, while “real life” does not?
Butcher block is great but soapstone is AMAZING. yes it scratches/chips but that just makes it look better. No stains, no burns, and you can just sand it when you sell.
Dark (of course.) one large cavern had a moving ceiling which was thousands (millions?) of bats.
Sacrificed skeletons all over—old and young.
Giant cave spider which of course you could only see w your lights pointed their way.
Was one of the best experiences of my youth.
I was there 28 years ago.
It was hardly open to the public.
Long hike in to a very sparse camp. Small group of three people. You had to swim into the cave. Sketchy headlights (far from modern LEDs,) no safety gear other than a helmet; one guide.
Man, this stuff is awesome.
Sadly my MA town lives by the “stretch code” and I can only build in brick if I am willing to super-insulate the exterior or interior, basically by wrapping one or both in foam.
Which defeats the point.
Depth, you can't fake it. It's the depth of traditional structural masonry that allows so many lovely possibilities to emerge in a design. Imagine trying to achieve this in veneer!
The amusing thing is that there IS a higher margin but it’s mostly on things like candy bars and individual-sized stuff (single cans of soda, etc.) that are the subject of much hand-wringing.
If you are appointing judges, for example, the demographic sample for analysis should be “qualified experienced lawyers.”
Note that this is often WILDLY different from the general population demographics, especially wrt certain minority groups.
This is entirely true but is anathema to Mandan supporters.
Why?
Because widespread application of this principle would gut their favored preferences.
For example:
Jews make up only 11-12% of NYC's population, but roughly 50% of NYC lawyers.
If you are forming a large committee of LAWYERS in NEW YORK CITY and not a single Jew makes the cut, that is not a coincidence; that is targeted exclusion.
@DaWoo90670022@MostlyPeaceful@JackPosobiec But heat is formed from the compression caused by the shock wave. Here it is room-temp air expanding so the expansion front itself is not going to be hot, I don’t think? Though of course it will heat up what it hits.
Am I wrong?
@_MauriPro has a terrible tactic:
A customer-facing AI system that *insists it is human*
If you chat you get “Nate Villamar, product advisor” who is an AI.
AI is standard for CS chat, though it is still not disclosed that you are talking to (or emailing) an AI
But….
1/3
2/3
Chat-Nate will refer you to a phone number. At which point you get Phone-Nate.
Phone-Nate is the same AI. Same repetitive responses. Same inability to answer complex or multipart statements.
PHONE-NATE DENIES HE IS AN AI!!