The lack of courage in the ‘west’ to hold Islamists to account, both morally and literally, ensures a swift path to the lowest common denominator.
If it isn't clear to you what that is, take a look at October 7th. That is the lowest common denominator.
Race to the bottom?
@notgrubles Maybe it's merely a familiarity component for bitcoin.
Get used to a platform that gives access to both
The value though would always accrue to the ‘stable’ aspect, rather than the underlying ETH, right?
Why would value accrue to ETH when it is the USDT etc people are seeking?
@TheAliceSmith I remember a call for people under 25 to not be classed as adults when being prosecuted under law.
We also hear them ask for 16yr olds to be able to vote.
Make it make sense 🙃
A Muslim man from Gaza openly admitted that the Palestinian desire to kill Jews is stronger than their will to live or build a better future for their children.
This is what the media in the West ignores about the people of Gaza because it damages the false image of Islam as a religion of peace.
According to Islam, murdering Jews as human sacrifices for Allah guarantees Muslims a place in paradise — along with virgin sex slaves for eternity.
The Western media deliberately hides these statements because they destroy the carefully constructed narrative that the conflict is about “occupation” or “land.” Once you understand that most Muslims in Gaza and Ramallah view the murder of Jews and Christians as a religious obligation rather than a political dispute, the entire framework of “two states for two peoples” collapses.
A 14-year-old Palestinian boy was paid 100 shekels by Fatah’s Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades to wear a suicide belt and blow himself up next to Jewish women and children.
He was caught by IDF forces just before he could detonate it.
Even Arab leaders admit it.
Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.
Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.
Ok, so let us set that aside.
Now watch this.
In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.
Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.
He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.
The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.
This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.
When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.
The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.
This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.
If you value the truth, please share.
@SeanMcc244878@Whatsthehapp5@Irlheff@newpeteV1 Al-Baqarah 2:191 "Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from where they drove you out; persecution is worse than killing."
@SeanMcc244878@Whatsthehapp5@Irlheff@newpeteV1 At-Tawbah 9:29 "Fight those who do not believe in God or the Last Day, nor comply with what God and His messenger have forbidden, nor embrace the religion of truth from among those given the Scripture, until they pay the tax and are subdued."
Douglas Murray:
"Ya no existe la solución de dos Estados. A los palestinos se les concedió un Estado de facto en 2005, cuando se expulsó a todos los judíos de Gaza. Tuvieron 18 años. ¿Qué hicieron? Cohetes, guerra, el 7 de octubre."
Tiene toda la razón.