🚨BREAKING🚨: NASA is deliberately erasing UFOs and other anomalies from the photo record of the Apollo Moon Program. On the far side of the moon, something that looks like a buried nuclear reactor is radiating at twenty times the normal heat with concentrations of thorium and uranium NASA can't explain. And on the surface sit formations that resemble ancient ruins, too geometrically precise to have formed naturally, above caverns far more vast than the entirety of Manhattan.
Theoretical physicist Maaneli Derakhshani (@MaxDerakhshani) , a Utrecht PhD working on lunar anomalies, discovered that NASA holds two versions of the same Apollo 14 photograph: in one, a blue orb hangs in the sky above astronaut Ed Mitchell, and in the other it has been redacted out. He has found the same across other Apollo missions, and Ken Johnston Sr., a former NASA consultant and pilot who worked with the astronauts, says he was ordered to destroy early negatives showing things that weren't supposed to be there.
The Department of War is now investigating an Apollo 17 frame Derakhshani had flagged a year earlier, in which three lights above the lunar surface appear to be a single physical object.
NASA was built to keep this all quiet. Its founding charter placed it under the Pentagon and gave it legal cover to hide anything touching national security from Congress and the public, and a report it commissioned soon after spelled out the plan directly: if artifacts ever turned up on the Moon, bury the discovery. Trump has now gone further and designated NASA an intelligence agency outright. The men who walked there have hinted at what they saw, objects trailing their craft, lights that weren't debris, even a telepathic warning to stay away that came just before the missions stopped for good.
In 1994 NASA and the Pentagon ran a joint mission to the Moon called Clementine, sold to the public as a survey of lunar minerals. Its own deputy manager says on the record it was a reconnaissance operation, sent to photograph the far side and find out who was building bases up there.
The moon is not what we think it is. Full conversation live now.
“ADHD is not a disorder of not knowing what to do. It’s a disorder of not doing what you already know.”
Dr. Russell Barkley just delivered one of the clearest explanations of ADHD I’ve ever heard.
He says the brain can be split in two: the back part acquires knowledge, the front part (the executive system) uses it. ADHD acts like a meat cleaver that severs the two.
You already have the skills and information other people your age have. You just can’t apply them when it counts.
That’s why life becomes an endless series of last-minute crises. You’re time-blind — you can only deal with what’s right in front of you. The further away a goal or deadline is, the less real it feels.
The solution isn’t teaching more skills. It’s changing the environment at the exact point where the problem occurs — the “point of performance.”
It’s a game-changing way to understand why traditional approaches often fail.
Nearly 30 years later, the Varginha, Brazil UAP incident continues to raise more questions than answers.
After meeting with people connected to the case, I requested records from the FBI and CIA.
The American people deserve transparency
The government's most successful deception wasn't convincing you UFOs don't exist.
It was convincing you that EVEN asking about them makes you a fool.
That's not an accident. It's a psyop, and it's been running for decades. I break it all down in my Daily Mail exclusive:
https://t.co/r3UYI7JHlr
For most of my life the government's line on UFOs was simple...
Nothing to see here.
Then objects flew over one of our air bases for 17 straight days.
And we evacuated a squadron of F-22s from our own airspace.
Nothing to see here?
Yeah…nah.
Here’s what I think is happening instead.
I haven’t wanted to say this, but there is a problem with organized Skepticism even more than conspiracy theories. My claim is that from hard evidence NOT ONE of the following is an extraordinary claim:
The CIA not only gathers intelligence but kills people, violates rights, gaslights and evades scrutiny and oversight.
The U.S. hides bioweapons programs.
The U.S. engages in regime change through charity and aid programs.
We in the U.S. medically experiment on our own citizens without consent.
We run drugs.
The DOJ and FBI are actively and flagrantly obstructing justice.
Putin easily kills people outside Russia.
We conspire and use academics for sheepskin washing our dirty work.
U.S. newspapers actively avoid reporting stories about which the U.S. population is desperate for information. They also carry extremely non neutral biases.
We actively conspired to hide open and obvious presidential dementia. And by extension, there are massive conspiracies at every level below that one. At a mind boggling level.
There are Special Access programs that are about real and/or fake NHI/UFOs
Etc.
————
The last thing we need is skeptics telling us the bar for such conspiracies and/or governmental accountability requires extraordinary evidence.
Somehow the skeptics have it totally wrong.
After Watergate, Iran-Contra, COVID, Church/Pike committees, etc. these are no longer extraordinary claims to raise. They are ordinary claims.
I have no idea whether Lindsay Graham died of natural causes. But I can tell you the difference between a skeptic and a scientist looking at the claim.
A skeptic’s first move is to lurch for the budding conspiracy and try to pull the idea of foul play off the table first and then to require a mountain of evidence to consider such a thing.
A scientist firmly grabs the skeptic’s hand and forces him to put the hypothesis back on the table and says “Uh, you’re not in charge here. There’s a history…and I’m going to need to see something other than reference to null hypotheses, William of Occam and Carl Sagan…because that’s not how science and investigation works.”
Time for extra scientific skepticism to die I think. Covert operations and conspiracies are difficult enough to document as it is.
We don’t need skeptics as self appointed referees.
This is HUGE news.
PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients. He did so using one of the most creative approaches in astronomy I have ever seen: by analysing pre-Sputnik photographic plates from a German telescope known to suffer from severe optical distortions (aberrations), he demonstrated that the transients appear on these plates and exhibit the same optical distortions as the stars themselves. They are slightly narrower and sharper than the stars, consistent with brief flashes.
This is a crucial result. It shows that the transient light passed through the telescope optics, meaning the transients originate from real objects producing light, rather than from plate defects or cosmic-ray contamination that hit the plate. Dr Busko has also shown that the transients cluster spatially and are associated with periods close to nuclear tests. See the example of the triple transient with optical comas.
This is the greatest gift. Congratulations, Ivo.
I'm happy beyond belief.
Read Ivo Busko's paper: https://t.co/6CT58wnsKJ
@planethunter56 It is liberating to share something that most people do not want to "believe in" or "learn in order to understand"—to evolve one's consciousness—because that requires true understanding...
Thank you to @disclosurefound for the generous gift to Vangaurd and helping whistleblowers and their families in the interim until we get true disclosure, legislation, and restitution. I'm greatful attorneys on their behalf are available for future whistleblowers to be protected to serve their nation and Vangaurd is here to help them before and after for what this life is.
Vangaurd has been three plus years in the making for Matt and I, starting under a pine tree with me freaking out about ticks lol, knowing what we know and seeing the trauma of whistleblowers and experiencers, their families and friends.
I became a whistleblower March 3, 2023 not because of "UFOs" but concern for the safety of people involved with the subject. Since then, I have tried my best to be a good human, friend, coworker, and to work to help people.
Morality is something you do expecting nothing in return. There is no paycheck, no likes, no retweets, no twitter spaces. You throw it on and say "I have your back, what do you need?" Leadership is giving public praise, and criticism privately. Something I hope humans remember for the future.
@JeremyCorbell and @g_knapp interviewed @SunOfAbramelin about ODNI crimes committed against whistleblowers this very year. Weeks later, James Erdman III literally said Church committees are needed under oath in front of the U.S. Senate due to what CIA and ODNI did to whistleblowers. As of this time, "UFO" hearings are yet to be held in front of the U.S. Senate.
"Disclosure" is a once in a species event. It comes with all of the issues humans have. Money, power, crime, technology, and the more despicable aspects of humanity many of you reading this know.
I never wanted to be known. I don't think many of the whistleblowers did. We did this because those of us in uniform swore to die for THE Constitution. Some of us meant it, some didn't. We believe we have to speak for others who cant speak for themselves, a.k.a morality.
Vangaurd hopefully will let these same people know we have your back, and we are here for you to come forward should you risk it all. A step not taken lightly and they have seen what has been done to all of us. Anyone coming forward now is a hero having watched everything that has been done to the other whistleblowers and their families.
"I'm No Hero, But I Served With Them"
- Gary Howard
Peace and love to all and thank you again to @disclosurefound and everyone supporting whistleblowers, the truth, and the constitution.
You are all my heros and I/we couldn't do it without you.
Peace and love on this beautiful pre July 4th day.
Love yall.
Disclosure may be arriving with one condition: don’t ask too much about what came before it.
Why do Avi Loeb and Hal Puthoff sound so protective of the past?
That may be the real story.
#UAP#UFO
I came in expecting to record an episode with just Rep. Burlison, but of course, I excitedly said yes when he asked me to sit in on his discussion with Loeb and Puthoff.
This, for me, was a very valuable opportunity to try to press on some questions regarding AAWSAP vs. AATIP, the DHS Kona Blue PSAP, some claims echoed by Puthoff's contemporaries that the Legacy Program reverse engineering initiative was halted in 1989 due to lack of progress, the absence of FFRDC and GOCO in Dr. Puthoff and his contemporaries' Legacy Program outline, and more.
I feel as though I need another 4 or so hours MINIMUM to really come away with satisfying answers, as I reckon Dr. Puthoff has quite a few secrets and was far closer to the Legacy Programs than he will ever publicly disclose!
That being said, regardless of disagreements I have with Dr. Puthoff or questions I have regarding his involvement in the topic, he and his wife were an absolute pleasure to speak with before the episode; very kind, gracious, and generous with their time.
Now, following the episode, I did press Dr. Puthoff on some allegations I have spoken about before - that the UFO material transferred through the Kona Blue DHS PSAP from Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company and its VP, Dr. Jim Ryder, to the AAWSAP/BAASS includes hull structure, bulkhead, general materials, etc., from the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash retrieval. Leaving my conversation with Puthoff, I am much more confident in that assertion....
While that particular set of materials from 1953's Kingman may have been quite tricky to exploit, thus Lockheed wished to bring in some minds outside the traditional Legacy infrastructure, I still vehemently disagree with the narrative that little to no progress has been made in exploiting, deriving, or reverse-engineering UFO materials.
Thank you @RepEricBurlison for having all of us, thank you Dr. Puthoff for discussing some critical topics on AAWSAP/AATIP, and thank you @ProfAviLoeb for answering some much-needed questions on the Council and Governance Board!