@WTFAWD2022@AnnMroz I hate that The Mail/The Times are taking a simple human error and twisting it into a bunch of lies, trashing the school's good reputation, for the sole purpose of finding some content they can peddle as Woke to outrage their readers. Shame on them and their shoddy journalism.
@myheathcliff2@Ashworth101 @DavidPattie @AnnMroz I'm sorry but I'm absolutely positive that you're 100% wrong. My daughter's report from this exact school had plenty of 'she' pronouns in it but one teacher had forgotten to change the pronoun. Just a human error which the school very quickly apologised for at the time.
@TalkTervosaurus@AnnMroz Just one teacher didn't change the pronoun on my daughter's report. I know that generic national-curriculum linked statements are commonly used in reports. Not ideal, but teachers have a lot more pressure on them these days and I think they generally do an amazing job.
@Ashworth101 @DavidPattie @AnnMroz I'm a parent at this school and the article is nonsense. The principal sent an email as soon as the reports went out to explain there had been some technical issues with generic statement banks. The school does not refer to it's students as 'they'. It's just Daily Mail piffle.
@GCSchoolTeacher @DavidPattie @AnnMroz I'm a parent at this school and the article is nonsense. The principal sent an email as soon as the reports went out to explain there had been some technical issues with generic statement banks. The school does not refer to it's students as 'they'. It's just Daily Mail piffle.
@AnnMroz Furthermore, my daughter's report only had one use of the personal pronoun 'they'. The rest of the time she was referred to a she, so the article and this @AnnMroz tweet are actually also untrue, and are just trying to drag a good school's name through the dirt for nothing.
@AnnMroz My child goes to this school. As soon as the reports went out the principal sent an email to explain that there had been some issues with the use of generic statement banks and that any use of the pronoun 'they' was in error and it would be resolved. This story is utter nonsense.
@Liberty49623091 @Sollarbone None of this stuff is new. And none of it proves domestic or sexual violence by JD. I can see by your profile pic you are an AH fan so your view will not be changed. I am not a huge JD fan, and I actually believed AH at first. I'm ashamed of that now I have seen the lies she told
@Liberty49623091 @Sollarbone They decided she defamed him with actual malice. I'm sorry but the were multiple recordings of AH admitting to punching him, chopping his finger off, starting fights, throwing vases, pots & pans at him etc. is literally proof that she was an abuser. She also shat on his bed.
@JeanCorcoran@PaulMcCartney@glastonbury I think, words-wise, they were both horrible to each other so the language hasn't taken centre-stage. It's more about JD being a victim of domestic violence whilst falsely being accused of being the perpetrator which has caused the outpouring of support
@JeanCorcoran@PaulMcCartney@glastonbury Agreed. The texts were grim. They weren't used as evidence of domestic abuse though as JD sent them to friends and were not seen by AH. The language by BOTH of them in arguments was vile. However the case was about domestic & sexual violence which AH was found to have lied about.
@JeanCorcoran@PaulMcCartney@glastonbury Paul McCartney was also accused of domestic violence by Heather Mills. I'm assuming you believe Paul in this instance otherwise you wouldn't be watching him at Glastonbury.
@JeanCorcoran@PaulMcCartney@glastonbury Oh good grief. Perhaps you are not very up to date with what has happened since this and all the additional evidence that was presented in the latest trial not to mention countless new witness testimonies in support of JD and AH proven to have lied.
@jonfra64 @Sollarbone Hi, yes I'l realise that. But I think if Paul thought JD was guilty of domestic violence then he probably wouldn't have used it? (Well, I hope so!) So indirectly I think this is a way of showing support for JD as Paul sees no reason to remove it. What do you think?