Every single person who streams and drives should be perma banned. They keep getting second, third, fourth chances - this isn't "oh I watched a copyright movie on stream" kind of shit. Cars are dangerous machines and if someone dies, the lawsuit against twitch will kill the site.
The Xbox news just gets worse & worse every day.
Arkane
Undead Labs
Ninja Theory
Compulsion Games
Double Fine
All above studios could be shut down this upcoming week with Marvel's Blade, Senua & State of Decay 3 all in limbo & possibly cancelled.
A tyrannical act to entrench establishment stranglehold on information available to youth. It’s got nothing to do with porn but used the “Tumblr and Discord will turn my kid into a troon” hysteria to crush a hammer on freedom of youth and also begin banning anonymity online
THEY PASSED IT ANYWAY - and it’s even worse than we thought.
House just rammed through the "KIDS" Act (H.R. 7757) 267-117, with 47 not voting.
Many of us have been warning about these ID verification laws disguised as "for the children." This is how you eventually get people to comply with biometric facial scans, which eventually leads to us needing a scan every time we want to access the internet.
They’ve been telling us their plans for a while now, but so many brush it off “that will never happen in America.” Well, it just did, and this is only the beginning.
Over 90 child advocacy groups begged Congress to vote NO. Why? This House version strips out key protections for eating disorders, depression, addiction, and s×icide making it weaker than the Senate version they already passed!
Proof it has nothing to do with actually protecting children. It’s just another way to remove the tiny bit of privacy we have left.
The House just passed the KIDS Act (267-117): a Trojan horse sneaking federal online ID checks into "kids safety" bills.
Platforms must "know or should have known" if you're a minor or face liability. That forces age verification, ID checks, and tracking for everyone.
Meanwhile, the Senate version of KOSA keeps the dangerous "duty of care" provision that would force platforms to censor broad categories of protected speech to avoid liability.
There's a huge rift: Senate authors called the House bill dead on arrival. Neither chamber protects freedom...one pushes ID checks, the other pushes algorithmic control.
Gridlock between two evils is currently the only thing stopping a full assault on online anonymity and speech.
https://t.co/Loqg8somQc
7. It guts Section 230 without touching it.🚨🚨🚨🚨
The bill says it does not change Section 230. It does not need to. It creates duties of care, safety design requirements, audit obligations, and reporting mandates that Section 230 does not cover. Section 230 protects platforms from liability for what users say. This bill creates liability for how platforms are designed and operated. It achieves the same result as repealing Section 230 without the political fight platforms become legally responsible for their architecture, which forces them to monitor, restrict, and pre-approve everything.
8. It funnels every legal challenge into one federal court.
Every constitutional challenge to this bill goes to the US District Court for the District of Columbia. One court. One venue. One set of judges. No company in California, no civil liberties group in New York, no platform in Texas can challenge this law in their home circuit. This prevents multiple federal courts from issuing injunctions and ensures the government fights on home turf every time.
THE BOTTOM LINE:🚨🚨🚨
This is not a child safety bill. It is an internet control bill wearing a child safety costume.
Children are the emotional weapon. The regulatory infrastructure is the weapon itself.
It uses the politically untouchable cause of child protection to:
• Build a national digital identity verification system
• Hand the FTC regulatory control over the internet
• Force more data collection on children
• Protect Big Tech monopolies from competition
• Strip parental rights through school contracts
• Destroy encryption through compliance pressure
• Kill Section 230 through regulatory obligations
• Stack the legal deck by concentrating challenges in one court
🚨🚨🚨🚨 This bill does not protect children. It builds a system to verify, track, and regulate every person who uses the internet and uses children as the excuse to build it.
**This bill is a fucking Trojan Horse. Period.**🚨🚨🚨
Its a federal surveillance and control system over the entire internet that will be used on adults.🚨🚨🚨
Using child safety. As cover 🚨🚨
1. It builds a national digital ID system through the back door.🚨⚠️
The bill says three times it does not require age verification. That is a lie. Every single protection in the bill only triggers when a platform "knows or should have known" a user is a minor. No platform can prove it did not know without checking. The bill creates a legal trap where the only safe path is to card everyone. Once that infrastructure is built, it does not get turned off when you turn 18. The same system that checks if you are 16 today checks if you are 21 tomorrow. The same database that verifies a teenager verifies a gun buyer, a voter, a patient. This is a national digital identity system built under the cover of child protection.
⚠️⚠️2. It hands the FTC the keys to the internet.**
The FTC gets authority over age verification standards, content safety audits, data broker registries, social media research, chatbot rules, gaming platform safety, educational resources, advertising regulations, and enforcement of the entire act. The FTC becomes the operational regulator of the American internet. This is the largest federal power grab over online platforms in a decade, buried inside a children's safety bill where nobody will vote against it.
⚠️⚠️3. It forces companies to spy on children to prove they are protecting them.**
The audit requirements mandate platforms track and report how many minors use their service, how long they spend, what safety features they use, what reports they file, and what personal information is collected. The government orders companies to gather detailed statistics about children under the banner of protecting them. A bill that claims to protect children's privacy mandates the collection of more data about children than has ever been collected before.
🚨🚨4. It shields Big Tech and crushes small competitors.
The data broker rules exempt Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft because their product is advertising services, not data sales. The companies that collect the most minor data in the world are exempt from the data broker regulations. The compliance costs annual third-party audits, safety tools, parental controls, reporting systems, age verification infrastructure cost millions. Big tech absorbs this. Small platforms die. The bill consolidates market power among the largest tech monopolies while pretending to regulate them.
5. It cuts parents out through school contracts.**🚨🚨🚨
Educational technology companies can collect children's personal information without parental consent if they have a written agreement with a school. The school consents. The parent is never told. Google Classroom, Microsoft Teams, Canvas—they all get direct access to student data through school district contracts. This is a corporate pipeline of minor data with zero parental involvement, written into a bill that claims to empower parents.
6. It kills encryption through regulatory pressure. 🚨🚨🚨
The bill says it does not require breaking encryption. Another lie. It requires platforms to provide messaging controls, content filtering, and safety features for minors. On an end-to-end encrypted platform, you cannot filter content you cannot see. The only way to comply is to either break encryption for minor accounts or disable it entirely. The bill creates regulatory pressure to destroy encryption while claiming to protect it. Once encryption is weakened for minors, the vulnerability exists for everyone.
You evil ghoul bills like this allow Big Tech companies the reason to collect more sensitive user data for the purposes of complying for age verification.
When the data breaches happens you and the other inbred party won’t ever punish them and instead leave users in danger.
I have the proper solution for this that would be better.
>Parents do what they're supposed to do aka watch their kids instead of a mobile device
Lazy fucking Parents ruining the internet for the entire world
This dude isn't even trying to hide the fact the "KIDS Act" is about censorship and going after people that disagree with him btw
Heres some posts just from this year.
These are the people in the Government pushing this but refuse to advocate or release the full Epstein Files
This video is a funny compilation of people unboxing vacuum-sealed "bed-in-a-box" mattresses 😂🛏️. The moment the seal is cut, the mattress explodes open super fast 💥 and catches everyone off guard.
People end up shocked, losing their balance, and what should be a simple task turns into total chaos and hilarious fails 🤣😬