I am a Microsoft security architect.
In 1994, researchers discovered RC4 was fundamentally broken.
We made it the default cipher in Windows anyway.
By 2000, every machine on Earth was running it.
We called it "battle-tested."
Technically true. It lost every battle.
In 2013, more researchers confirmed it was still broken.
We published a knowledge base article thanking them for their passion.
In 2015, the entire industry formally deprecated it.
We kept it enabled by default.
Compatibility is more important than security.
Security is just compatibility with not being hacked.
Hospitals ran their patient records through it.
Banks authenticated their transactions with it.
Fortune 500 companies trusted their crown jewels to it.
The Ascension breach happened. 5.6 million patient records. 140 hospitals offline.
Ransomware walked through our cipher like it wasn't there.
It basically wasn't.
Senator Wyden called it "gross cybersecurity negligence."
He demanded an FTC investigation.
We released a statement thanking him for his continued partnership.
After 26 years of careful consideration, we've made a decision.
We're going to disable RC4 by default.
In mid-2026.
We're giving everyone 18 months notice.
Because we believe in thoughtful transitions.
We've been thoughtfully transitioning since the Clinton administration.
Two Clintons could have run for president in the time we've been "evaluating options."
Some things are just hard to kill off.
Like a legacy cipher.
Or institutional momentum.
Or the phrase "we take security seriously."
We do take it seriously.
We just don't take it urgently.
Urgency is for startups.
We're a mature organization.
We mature our vulnerabilities like fine wine.
26 years.
That's not negligence.
That's commitment.
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
@AlexChrisRich@isjanosnba@MiamiHEAT Last year is last year, this year is cooking heat my friend, enjoy full perform from Celtics best team most titles ok