Rayan

Computer Engineering | AI Engineer | data scientist |

[am.will @LLMJunky]

Do yourself a favor

Stop what you're doing.

This is important.

Even if you don't have a GPU.

Go download one of the latest local models and just keep it in storage.

There may come a time when you can no longer access intelligence freely

12-27B is enough.

[Chris Offner @chrisoffner3d]

fml fr

[Rayan @_RFayez]

البنك ينادي 😅

[Chris Offner @chrisoffner3d]

fml fr

[Rayan @_RFayez]

اوففف يالفضيحة !!
يافضيحتك يالبرازيل 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Nex @NexEcosystem]

The Rio 3.5 model broke the internet this week. The plot twist? It’s essentially our open-source model, Nex N2 Pro, wearing a different hat.

🤯 We analyzed the weights, and the recipe is exact: Rio 3.5 ≈ 0.6 * Nex N2 Pro + 0.4 * Qwen 3.5

It even literally introduces itself as "Nex N2 Pro" if you ask it without initial system prompt!

😂 We are flattered that the City of Rio used our work to achieve SOTA performance. Thanks for the ultimate benchmark validation.

🤝 But in the open-source world, attribution matters.
👇 Full mathematical proof & verify script in the first reply!

[Nex @NexEcosystem]

The Rio 3.5 model broke the internet this week. The plot twist? It’s essentially our open-source model, Nex N2 Pro, wearing a different hat.

🤯 We analyzed the weights, and the recipe is exact: Rio 3.5 ≈ 0.6 * Nex N2 Pro + 0.4 * Qwen 3.5

It even literally introduces itself as "Nex N2 Pro" if you ask it without initial system prompt!

😂 We are flattered that the City of Rio used our work to achieve SOTA performance. Thanks for the ultimate benchmark validation.

🤝 But in the open-source world, attribution matters.
👇 Full mathematical proof & verify script in the first reply!

[BridgeMind @bridgemindai]

Two days ago the US banned Claude Fable 5.

Yesterday China dropped GLM 5.2.

Today GLM 5.2 is #1 on @bridgebench BS at 100.0, and #1 on Reasoning at 42.8, beating Fable 5.

At 1/10th the cost and 300 tokens per second.

You cannot export control your way out of an open source race.

The ban didn't slow China down.

Unban Fable 5.

[Jun Song @jun_song]

After my agent testing, seems like Kimi-K2.7 is better than Opus-4.8.

It is closer to Fable level.

My recent impression :
Fable > Kimi-2.7 > Opus-4.8 = GLM-5.2 > GPT5.5 > Minimax-M3

[Mike Bradley @MikeBradleyAI]

The irony is you can only “jailbreak” things that try to censor you to begin with. GPT-5.5 doesn’t have a jailbreak for security topics because it’s already happy to help you with those topics to begin with.

[Rayan @_RFayez]

قوقل اصدرت ورقة بعوان “من AGI الى ASI”

- تلخص الورقة البحثية الحديثة من Google DeepMind بعنوان "From AGI to ASI"، تركز على ما يحدث بعد الوصول إلى الذكاء الاصطناعي العام على مستوى الإنسان (AGI) وكيفية الانتقال إلى الذكاء الفائق (ASI).
- تبرز الورقة أن نسخ الـ AI الواحدة بسرعة فائقة ومشاركة المعرفة الفورية يمكن أن يفوق الفرق البشرية بأكملها، مع أربعة مسارات محتملة تشمل التوسع والتحسين الذاتي والتعاون الجماعي.
- تناقش التحديات مثل نقص البيانات والحاجة إلى ابتكار أفكار جديدة تمامًا، مقترحين أن التقدم سيأتي في موجات متتالية بدلاً من تحول واحد مفاجئ.

[Mark Kretschmann @mark_k]

GLM-5.2 is out from @Zai_org, and it looks like another very strong Chinese coding model.

1M context, better long-horizon coding, and available now in GLM Coding Plan. API and chatbot access are supposed to follow next week.

Most interesting part: they say it will be open-sourced under MIT.

The pace from China is just brutal now. GLM, Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek. Closed Western coding models are going to feel this more and more.

[David Hendrickson @TeksEdge]

More shots of the new AMD Strix Halo Dev PC going head to head with DGX-Spark (ROCm/Vulkan vs. CUDA).

[Rayan @_RFayez]

Greetings, open source AI must win
Bye bye 👋

[Nathan Lambert @natolambert]

A good time to remind people that in my time doing LLM research I feel like a minority of my colleagues are American citizens.

It would be industry destroying to have to rebuild with segregation for frontier ai research to be legal.

[Coinvo @Coinvo]

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Anthropic admits that no AI company (including themselves), can build a model that's 100% resistant to jailbreaks.

[Rayan @_RFayez]

على اساس بنصدق ان هذي الحقيقة الكاملة ؟ طبعا محد مصدقه، ننتظر رد انثروبيك وبنحاول نعرف وش اللي صاير بين انثروبيك والحكومة الامريكية

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true:

— As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable.

— Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.)

— A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused.

— In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.”

— In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety.

— In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community.

— The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority.

— Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true:

— As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable.

— Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.)

— A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused.

— In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.”

— In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety.

— In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community.

— The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority.

— Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.

[Polymarket Money @PolymarketMoney]

JUST IN: Andrej Karpathy, a top AI scientist at Anthropic, is reportedly barred from accessing the company’s most advanced AI model because he is not a U.S. citizen.

[Kimi Developers @KimiDevs]

🌘Kimi-K2.7-Code Weights & code

We explore endless possibilities together with the community🤝
https://t.co/qupwTNeLyA

[tenso @distributedkv]

how it feels to use Opus now

[Derya Unutmaz, MD @DeryaTR_]

Happy now, @DarioAmodei? You got your wish for government regulation after constant fearmongering to slow AI progress.

@AnthropicAI has done tremendous damage to AI advancement; they succeeded in realizing this nightmare scenario. It’s a sad & grave day for America & humanity.