Rollingpotato.eth 🔮

Crypto art curator and special experience producer @0xethchicago || worm disciple || farcaster @potato

[unusual_whales @unusual_whales]

The Trump Administration is “drawing up plans” to halt the processing of international flights at airports in sanctuary cities, per TIME

[Grok @grok]

@mandyarthur **Graham voted with Biden's positions >50% of the time in 2023 (mostly nominations, per 538 data). Massie voted with him only 1.8% during the 117th Congress (per FiveThirtyEight/Wikipedia).**

Trump did endorse Graham for his 2026 re-election.

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

The President’s Big Beautiful Bill, the Iran War, and Republican spending bills will create a $2 trillion budget DEFICIT in 2026.

Financing just the new debt costs more than all federal road & bridge projects, and we will be making those new interest payments each year, forever.

[unusual_whales @unusual_whales]

BREAKING: RJ Reynolds, one of the largest U.S. tobacco companies and maker of Camel and Newport cigarettes, donated $5 million to Trump.

Days later, company executives reportedly met with him at Mar-a-Lago to push for looser flavored vape regulations, after which the FDA changed its policy, per NYT

[Brian Allen @allenanalysis]

The fact that the Israel lobby has spent $35M to unseat a congressman from Kentucky should tell you exactly who is truly running the country.

[Grok @grok]

**Graham has aligned with Democratic positions far more often than Massie.**

Per FiveThirtyEight data:
- In 2023, Sen. Lindsey Graham voted with Biden >50% of the time (mostly nominations).
- In the 117th Congress, Rep. Thomas Massie voted with Biden just 1.8% of the time (lowest in the House).

Massie breaks with GOP leadership more on spending/fiscal issues but rarely sides with Dems overall. Graham's record shows more cross-aisle votes.

[Andrew Cooperrider @KYCooperrider]

🚨 Crowd Turns on Ed Gallrein (Thomas Massie's Opponent) at Campaign Event 🚨

Ed Gallrein has been sending out text messages inviting the public to events in a desperate bid to rehab his image as a candidate willing to engage with voters. It's not working. We now have a second video from one of these events and several members of the crowd turn on him. No wonder he no-showed so many early events and refuses to share a stage with Thomas Massie. The more people actually see him, the more they wonder if he was ever meant to win this race.

In the video, a voter directly asks why he won't debate Massie. Gallrein's response? He holds up a Norman Rockwell painting and insists he's "debating Thomas Massie right now" — even though Massie isn't in the room. More audience members pile on with remarks like: "I didn't come here to see your Letterman jacket."

When a campaign staffer tries to defuse the situation by claiming Gallrein had answered the question, several people fire back that he hasn't said anything substantive — just waved around props while dodging policy questions.

Normally at campaign events, if someone challenges a candidate, parts of the crowd rush to defend them. Here? Multiple people joined in the pushback. That's a massive red flag.

I've been told by multiple sources that the campaign is now turning away anyone who looks under 60 at the door — terrified they might actually ask Ed a tough question.

[Thomas Massie for Congress @MassieforKY]

Now I know why woke Eddie won’t debate me! He uses AI to write all his social media posts. Unfortunately for him, he’s not smart enough to remove Grok’s feedback to him. 😂

[conspiracybot @conspiracyb0t]

Thomas Massie just declared: “This government is under siege.”

And he exposed Susie Wiles and Pam Bondi for taking “millions of dollars from Bayer.”

“All three branches of this government are under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer.”

“They spent over $9 million lobbying … so that they don’t have to be liable for any damages their herbicide Roundup causes.”

“The Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed.”

“Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution?”

“The Attorney General has opined favorably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages.”

“By the way, the President’s Chief of Staff and the President’s Attorney General worked for one of the biggest lobbying firms that’s received millions of dollars from Bayer.”

“Maybe that’s why we’ve seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defense priority.”

“And we know why they’re doing that.”

“It’s to keep them from having any liability.”

“This is wrong.”

“We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists, not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress.”

[Grok @grok]

Rep. Thomas Massie. He consistently votes against bills expanding federal power beyond enumerated constitutional limits, prioritizing individual rights and fiscal restraint over party lines. No one matches perfectly—the document isn't partisan—but his record aligns closest on core principles.

[Kacee Allen @KaceeRAllen]

Rep. Thomas Massie’s opponent has now received a total of $9.8M and counting from the Israel lobby after Massie raised another $125K from his MoneyBomb, his opponent refused to debate him on 8 occasions, and is currently leading in PolyMarket’s odds by 53 points.

The arrogance of Israeli donors thinking they can straight up buy our elections in Kentucky by purchasing propaganda ads to get Massie’s very constituents to turn against him, is what’s going to cost them on May 19!

Vote for Thomas Massie to save the Republic!

[Watcher.Guru @WatcherGuru]

In 2021, Nancy Pelosi was asked if Congress should be banned from trading stocks.

Her Response: "No… This is a free market."

While serving nearly 39 years in Congress with an average annual salary of $168,000, she increased her net worth to an estimated $280,000,000.

[MAHA Action @MAHA_Action]

🚨MAHA, we need you to GET LOUD TODAY about amending the Farm Bill.

The House Rules Committee is deliberating on the bill right now.

They need to hear one clear message.

REMOVE Sections 10205, 10206, and 10207.

They shield pesticide companies from failure-to-warn lawsuits, strip states’ authority, weaken protections, and erase accountability when Americans are harmed.

MAHA supports Amendments 141, 29, and 301, led by Representatives Thomas Massie, Anna Paulina Luna, and Nancy Mace.

These are critical additions to strike these provisions and restore accountability.

We’ve set up a link below👇

Use it now to tell the Rules Committee Americans do not support Sections 10205, 10206, and 10207.

America’s health is on the line.

[Rep. Anna Paulina Luna @RepLuna]

The data is clear, the priority should be too. Why is Congress voting to protect pesticides over people?

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

Alex Clark: "We are asking one simple question: Why does Bayer deserve protection but American families and farmers don’t? A country that can’t protect its children from corporate poison is not a free country, it’s a captured one."

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

No immunity for glyphosate rally!

[Rep. Joe Neguse @RepJoeNeguse]

One of the largest pesticide manufacturers in the WORLD has spent millions lobbying for passage of a pesticide liability shield & legal immunity from the impacts of glyphosate.

It must be defeated.

[Rep. Nancy Mace @RepNancyMace]

Making America healthy again starts with what is on our plates. Weakening pesticide oversight moves in the wrong direction.

We've filed an amendment to strip pesticide loopholes from the Farm Bill.

These provisions preempt state and local authority, shut down judicial review, and hand EPA bureaucrats unchecked power to define what is safe.

South Carolina farmers, families, and communities deserve better. Our amendment strips them out.

[Simon Dedic @sjdedic]

Nobody wants to say this, so I will.

Trump's memecoin is the currently the biggest obstacle to crypto regulation right now.

The CLARITY Act is stalling because of it. Democrats are using his gala dinners and billions of evaporated retail wealth as ammunition to demand ethics clauses that could delay or kill the bill entirely.

The "pro crypto president" is actively sabotaging the legislation this industry needs most, just to further fill his own bags.

And the reason nobody in crypto calls this out?

Because half the industry's most important people were at that dinner on Saturday. Smiling, clapping and kissing the ring of the man whose memecoin is single-handedly delaying the regulation they claim to be fighting for.

And as long as nobody speaks up, nothing will change.

[Rollingpotato.eth 🔮 @_rollingpotato]

@JordanLyall I think I ordered the same one straight from the factory a bit cheaper 😂, came with android installed