Cheating on his spouse is deplorable. That being said, 90% of his employees want him here. 90% of his investors want him here. Everyone agrees that this infidelity doesn't really change any of his leadership decisions.
So why is the economist so desperate to try to get him out?
If Nvidia’s board had yet to find the courage to sack him, fresh allegations of another affair—this time with a direct report—will surely help https://t.co/pTeryK2qjK
If you grew up in the 1950s or 1960s and went to any sort of religious schooling, your primary introduction to this archetype would have been through a strict nun.
It was pervasive during that time.
Agreed that it doesn't exist in that form today, but there was a time when it was dominant.
@ryebreadbye@neontaster It's telling that most of the people who are commenting against AI aren't software developers and have never developed anything.
Fascists want you to accept AI for "just 10 lines of coding" (unproven) because then next week you will excuse 15 lines, then 30, and the temperature keeps rising until you claim that AI is already here and there's nothing we can do.
Stop being spineless and stand up NOW.
@shivjam@Hankroyd You are wrong.
Code generation use LLMs with is a type of generative AI.
Whether you’re making an image, writing code or an email, the “AI” is generative AI.
@aerendian@PenitusVox While true, the culture and institutions of our time means that you’ll rarely run into the conservative version of this archetype.
An anecdotal story here
There was a sports team for a university that wanted to build an app for managing their recruitment and rooster, and none of the solutions on the market could do what they wanted it to. So I decided to build it entirely with AI.
I'm a software developer with 12 years of experience in the field, and I fully expected this thing to just tip over at some point. The codebase grew and grew. There was a lot of dumb shit, like too many comments and a lot of unnecessary tests.
That being said, I launched this thing two months ago. It got through the busiest part of the season and was sending out something like 500 messages a day, and it did not fail once. All the issues with the app were due to poor product decisions, mostly on my part.
Around that time, I was talking to another startup that was using AI only on the side, not as their main building engine. As I attempted to use their app, I tried to sign up, and the pages would not load.
People call the code slop, but as somebody who has reviewed many, many, many applications, the stuff the AI is putting out is just an order of magnitude better. It's not even close.
But the problem is that you can apply that basically to every sin, right? If I murdered somebody and then the priest started asking me about all the grisly details, that would be imprudent as well. The problem is, she calls out sexual sin specifically. As if it were an exception to the other sins, which it is not.
Of course they're praising him. He doesn't actually believe that Jesus had a bodily resurrection, at least from the research I've been able to look up. To him, it's more of a metaphor, which is what the atheists have always wanted to believe.
The perfect Christian is someone who's not Christian in any sense of the word.
Normalize game devs being transparent about AI used
There's absolutely no reason why you shouldn't
And there's absolutely no reason why you as a customer shouldn't know if AI is being used in the content or not
I won't support your game, but I am glad that you allow me to be an informed potential buyer, good on you
Yeah, what's interesting about people like OP is that they don't realize how much knowledge they put into their own system to make it that easy.
I have a project I've been maintaining for the last three months that just more or less built itself at this point, and yet when I start a new project, I feel like I'm starting from square one.