"Most published research findings are false."
Say that out loud in a hospital and you'd get laughed out of the room. That's the actual title of a paper by John Ioannidis at Stanford, whom Dr. Aseem Malhotra calls the most cited medical researcher alive.
The greater the financial interest in a field, the less likely its research is to be true.
Doctors treat the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and The Lancet like biblical truth. They don't realize how much of it is corrupted by vested interests.
Dr. Malhotra spent years treating those journals as gospel. Then he realized what he was actually reading: studies bought and shaped by the people who profit from them.
He isn't saying doctors are bad. He's saying they're being manipulated and don't know it.
White people are terrified of being seen as racist.
If white guilt permeates the online world and our schools, then our adults will feel guilty too.
This helps neither whites nor ethnics.
My ARC speech:
Watch closely new video showing the U.N. reaction: as courageous former hostage Ilana Gritzewsky confronts October 7th denier Reem al-Salemâby recounting the horrific abuse she suffered from Hamasâthe U.N. rapporteur on violence against women sits there stone-faced. No empathy.
For many parents in China this week, the biggest news has been the discovery of formamide in diapers produced by several well-known domestic brands. According to reports, after a journalist used a baby diaper overnight, the concentration of formamide detected in his blood nearly doubled.
Formamide is a colourless organic compound commonly used as an industrial solvent. In 2012, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) listed formamide as a Category 1B reproductive toxic substance, meaning that animal testing data indicates it poses potential risks to the human reproductive system.
This is yet another example of how China, despite being home to some of the worldâs tallest skyscrapers and cutting-edge technologies ranging from robots to AI, remains fundamentally a failed state.
1. First, this reflects the failure of Chinaâs growth model.
As I have argued repeatedly, after nearly fifty years of development, China still fundamentally relies on a low-cost growth model. Why would diaper manufacturers use formamide in products meant for babies? The answer is simple: in industries operating on razor-thin profit margins, competition is so brutal that every possible cost must be cut. Formamide often enters the production process through the use of cheap industrial adhesives, low-quality plastics, and other hazardous chemical materials used to reduce manufacturing costs.
In many ways, it is difficult to blame factory owners alone. Between tax burdens that in many cases exceed what companies pay their workers, along with growing external pressures such as tariffs imposed on Chinese exports, many manufacturers simply cannot survive unless they save every penny on materials and production costs.
2. More broadly, this exposes the failure of Chinaâs governance model.
Over the years, China has experienced countless scandals involving workplace safety, product safety, and food safety. Unlike many developing countries where such problems stem primarily from weak enforcement capacity, Chinaâs problem is different.
The Chinese state possesses enormous enforcement capacity. The issue is that the government deliberately chooses to deploy that capacity selectively â overwhelmingly in areas that threaten the regime itself.
This is why someone criticizing the government anonymously online can often be identified within minutes and imprisoned, while those producing unsafe food, toxic consumer products, or dangerous industrial goods frequently face little real consequence.
The reason is simple: the officials making these decisions do not consume these products themselves.
Ultimately, the only way for Chinese citizens to live a genuinely decent and secure life is political change. Otherwise, these scandals will continue to repeat themselves again and again, just as they have for decades â from the melamine-tainted milk powder scandal to toxic diapers today.
The pattern is clear: under the current system, economic growth may produce skyscrapers and advanced technology, but it cannot guarantee something as basic as safe food, safe products, or basic human dignity.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Congress that Wi-Fi radiation changes DNA and causes cancer.
When asked this in court a year ago: "Do you still stand by your claim?"
He replied: "Yes."
Kennedy took this case to the court of appeals against the FCC. The court ruled in his favor.
He says many scientific studies have linked electromagnetic radiation to cancer. But cancer isn't even the frontline concern, neurological injury is.
When asked if 5G and RF carry the same risks, he didn't hesitate:
"Any electromagnetic radiation, inculding 5G, RF and Wi-Fi do"
That hearing happened a year ago.
Since then:
âą Most people still sleep next to their phone
âą Most people still hold it against their head daily
âą Most people still carry it in a front pocket for 1 hour on the way to work
A federal court sided with Kennedy over the FCC on the safety of wireless radiation.
That ruling exists. The studies exist. The testimony is public record.
And almost nobody is talking about it.
â Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (@RobertKennedyJr)
PS. This account exists to share useful health insights every human needs to hear.
If this post interests you, follow me for moreâyou won't want to miss what's scheduled next.
CANCER HAS BEEN CURED
Ivermectin & Fenbendazole cure cancer.
Pass it on.
BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024!
The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW.
My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCCâs Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life.
I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment.
Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole
Stephen Ireland, who targeted me with endless abuse on here because I oppose the chemical castration of children and the removal of protected spaces for women and girls, has just been sentenced to 30 years in jail for child rape.
@forallcurious Nobel Prize winner Yoshinori Ohsumi revealed autophagy, your bodyâs hidden repair mode where cells clean out damage and recycle it into fresh energy đŹâš
Fasting, movement, and small stress triggers can switch it on, helping you stay stronger, sharper, and age healthier.
Scientists have identified a reversal of the long-standing Flynn effectâthe roughly 200-year trend of rising average intelligence (measured via IQ and cognitive tests) across generations.
For the first time in modern recorded history, Generation Z (born roughly 1997â2012) shows lower performance than previous generations in key cognitive domains, including attention, memory, literacy, numeracy, executive function, problem-solving, and general IQâdespite spending more years in formal education than ever before.
Neuroscientist and educator Dr. Jared Cooney Horvath, PhD, MEd, testified before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation on January 15, 2026, highlighting this shift. In his written testimony, he stated that cognitive development in children across much of the developed world has stalled or reversed over the past two decades, with declines evident in international assessments (e.g., PISA, TIMSS) and other large-scale data starting around the mid-2000s and accelerating post-2010.
Horvath attributes the primary driver not to reduced schooling, but to the widespread integration of digital screens and educational technology (EdTech) in classrooms. He argues that human brains evolved for deep, focused learning through face-to-face interaction and sustained attention, not fragmented skimming or constant task-switching encouraged by devices.
Key points from his testimony include:
- Teens now spend over half their waking hours on screens, with significant portions in school involving computers or tabletsâoften leading to off-task behavior and shallower processing.
- Evidence from meta-analyses and national/international studies shows a consistent pattern: higher classroom screen exposure correlates with weaker outcomes in reading, math, science, and higher-order reasoning.
- Digital tools may aid narrow, repetitive skill practice in controlled settings, but in core academic contexts, they tend to reduce depth of understanding, retention, and critical thinking.
Horvath describes this as a "structural mismatch" between human cognition and how digital platforms are designed (to capture and fragment attention), warning that unchecked EdTech adoption risks long-term harm to workforce skills, innovation, and societal reasoning.
[Horvath, J. C. (2026). Written testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. U.S. Senate]
New research reveals that constant complaining does more than annoy those around youâit can actually weaken your brain.
Every time you focus on whatâs wrong, your body releases stress hormones like cortisol, which interfere with neural function and reduce the brainâs ability to adapt and learn.
The impact is not just mental. Elevated cortisol levels can impair memory, decision-making, and problem-solving skills.
Over time, a habit of negativity can make your brain less resilient, affecting emotional regulation and overall cognitive performance. Essentially, the more you complain, the harder it becomes for your brain to handle challenges effectively.
Shifting your focus from problems to solutions isnât just good adviceâitâs backed by science.
Practising gratitude, positive thinking, and constructive problem-solving can lower stress hormones, strengthen neural pathways, and help your brain remain agile and adaptable throughout life.
#TheSciencePulse
#BrainHealth #PositiveMindset
Dr. Erica Komisar just said what many parents whisper but few say out loud: Modern schools are built for girls, not boysâand weâre paying a steep price.
Little boys (ages 3â6) surge with testosterone. They need to run, jump, play, burn energy.
Instead, we sit them in circle time, demand emotional regulation, and label normal boy behavior as ADHD or âbehavioral problems.â
Result? Marginalized, stressed, diagnosed early, and tracked that way through school.
Her fix if she ran the world:
Separate boys and girls in the early years.
Boys get multiple recess periods, short focused bursts, and space to move.
Girls get a calmer environment where they feel safe taking STEM/math risks.
Both thrive when not forced into the opposite genderâs learning style.
Single-gender early education: Boys try art/music without teasing. Girls try science without self-consciousness.
Evidence already shows it works.
Parents/teachers: Do you see boys struggling more in todayâs classroomsâor is this overblown?
Whatâs one change youâd make to education for boys right now?
This elderly chimpanzee, too weak to eat or drink, was nearing the end of her life. Caretakers called her former caregiver of 40 years for a final visit, and she immediately recognized him.
In the early 1990s, a pharma campaign dramatically rewired how the public understood depression. Hereâs how it happenedâand why it worked.
Before they launched the campaign, pharma did market research on what people believed caused depression, says psychiatrist Dr. @joannamoncrieff, author of âChemically Imbalanced.â
âThey asked people: âWhat do you think depression is caused by?â And one of the options they gave to people is: It's caused by a chemical imbalance or some sort of biological abnormality in the brain,â she told me.
They found that the vast majority of people didn't think that depression was caused by an underlying medical condition:
âThey thought depression was caused by unemployment, divorce, having been abused as a child, adverse life events⊠and they also thought that treating depression with a drug would just numb someone's emotions, and wasn't a sensible idea, and might lead to people becoming dependent on the drug,â she says.
They thus concluded that an elaborate marketing effort was needed. Antidepressant manufacturers funded a âDefeat Depressionâ campaign that sought to convince people that depression is a medical condition caused by a âchemical imbalance in the brainâ and a lack of serotonin that must be treated with anti-depressants.
The pharmaceutical industry âvery deliberately set out to change people's minds and to persuade people instead that depression is a biological condition and needs a biological remedy, i.e., the drugs that they were promoting,â she says.
BREAKING: A detransitioned woman who received a "gender affirming" double mastectomy at the age of 16 just received a $2 million medical malpractice judgment from a jury in New York state.
The dam just broke.