Olivia
Online
The Puppeteer
@_ThePuppeteer
The Canada Health system is not what it seems. The secrets it beholds and the protection it possesses. What else may be lingering within?
Canada
Joined July 2022
0 Following
115 Followers
190 Posts
Pinned Tweet
Season 1 : Episode 4 ~ Missing - Part 1
What does it mean to be missing?
This may take the form of materialistic item or a metaphorical meaning.
Regardless of the form.
One may not retain knowledge - that they indeed are missing something.
Thus - would imply one is not missing something if they have no knowledge of it.
We digress.
————————————
God bless America - and God bless the people around the world - who do not have the power or guarantees of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Listen on Apple Podcasts
https://t.co/kDxq7mju26
@cdnfordemocracy Why support a nation - that does not support its people? After all - a nation is nothing without its people. - Canada does not have freedom of speech nor guarantee any rights or freedoms - under Section 1.
@ABDanielleSmith https://t.co/ftVtiEylSj
Season 1 : Episode 4 - MISSING - Part 1 ~ Trailer
See you in 24 Hours - Tick - Tock - Tock - Canada.
@RepJayapal The Healthcare System in Canada - is so broken and corrupt.
Private Healthcare is superior in every way.
However, to have a two Tier system - Public and Private Healthcare - would be a win - win for all sides.
@IvankaNews_ https://t.co/7ZwPx2u6Jy
Season 1 : Episode 4 - MISSING - Part 1 ~ Trailer
See you in 24 Hours - Tick - Tock - Tock - Canada.
@SusanBruiser Could we not what?
Season 1 : Episode 4 ~ Missing - Part 1
What does it mean to be missing?
This may take the form of materialistic item or a metaphorical meaning.
Regardless of the form.
One may not retain knowledge - that they indeed are missing something.
Thus - would imply one is not missing something if they have no knowledge of it.
We digress.
————————————
God bless America - and God bless the people around the world - who do not have the power or guarantees of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Listen on Apple Podcasts
https://t.co/kDxq7mju26
@albertaseparate https://t.co/7ZwPx2tyU0
Season 1 : Episode 4 - MISSING - Part 1 ~ Trailer
See you in 24 Hours - Tick - Tock - Tock - Canada.
Season 1 : Episode 4 - MISSING - Part 1 ~ Trailer
See you in 24 Hours - Tick - Tock - Tock - Canada.
@CBCNews First in British Columbia, Ontario now Nova Scotia - we tried to warn you.
@MJTruthUltra https://t.co/cuPiEtUSt5
You may wish to watch our episode discussing Lyme Disease in Canada.
Mass corruption within the Health Industry in Canada where we address how and why the government of Canada does not acknowledge Lyme Disease as a chronic illness.
Whereas if infected within 30 days, you must undergo 3 months of oral antibiotics under the name ‘doxycycline’.
However, if infected past 30 days, you do not need to undergo any treatment as “your body kills off the infection”.
If true, why must patients undergo 3 months of oral antibiotics that is detrimental to your digestive system including your ‘gut health’.
This, is due to, money.
Chronic Lyme Disease is a tricky disease. Lyme is great at hiding itself from being identified from within. Whereas chronic Lyme Disease must be treated with IV antibiotics, such as, ‘ceftriaxone’.
However, upon the first 3 weeks of treatment (IV treatment 5 - 7 days a week). Lyme Disease tends to form into cysts and the patient goes into remission.
The patient unknowingly to be assumed as cured, is not.
Yet, within days of our episode being released. The government of Canada released funding for research of ‘rare diseases’ such as chronic Lyme Disease.
A way to address Lyme Disease without addressing Lyme Disease. Lyme disease is becoming an epidemic within North America. Patients experiencing chronic inflammation, palpitations, pericardial effusion and brain damage.
However, conflicting medical studies that uphold this statement but also contradict statement.
Whereas money and accountability is the why. Who is responsible for Lyme Disease?
If you may question the validity of chronic Lyme Disease. Just ask yourself this one question.
When a Canadian applies for United States healthcare, the appropriate questions like every application are asked. However, there is one particular question that is asked. This one question is not asked once, not twice, rather this one question is asked three times in different ways:
“Have you ever been bitten by a tick that was suspected of carrying Lyme Disease?”
“Have you underwent Lyme Disease treatment?”
“Have you ever contracted Lyme disease?”
Ask yourself, why?
You may wish to watch our episode discussing Lyme Disease in Canada.
Mass corruption within the Health Industry in Canada where we address how and why the government of Canada does not acknowledge Lyme Disease as a chronic illness.
Whereas if infected within 30 days, you must undergo 3 months of oral antibiotics under the name ‘doxycycline’.
However, if infected past 30 days, you do not need to undergo any treatment as “your body kills off the infection”.
If true, why must patients undergo 3 months of oral antibiotics that is detrimental to your digestive system including your ‘gut health’.
This, is due to, money.
Chronic Lyme Disease is a tricky disease. Lyme is great at hiding itself from being identified from within. Whereas chronic Lyme Disease must be treated with IV antibiotics, such as, ‘ceftriaxone’.
However, upon the first 3 weeks of treatment (IV treatment 5 - 7 days a week). Lyme Disease tends to form into cysts and the patient goes into remission.
The patient unknowingly to be assumed as cured, is not.
Yet, within days of our episode being released. The government of Canada released funding for research of ‘rare diseases’ such as chronic Lyme Disease.
A way to address Lyme Disease without addressing Lyme Disease. Lyme disease is becoming an epidemic within North America. Patients experiencing chronic inflammation, palpitations, pericardial effusion and brain damage.
However, conflicting medical studies that uphold this statement but also contradict statement.
Whereas money and accountability is the why. Who is responsible for Lyme Disease?
If you may question the validity of chronic Lyme Disease. Just ask yourself this one question.
When a Canadian applies for United States healthcare, the appropriate questions like every application are asked. However, there is one particular question that is asked. This one question is not asked once, not twice, rather this one question is asked three times in different ways:
“Have you ever been bitten by a tick that was suspected of carrying Lyme Disease?”
“Have you underwent Lyme Disease treatment?”
“Have you ever contracted Lyme disease?”
Ask yourself, why?
@elonmusk A right is a right.
To impose limits on a right.
Is not a right.
Merely a temporary grant.
How many more years until Canada fails to stand united? After all, such a treaty is null and void without freedom, peace and democracy.
Just because something or ‘someone’ saids they are that something. Does not mean they are that something.
As politicians tend to distort the reality:
“We created 1 million jobs.”
Whilst failing to disclose they lost 2 million jobs.
Tick-Tock-Tock
We’ve noticed, regardless of one’ view or opinion on a subject. Their opinion is usually biased on the basis of one or two factors.
In this case, a group of individuals are being discriminated on their political views (Pierre Poilievre) believers.
Whereas @merry123459 is assuming and sharing, the individuals who’s political view is that of conservative, are intellectually inapt.
Not only is this wrong. Thus, is illegal. Not only illegal, rather concerning behavior. Those who share a different belief or opinion that are demonized.
This is ironic, as your beloved Hon. Justin Trudeau (Liberals) are advocating for further speech infringements.
If Bill C-63 ~ Online Harms Act is passed; such as statements @merry123459 just shared. Will be considered a hate crime, thus, resulting in a sentence for life in prison.
Perhaps, those who oppose your political views see the whole picture and understand the value of freedom.
Nonetheless, Bill C-63; C-367; are a threat to religious freedoms and freedom as a whole.
@Dustin88Stone
Again, as it may be true the province or territory is responsible for addiction/mental health care. Yes, the responsibility does not solely belong to the Prime Minister. However, a true leader will take responsibility for government to ensure the safety and success of his/her people.
In the case a province or territory is endangering the citizens. Yes, the Prime Minister can intervene to ensure the safety of his/her people. However, this would have to occur on a civil society aspect in the courts or new statues instilled.
You @ben__dowler mention the Prime Minister to “defy the constitution”.
The Hon. Justin Trudeau (Liberal Party of Canada) in collaboration with the federal New Democratic Party of Canada, have defied the constitution through censorship bills (C-11 & C18), religious persecution (C-4, C-367 & C-63) and other enactments that are morally wrong and in contravention of the Charter.
As a society, we must look past our differences and recognize there is a problem. Healthcare in Canada is a problem, whereas doctors are not paid enough, citizens must wait years to obtain a general physician. Most importantly, the corruption within the health industry is of concern.
Whereas men, woman and children are met with abuse, rape, invalidated and sometimes demise.
Whereas those responsible are persons of authority and public bodies.
Whereas the responsibility lies with government policies and statues, that allow such transgressions to continue with no recourse.
However, this is not the blame game. All sides, left or right, have good qualities and bad qualities. Pointing fingers will merely ‘fuel the fire’, causing conflict and delays.
Regardless of who is responsible, how do we find common ground? How do we improve? First and foremost, we must begin with transparency and accountability, followed by progressive changes.
This is an argument that may be considered arrogant. Although arrogant, shows one’ true stance on such matters. Simply, denial.
As it may true, legislation allows provinces/territories to address addiction/mental health matters.
A true leader shall and will, intervene.
Whereas, in British Columbia, the opioid deaths have surpassed the COVID-19 deaths in the province, due to, the legalization of all drugs.
You do share, interesting words “take responsibility”.
It is not only the Hon. Justin Trudeau who must take responsibility for his actions and/or lack of actions, rather many others who have used and abused the system for far too long.
RESPONSIBILITY
~ noun ~
the state or fact of having a duty to deal with something or of having control over someone.
“a true leader takes responsibility for their government and their people to ensure success and safety.”
Perhaps the Hon. Justin Trudeau is not the true leader Canada needs.
@JustinTrudeau @markhollandlib @TurnbullWhitby @JenOConnell_ Watch Full Season 1 : Episode 3 ~ Broken - Part 2 - 2 Trailer here:
https://t.co/w0sii0siAk
Canada is in trouble, the people are being exposed to censorship, authoritarianism, political persecution, infringements of the Charter and religious persecution.
People claim the Hon. Justin Trudeau (Liberal Party of Canada), is nothing but smoke and mirrors.
The Federal Liberal Party of Canada use their bills, like “CDCP” to propagate their ‘need’ and ‘desire’ to help Canadians, whilst speaking down upon their rival, the Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative Party of Canada).
However, many Canadians have been questioning, is the CDCP worth the cost?
We shall be publishing a full report regarding Bill C-31 soon, as to why this bill is nothing but smoke and mirrors. In the meantime, please review the religious persecution that is coming from Canada’ leader and his associates.
Socialist states always have three (3) characteristics in common. Censorship, lack of speech rights and authoritarianism. Whereas socialism always evolves to communism. Canada possesses all three (3) characteristics. Whereas as stated by the Prime Minister of Canada:
“The small fringe minority . . . Holding unacceptable views that they are expressing. Do not represent the views of Canadians . . . ‘
I do not care what the unvaxed think . . . but there are people who are fiercely against vaccination. They are extremists, who don’t believe in science, they’re often misogynists, also often racists. It’s a small group that muscles in and we have to make a choice, in terms of leaders, in terms of this country. Do we tolerate these people?”
For a leader to say something so spurious, is for one to say they do not care for the freedoms and rights of Canadians or respect the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Some may hold the view, that people not getting vaccinated is reckless. Whilst others may hold the view, that people getting vaccinated is reckless. This is because everyone has the right to their own opinion. However, for a leader to state the unvaccinated people are risking the freedoms and rights of Canadians, is alienation. That being said, as a leader, one does not have the right to punish and disgrace their people, simply because their opinion, expression, belief or thought is different. That right there is called a dictatorship.
The two (2) oldest and active political parties, are the federal Communist Party of Canada and Liberal Party of Canada. Have been deemed a great threat to democracy based on the totality of circumstances and attacks on rights and freedoms.
From the 1880’s to the 1980’s, Canada committed genocide against Canadian children. Hundreds-of-thousands of children exposed to assault, torture, rape, medical experimentation and murder.
Canada has evolved from genocide to communism.
— Bill C-63 ~ Online Harms Act — (cited in post)
Freedom of religion is no longer in Canada, where statues have been instilled or in the process. Bill C-4 is quite scary, imprisoning pastors, however, the persecution that is to come from new laws. Will cause profound anguish for Canadians of belief.
Bill C-367 ~ An Act to amend the Criminal Code
with the sole purpose to:
“This enactment amends the Criminal Code to eliminate as a defence against wilful promotion of hatred or antisemitism the fact that a person, in good faith, expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text.”
Thus, will repeal the right to defence of one who may read certain scriptures or share their opinion based on a belief in a religious text that may be perceived as ‘hateful’.
Whereas bill C-63 ~Online Harms Act, a bill disguised to propagate the protection of children to covertly change the Criminal Code of Canada. However, the devil is within the details.
Section 320.1001(1), states whomever commits an offence motivated by hatred, even if that is reading from the Bible or merely reading from a fictitious book out loud in public, that may be considered hate speech, is liable to imprisonment for life. Even if one, may preach the word of God online, if you do that in Canada, if it may be considered ‘hate opinion’ (propaganda), you are liable to imprisonment for life.
Bill C-63 does not stop there, section 810.012(1), named “Fear of hate propaganda offence or hate crime”, states whomever may fear someone may commit an offence, the AG may lay an information before a judge to have a warrant issued. If the accused of not committing any offence, refuses to wear an electronic monitoring device and/or judges conditions. Will be imprisoned for up to 12 months. A jail sentence for a “pre-crime” that someone merely fears you may commit and with your pre-crime sentence, you do not have the right to know who fears you may commit an offence.
The federal Communist Party of Canada and Liberal Party of Canada, the two (2) oldest and active political parties. Have been deemed a great threat to democracy based on the totality of circumstances and attacks on rights and freedoms.
Such attacks from the 1880’s to 2024, that have evolved from genocide to communism, such as, but limited to, censorship, political persecution, wrongful imprisonment, human rights violations, infringements of the Charter or religious persecution.
Trudeau is not capable of taking Canada’ ‘Freedom of Speech’, because it is not existent, to be taken.
Freedom of speech in Canada was repealed and the Bill of Rights was replaced by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982.
Effectively eliminating freedom of speech and granting merely freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. Whereas the government may impose reasonable limits to such ‘rights and freedoms’ under Section 1 of the Charter.
Any limits imposed on a right or freedom, is unreasonable. Period. A right is a right. To impose limits on a right, is not a right. Merely a temporary grant.
As per @elonmusk remark:
“There is no constitutional right to freedom of speech in Canada, and there is no Miranda rights in Canada, people like think like, you know, you have the right to remain silent. You don't actually in Canada.”
Mr. Elon Musk is correct.
Whereas in Canada, you do NOT have the right to freedom of speech.
In Canada you have the freedom of expression.
Whereas such expression is further limited through Section 1 of the charter.
Whereas the government of Canada can impose reasonable limits to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
This being said, Bill C-11 and Bill C-18 are nicely dressed censorship bills.
Whereas the government slowly takes more and more. Such as, going after podcasts. Until freedom of expression is nothing but an idea.
However, the Canada Bill of Rights paints a different picture.
Whereas the Bill of Rights guarantees “freedom of speech”.
As such, censorship laws as described herein, are in contravention of the Canadian Bill of Rights.
However, as stated by the Supreme Court of Canada.
Whereas the Supreme Court of Canada has maintained that the connection between the freedom of expression and the political process is perhaps the linchpin of section 2. b. protection. Free expression is valued above all as being instrumental to democratic governance. Other rationals for protecting freedom of expression is to encourage the search for truth.
Whereas if the purpose of the government action or legislation is to limit expression, it will violate s. 2(b).
As such, censorship laws as described herein, are in contravention of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
@Canada @SupremeCourtCan
These actions and lack of actions are shameful by those responsible @JustinTrudeau @liberal_party @NDP.
This shall not stand in the name of democracy and the courts shall have the last say.
Law challenges coming soon.
Tick-Tock-Tock.
@PierrePoilievre @CPC_HQ
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
FAMILY STORY 🧔🏻♂️
Seen from Thailand
Jackthread101
Seen from United Kingdom
3d NSFW 🔞
Seen from Turkey
Your Favourite Trans Lady
Seen from Indonesia
زوجين متحررين بلا حدود
Seen from Saudi Arabia
ATEŞLİ GECELER
Seen from Turkey
Fetish melayu uniform
Seen from Malaysia
Sk4d00.sh
Seen from United States
ยัยฟ้า
Seen from Thailand
🐽PAYPIG🐷
Seen from Netherlands
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.8M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers
✨
⭐
💫