Videos exclusively posted so that politicians like @RahulGandhi@ArvindKejriwal don’t come on filthy sold out media houses & seek visual proofs. Good going @adgpi#JaiHind
#WATCH Indian Army Sources: Army troops recently used anti-tank guided missiles & artillery shells to target Pakistan Army positions opposite the Kupwara sector. This was in response to frequent ceasefire violations by Pakistan to push infiltrators into Indian territory in J&K.
Dear @vdsatheesan
I understand your compulsions of hvng to worship at the altar of current dynasty god of the Cong. That is your faith. You hv a right to practise it.
I nor most Indians hv no such compulsions.
We can speak the truth about fraud politics when we see it exposed.
Theres no sane person on this planet that remotely thinks that Rahul Gandhi is a defender of anything important , leave alone Democracy and Secularism.
Rahul Gandhi is a defender of only one thing - his dynasties / families interest.
I can put my hand on my chest and say this: Rahul Gandhi’s politics and therefore Congress’s politics is built on hypocrisy, lies, fraud and bots!
You mentioned it - So lets talk about the Cong record of secularism and democracy.
A lesson in history is in order. As much tortured twisting you do to escape your history, it simply cant be forgotten.
Under Cong, the communal violence:
❌ 1969 Ahmedabad riots
❌ 1980 Moradabad riots
❌ 1984 anti-Sikh riots in Delhi
❌ 1989 Bhagalpur riots . etc
Sajjan Kumar was not a BJP leader. This convicted Killer was a senior Congress leader and a Lok Sabha MP. Dont forget what Rahuls guru Sam Pitroda said "It happened. So what?" - no remorse. no regret.
Closer home in Keralam, the Congress history of communal violence reads like a horror story.
❌ 2002 Marad communal violence
❌ 2003 Marad massacre
All under Congress CMs.
And more recently Congress alliance with Jamaat Islami - an outfit that a decent Cong CM Oomen Chandy said was opposed to Constitution and Secular values - contradicts ur image building of Rahul.
Not to forget that Rahul gave a secularism certificate to Indian Union Muslim league, who are so emboldened under Congress that they say women should stay at home and those who say "It is Religion, religion, religion" are made ministers.
10 years of Cong led UPA corruption and appeasement politics - trying to blame 26/11 terror attacks on Hindus, not celebrating Kargil Vijay Diwas, Sonia Gandhi crying when Batla house terrorists were killed, Rajender Sachar report saying Muslims have first right to countrys resources etc - Cong was never ever secular. They were only interested in vote bank aka Muslim politics.
Saying Rahul is a defender of Democracy is a bit much even for a Cong devotee. Starting with amendments to Art 19 right to free speech, stuffing vote boxes and winning elections for decades, Suspending constitutional rights of citizens during Emergency, enacting sec 66A to police online speech, Use of Agencies to intimidate opponents - Congress record in Democracy is extremely dubious (to put it politely).
I personally was targetted multiple times by then Cong govt. It didnt feel very democratic.
So while I respect your compulsions at hvng to defend the indefensible - positioning Rahul as a defender of Democracy and Secularism is frankly a bad bad terrible joke.
If you want to see real democracy and real secularism in action, look at the last 12 years. Put your hand on your chest. Compare 12 years of PM @NarendraModi ji’s governance with 10 years of Congress’s UPA.
India is home to one of the world's largest Muslim populations and other minorities like Christians, Sikhs, jains, Buddhists.
Every law abiding Indian citizen lives in peace and safety today.
Every Indian regardless of their faith gas access to every scheme of PM @narendramodi govt without any discrimination and enjoys benefits of progress and opportunity.
The only truth is that BJP/NDA protect and strengthen Democracy and secularism, while Congress destroyed it and today continues to try and cause damage by fraud and lies.
Feel free to contradict me. Present facts and substance .
Lies are Lies. Politicians who practise politics of lies are frauds.
I repeat @RahulGandhi is a fraud and that he must apologize first to Election commission for his lies and to PM for calling him a deshdrohi.
#APAKADAMPolitics #RahulGandhiExposed
Dear @Javedakhtarjadu. I'm afraid your response is as boring and overloaded as your similes and metaphors. When countered with facts, you shift the goalpost, bring in the RSS, berate the right wing, take refuge in context, cushion the bigotry, and claim Kafirs were Colonialists not Hindus.
I know countering you again is like watering a cactus and praying for leechis, but in the hope that all that knee massaging with Doctor Ortho would have sprouted some neurons, here goes:
You asked for a source because you said the quote was “quite unlike” Azad’s “lifelong sociopolitical stances.” I gave you the source: Calcutta, 27 October 1914, published in Khutbat-e-Azad. The words are his. That should have ended the enquiry. It did not. So let us walk through your new script, line by line.
1. “The khutbats were about Khilafat and British colonialism.”
Yes. That is what I wrote. Maulana Azad was telling Indian Muslims that a Turk’s battlefield thorn must be felt in a Hindustani Muslim’s heart; that Millat-e-Islam is one body; that friendship and enmity are for the religion of Allah. Then he quoted Quran 48:29 and added his own gloss: be extremely hard against disbelievers, extremely kind among yourselves, and do not pass over this as if you had not heard it. You asked for the when and where. You received both. “It was about Khilafat” is not a rebuttal. It is the context in which he said it.
2. “To claim he was quoting this about the Hindus of India will not be true. The Kafir here was the colonialist.”
I did not say the 1914 speech was a municipal circular against the Hindus of Howrah. I quoted what Azad quoted: a Quranic verse about kuffar, and his commentary on unbelief, Tawhid, and hardness toward disbelievers. If Azad had meant “kafir = only the British officer,” he knew Urdu enough to say Angrez. He did not. He used the Book’s word, then told his flock not to skip it.
And if “kafir” in Azad’s mouth was a temporary colonial nickname, kindly explain the 1920 Hijrat fatwa, published in Ahl-e-Hadith of Amritsar, in which he said Indian Muslims had no choice but to migrate, and that those who stayed and kept connection with “the enemy of Islam” would themselves be counted as the enemy of Islam. That is not a lecture on income-tax collectors. That is a theology of the land.
3. “When Ataturk took over, Azad called it a closed chapter and condoned the secular government.”
Men change. Texts do not. If later Azad made peace with the death of the Caliphate, good for the later Azad. It does not unsay 1914, nor the Khilafat years, nor Masala-e-Khilafat, nor the call that any government hostile to Turkey was hostile to Islam, not the belief in the Quranic verse damning the Kafirs. You began by saying the paragraph was unlike his lifelong stances. Lifelong includes the years he spent as a pan-Islamist firebrand. Evolution is not an eraser. It is a timeline.
4. “Read his Calcutta High Court statement. An honour no member of the Mahasabha or RSS was ever given.”
Sedition charges from the Raj are not a unique family heirloom. Tilak got them. Aurobindo got them. Savarkar was given two life terms and sent to Cellular Jail, where the honour included the oil mill, the lash, and years in a cell the size of a cupboard.
And of course, knowing your pitiful knowledge of Indian History, I guess you would not know legendary RSS names like Devipad Chaudhary, Jagatpati Kumar, Anna Saheb Deshpande, Ramakant Keshav, Vasantrao Oak, Narayan Singh, Chandrakant Bhardwaj, Dada Naik Chimur, Baburao Begade, Lala Hansraj, Balaji Raipurkar who participated in our freedom struggle and were jailed or shot.
5. “Azad was in British jails for nine years. Name one from your right wing who can match that.”
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: roughly a decade in Kala Pani, further years in mainland jails, then thirteen years of internment in Ratnagiri. Sentence on paper: fifty years. Conditions: not Ahmednagar Fort with time to write Ghubar-e-Khatir.
By the way, you might know that your great-great-grandfather Fazl-e-Haq Khairabadi was also incarcerated at Kala Pani. What you might not know, or would want to hide, is that he wrote a grovelling mercy petition to the British, pleading to be released.
6. “In 1946 Jinnah refused to shake Azad’s hand. He hated Azad for his patriotism.”
How does this turn “be severe against the kafirs, merciful among themselves” into a sonnet about communal harmony? A man can spend 1946 refusing Partition and still have spent 1914 telling Indian Muslims that their first body is the ummah. Fairness is holding both pages open. What you are doing is hiding the 1914 page and waving the 1946 one like a flag.
7. “Your reference to Rahul Gandhi was unnecessary, I expect decency and class.”
And I expected you to have some sense of humour. The PS was a reminder that this is the second time I have had to fetch your hero’s paperwork. Last time it was Nehru’s India: books banned, editors sacked, films blocked, Majrooh jailed for a couplet.
You lecture me on class after moving from “this cannot be Azad” to “it is Azad but you must read kafir as colonialist” to “anyway he went to jail” to “Jinnah was rude to him” to “please don’t mention Rahul.” That is not class. That is a guided tour of every exit except the text.
Look, Javed sahab, let us end this here. I like you. Doubtless a lot of your work is incredible, truly it is. So in that spirit, permit me to pen an ode to you:
Javed Akhtar ko dekha toh aisa laga, jaise chhal ka nawab, jaise jhoot ki kitaab, jaise dhong ki kiran, jaise adambar ka van, jaise kapton ki baat, jaise pakhand ki raat, jaise janpath mein ho ek jalta diya.
Alvida, Shabba khair. WDTP
A proud moment for Indian cricket!
Congratulations to the Women’s team on winning the Asia Cup. Their confidence, consistency and remarkable spirit were on full display throughout the tournament.
May this triumph inspire millions of youngsters across the country to play more and shine.
Chef Sanjeev Kapoor shuts down the debate on Veg vs Non Veg Food!
Chef Sanjeev Kapoor went on a debate over vegetarian menu served at the BRICS Summit.
News Anchor: The menu at the BRICS summit has triggered many people. Is this a vegetarian imposition through a vegetarian menu?
Sanjeev Kapoor: Veg or non-veg food depends on whose home you are visiting. If you go to someone’s house, you will eat their food. If you visit France, you will expect what France has to offer. You represent your culture to the guests. The world is now promoting vegan food. We should be happy that India is at the forefront. Why the outrage?
Sanjeev Kapoor single-handedly tore apart those mocking the menu.
Imagine how much effort Foreign Media does to show India in Bad Light.
So many photographers must have set camera and waited for hours for a cycle to pass in front of poster.
Hundreds of Audi, Merc, Defender would've crossed. But one cycle is what Media shows.
Hitler was Vegetarian
Gandhiji was Vegetarian
Hitler stopped smoking
Gandhiji stopped smoking
Hitler stopped alchohol
Gandhiji didn't drink alcohol
Hitler used to take long walk
Gandhiji used to take long walk
Also,
Sanjay Jha is non-vegetarian
Osama was non-veg
Sanjay Jha keeps beard
Osama keeps beard
Sanjay Jha appears on TV sometimes
Osama appeared on TV sometimes
Sanjay Jha gets abused and mocked
Osama is abused and mocked
Both worships their leader blindly
According to the FIR, Aparna Kurup faces charges including provocation to cause riots, outraging religious feelings, hurting religious sentiments, and promoting enmity between groups.
All this for questioning and criticizing Islamic scholar Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliar, who said that women should remain confined to their homes and that public appearances by women lead to great destruction.
From facing death threats to facing an FIR, the so-called feminists and "Smash the Patriarchy" brigade have gone completely silent.
It seems her leftist friends and ecosystem have also left her.
The loudest champions of free speech suddenly discovered the value of silence.
When the MCD under the BJP was trying to demolish illegal and dangerous buildings in Delhi, Kejriwal stood against it.
He ordered his MLAs to protest and even go to jail if they had to, but not let a single building be demolished.
And now AAPiyas have the audacity to ask why illegal structures are still standing.
Granted that you were not Home Minister on the exact day or the hour of the Naxal attack that brutally killed your partys state leadership.
For almost 4 years you were Home Minister.
The Naxal terrorists who slaughtered your Congress colleagues in May 2013 did not magically appear the day you moved to the Finance Ministry, @PChidambaram_IN.
They grew, armed themselves, and gained strength under your watch - an admitted #DimaghiNaxal - thriving in a security "doctrine" of inaction, created by your elitist political idealogy and the UPA's #DimaghiNaxals.
Saying “I changed cabins by then,” when you were the architect of the DimaghiNaxal idealogy and doctrine that cost the lives of your own colleagues, is an insult to their memory.
As Home Minister you celebrated Naxals, as Finance Minister encouraged Cronies -
is it any wonder the Cong decade was a disaster for India’s security and economy?
#CongressLostDecade
Pak had full access to Chinese satellite imagery, targeting data and battle damage photos.
And yet Op Chaddi Banyan Marsoos video had to be made entirely with AI 😂🤦🏽♂️.
Is the Pak public really this stupid? Or is the PAF really this disconnected?
Another lie peddled to us was that Sonia Gandhi sacrificed power in 2004.
She became Super PM without accountability, with PMO files routed through her and the actual PM reduced to a rubber stamp.
That is what actual subversion of the Constitution looks like.
Number of times the PM visited the North-East :
Manmohan Singh
8 visits in 10 years
Narendra Modi
78 visits in 12 years
Interestingly, Manmohan Singh was also a Rajya Sabha Member from Assam.