@_brainzilla_ If you believed we were as bad as slavers or nazis you would use violence against us like we did against slavers and nazis.
You dont act like you believe the shit you say.
Its laughable
@loserfag111443 "If we are worse then nazis like your side claims"
Nope. Just similar in dehumanization methods. You can't argue in good faith, can you?
It's an interesting tangent, but until you start arguing perceptively we can't explore it.
This account just repeats the same argument: "you don't care enough about a genocide happening because you aren't committing a genocide to stop it"
"You aren't hypocritically murderous like I am so that's proof you don't care"
Consider yourself incredibly fortunate.
@_brainzilla_ If you believed this was genocide you would try to stop us like we have stopped genocides in the past.
By violently stopping those that commit the genocide.
You dont try that cause you dont actually think of fetuses as human.
Its pretty obvious
@loserfag111443 No and no. You're have all kinds of comprehension problems.
It is a fact that you dehumanize living human beings exactly like the Nazis did.
Now start over. It's an analogy. Analogies are harder than they appear. They stopped teaching them in schools 20 years ago and it shows
@loserfag111443@Vojti_hello@peggyeshipman Nope, never did. My argument is an equivalence that you can't comprehend.
"You don't truly believe in protecting human rights because you won't violate them to protect them."
You've said it so many times. It doesn't stop being completely wrong and stupid.
@loserfag111443 This isn't even what happened. The Nazis fought a war of conquest. It was fine to resist, using violence.
Your argument remains invalid and you are not accurately identifying what I am suggesting.
@loserfag111443 No, my argument is that protectors of life aren't going to commit the same human rights violations to stop human rights violations.
My argument is further that you are no different than Nazis or slavers. You're walking right into it.
@loserfag111443 "if you believed we were committing genocide you'd commit human rights violations to stop us"
Are you a bot? My entire point is we value human life and protect it.
The analogy of slavers and nazis is to show you are no different than them, and you are happily proving it. Thanks
@loserfag111443 It's the same thing. You still don't get it.
"If you really wanted to stop murder you'd commit murder"
I know what you think. You can't evolve your argument at all.
Keep trying?
@loserfag111443@Vojti_hello@peggyeshipman You're not making an argument. You are repeating something that proves you can't comprehend your own hypocrisy.
You're wrong each time you say it, sorry kiddo.
@loserfag111443 Nope. "You should be committing genocide to stop genocide"
You're not intelligent enough to understand how fundamentally self-defeating your argument is.
Also telling people what they believe and getting it wrong is another layer of dumb.
@loserfag111443@Vojti_hello@peggyeshipman Nope. You're just repeating the same invalid argument.
You see violenve snd human rights violations are solutions. We don't, and it's quite revealing that you simply aren't intelligent enough to get it.
You don't care about bodily autonomy.
Some cool guys walk away from explosions without looking back; I walk away from a truck in parking lots with a very stupid dog screeching at the top of his lungs without looking back.
@loserfag111443 No. Abortionist enthusiasts like yourself solve every problem by trying to violate human rights, usually murder.
See the last word in my bio? "Civilizer."
It is laughable to watch you pretend to care about bodily autonomy. You want to kill people.
@loserfag111443@Vojti_hello@peggyeshipman "you want this thing that shows my poor deductive abilities"
No. You can't comprehend what we want. Has nothing to do with controlling women.
And you already said that thing about not debating. It's simply not true. We aren't the same as you.
You lack comprehension.