@OJEN_ROEJ The more people there are the more the information can be tampered. It’s like a game of telephone (iykyk). After going through 1000000 people that information has most likely been lost in translation effecting the quality of that legal information. Fake news is a great example!
@OJEN_ROEJ@ProvostLaw#OJENROEJFA22
Section 1: Reasonable Limits.
I think protecting innocence is more important than creating an entertaining legal film
@NDHSLawTO@OJEN_ROEJ@NDHSbeach So from what you’re saying is media can be in the courtroom, but the footage should be released at the final verdict to ensure a fair trial?
@Emilyloveslaw@OJEN_ROEJ Court documents are not always public. Justices are allowed to seal these records. The issue with live broadcasting is “innocent until proven guilty” would no longer exists due to mass media companies spinning the information. It now becomes guilty until proven innocent. Unjust!
@sdcilaw@OJEN_ROEJ@ProvostLaw I don’t think you have the right to see victims be tortured when tapes are brought in as eveidence. Your intentions with your rights are slightly questionable
Public opinion is at the forefront of violating s. 11(d), “any person charged with an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty”. By having a live broadcast, public opinion could favour
@OJEN_ROEJ@ProvostLaw#OJENROEJFA22
@OJEN_ROEJ@ProvostLaw#OJENROEJFA22
I have a question for everyone. People are saying we need cameras for transparency to trust the justice system. Is this putting transparency above the protection of innocence? Wouldn’t we be losing trust when they wrongfully convict anyways?
@lawclass328@OJEN_ROEJ The transparency can be seen in other sectors of media. For example case briefs But we need to protect the innocence of people Would you rather someone be wrongfully convicted and lose years of life: David Milgaard or have trust, something that’s broken by wrongful convictions
@STFlawclub@OJEN_ROEJ That’s a fair point but that’s a recording which is again illegal and we are debating a live broadcast. It makes sense to review footage to set future precedents but to use this broadcast as future evidence I. The trial is unfair🥰
@OJEN_ROEJ The only civil matters that concern all of society would be big corporations. But that doesn’t need to be broadcasted because the only piece that matters to the public is the final remedy. Broadcasting civil disputes isn’t as dramatic as society wants it.
@LoyolaLaw_HCDSB The lawyer spun on the witness he was using the testimony for his five minutes of fame and he asked that same question back. Tik Tok made jokes of the TMZ employee saying that...
@lawclass328@CPSSLaw2022@OJEN_ROEJ Personally I don't think whether they understand their actions or not is a reason they should be broadcasted. Many serial killers don't understand the impact of their actions during the trial. We should have respect for the victims families, don't turn THEIR life into a new drama