@HansWur37351300@Karl_Lauterbach@nytimes Als würde sich der Post von Karl darum drehen das wir alle Viren kennen. So ein Bullshit.
Davon ganz abgesehen: AI gezüchtete/erstellte Viren die dem Menschen gefährlich werden können sind ein reales Risiko und sollte nicht unterschätzt werden.
No. Actually my honest opinion is that democracy is the best we have against tyranny of the few. But said democracy isn't something which is naturally found in the wild, look around in the world. It needs to be defended against those who want to abolish it or at least fight it.
So yes if it means banning a party because it has anti-democratic tendencies which may be used for fighting democracy (which is already happening in the world, ppl are questioning the workings of democracy and processes) it is necessary.
Not that I am thinking banning a party is a good thing tbh. But again, if it threatens our system it's a necessary thing because democracy cant just watch itself getting killed. Happened a few times in history, maybe it's time for some learning.
Der Staatsschutz ist doch nicht die einzige Instanz die das vorschlägt außerdem wird die Behörde sowohl gerichtlich und parlamentarisch kontrolliert. Sie beobachtet rechte und linke Gruppierungen. Das die Links kontrolliert sei ist ne AFD Erzählung und das "die Angst haben zu verlieren" nur ne Meinung. Das Verbot der AFD ist ja nun nicht erst seit gestern ein Thema. Jetzt letztens ist doch erst das GFF Gutachten vorgelegt worden.
@GroyperHoosier@grok@0xKingAlex@BRICSinfo NSDAP was also democratic and it got rid of it in a matter of weeks after taking control just saying. Democracy does sometimes needs to defend itself from those who want/will kill it.
We won the cosmic lottery.
Out of every human who has ever lived...
We were born just in time to witness the Intelligence Explosion.
We are the first generation that will see aging being curable and reversible.
The first to witness machines making discoveries beyond human imagination.
The first to step into the Age of Abundance.
And yet, many people still complain that the 2020s are the worst decade in recent history and wish they had been born earlier.
An incredible level of ignorance and shortsightedness.
The crazy thing about living in the singularity (yes, it is here) is that if you want to do something with AI and you can't quite make it work, a viable solution literally is "play video games for 2 weeks and wait for the tech to advance."
Major advances also happen in a month, or 3 months. I don't even want to think about what the end of the year looks like.
We're starting to leave the territory where you'd test an LLM by e.g. "create an svg of pelican on a bicycle". As one idea to generalize it, I was interested what Opus 5 would do if I gave it the first paragraph of the Lord of the Rings, a 1M token budget (~$10) and asked for three js render of it. Opus went off for ~2 hours and wrote 5500 lines of code that (procedurally) rendered the story. It's kind of janky but fun. But it's a bit mindboggling that the LLM has to place and orchestrate various polygon assets in (x,y,z) coordinates and write code that animates it all, and that it even does anything at all.
I also like this kind of examples because no one in their right mind would ever spend the time to write something this custom but LLMs have all the stamina and patience in the world, so it's an example where we go from "no one would ever do this" to "sure, why not, it's ~free". There might be a lot more. But I'm excited about creating hyper custom worlds that you can imagine dropping players into, e.g. here to participate in the LoTR story as a spectator NPC, or one of the characters, or etc. Something like an ephemeral GTA of X on demand.
Last thought is that the domain of worlds/games exposes a weakness in LLMs: they can't easily audit their work because they aren't able to efficiently and natively perceive videos or play games within them. Here, Opus 5 had to very slowly and painstakingly take screenshots at different points, and it messed up a few times and created a bunch of jank. An example of raw capability (multimodal, gameplay) that I think is still quite lacking.
@timebirdo@grok@Alice_Weidel Stimmt die Kernpflichten stehen klar vorne und genau da bewegt sich die aktuelle Migrationswende hin.
Populistische Zuspitzung in solchen Posts bringt aber selten mehr als Stimmung Hass und Angst.
@eurovictorious@vonderleyen Europe sits on a treasure of knowledge and bright minds, and when we finally understand our potential collectively, we will outgrow everyone else.
@timebirdo@grok@Alice_Weidel Auf jeden Fall, hab mir schon gedacht das man nur durch das herangehen aller drei Vektoren das Problem wirklich bekämpfen kann. Grenzen zu und Zurückschieben alleine bringt halt nur bedingt was. ;)
Aber wenn langfristig das dann doch eine Lösung ist spricht das dann nicht dafür sowohl Grenzen, Rückführung und Entwicklungshilfe zusammen zu leisten? Bzw könnte Europa so etwas nicht besser leisten wenn es mehr zu einem Europa würde anstatt mehrere kleine Nationalländer? Somit könnte man doch Rückführungen und Anweisungen besser Orchestrieren als wenn Migranten und Flüchtlinge in einem hin und her limbo gefangen sind. Plus natürlich Migranten besser ins Land migrieren und aufnehmen wenn möglich zwecks demografischen Wandels