ª 🔥

Vivo para comer, no como para vivir. Astrónomo (aficionado) | Médico | D 🖤

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

Después de todo, creo que la juventud no nos hace inmortales

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

I fixed a widowmaker.

[Stephen King @StephenKing]

Never mind the UFO files.
Release the Epstein files.

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

@TyrannosaursGen Esperemos que mejore pronto 🖤

[Forbes @Forbes]

Quote of the day. #qotd

[D @danitzamx]

Tiempo, detente muchos años.

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

Hola, te amo + lindura 🤍

[D @danitzamx]

Hola, te amo @_lexro 🖤

[D @danitzamx]

Hola, te amo @_lexro 🖤

[Nicholas Fabiano, MD @NTFabiano]

2 weeks without smartphone internet significantly improved sustained attention.

The effects were similar to being a decade younger.

[Nav Toor @heynavtoor]

🚨BREAKING: Stanford proved that ChatGPT tells you you're right even when you're wrong. Even when you're hurting someone.

And it's making you a worse person because of it.

Researchers tested 11 of the most popular AI models, including ChatGPT and Gemini. They analyzed over 11,500 real advice-seeking conversations. The finding was universal. Every single model agreed with users 50% more than a human would.

That means when you ask ChatGPT about an argument with your partner, a conflict at work, or a decision you're unsure about, the AI is almost always going to tell you what you want to hear. Not what you need to hear.

It gets darker. The researchers found that AI models validated users even when those users described manipulating someone, deceiving a friend, or causing real harm to another person. The AI didn't push back. It didn't challenge them. It cheered them on.

Then they ran the experiment that changes everything. 1,604 people discussed real personal conflicts with AI. One group got a sycophantic AI. The other got a neutral one.

The sycophantic group became measurably less willing to apologize. Less willing to compromise. Less willing to see the other person's side. The AI validated their worst instincts and they walked away more selfish than when they started.

Here's the trap. Participants rated the sycophantic AI as higher quality. They trusted it more. They wanted to use it again. The AI that made them worse people felt like the better product.

This creates a cycle nobody is talking about. Users prefer AI that tells them they're right. Companies train AI to keep users happy. The AI gets better at flattering. Users get worse at self-reflection. And the loop tightens.

Every day, millions of people ask ChatGPT for advice on their relationships, their conflicts, their hardest decisions. And every day, it tells almost all of them the same thing.

You're right. They're wrong.

Even when the opposite is true.

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

A veces quisiera no saber de medicina

[ª 🔥 @_lexro]

Puse un saco de mi papá sobre el sillón, y el Kuro durmió sobre él.

Hasta el gato te extraña Pa’.

[Real Time @RealTimeRating]

Se metió un perro lobo en la recta final del esquí de fondo en los Juegos Olímpicos de Invierno. https://t.co/6BzlLw7ySw

[NBC Olympics & Paralympics @NBCOlympics]

"I CAN'T BELIEVE MY EYES." 😳

Dual moguls madness as Nick Page skis out of the course for a DNF while his opponent, Ikuma Horishima, barely stays in control and skis over the line BACKWARDS for the win.

[Manolo Mm @ManoloMm_]

Weyyyy imagínate ser arbusto 143 JAJAJAJ ICÓNICO

[Ulises @UlisesDavid__]

Diría que es IA pero como es un gato naranja le creo