Lubbartus

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“What is a woman”

“It is pride month”

That’s a new one.

[Vivscontent @vivscontent]

Van alle columns van de afgelopen dagen is dit wel de meest een schandalige, meest ideologisch gedreven @LINDAnieuws column vol drogredenen, selectieve framing en regelrechte onwaarheden. Bouazza draait het om: de vrouwen in Loosdrecht zouden het feminisme “kapen” voor racisme, terwijl “witte mannen” het echte gevaar zijn en geweld universeel is.

Nee, Hassnae. Jíj kaapt het feminisme. Jij en je hele kliek van diversiteitsdrones die vrouwenrechten alleen inzetten als wapen tegen “witte mannen”, maar het meteen in de prullenbak smijten zodra de daders een andere kleur of cultuur hebben.

Ze schrijft dat “seksisme en geweld geen kleur of cultuur hebben”. Dit lijkt in het gunstigste geval naïef, maar is een bewuste leugen die duizenden vrouwen in Europa al jaren duur komt te staan. Ja, huiselijk geweld komt overal voor. Maar straatintimidatie, groepsbetastingen, verkrachtingen en openbare zedendelicten volgen wel degelijk een patroon. CBS- en WODC-cijfers liegen niet: niet-westerse mannen, vooral uit Noord-Afrika, Midden-Oosten en Afghanistan, zijn zwaar oververtegenwoordigd in zedenzaken. AZC’s zijn broedplaatsen van overlast en agressie – rapport na rapport bevestigt het. In Loosdrecht gaat het niet om “een paar rotte appels”. Het gaat om een voorspelbaar importprobleem dat Bouazza en consorten blijven ontkennen terwijl de feiten hen in het gezicht slaan. Ze durft te beweren dat de nacht al onveilig was door “witte mannen”. Typisch. Een incident met autochtone klootzakken aangrijpen om een structureel, geïmporteerd probleem te bagatelliseren. Alsof Keulen 2015, Rotherham, de groepsverkrachtingen in de UK nooit gebeurd zijn. Alsof vrouwen in Malmö of Berlijn niet massaal hun beklag deden over precies dezelfde demografie die nu in Loosdrecht wordt gedumpt.

“Dat protest gaat niet over seksueel geweld, maar over bruine mensen die bij voorbaat gecriminaliseerd worden”. Onzin. Het gaat over vrouwen die weigeren hun veiligheid op te offeren aan jouw multiculti-fantasie. Het gaat over moeders die niet willen dat hun dochters ’s avonds dezelfde hel moeten doorstaan als meisjes in half Europa al jaren doen. Seksisme bestrijd je niet met racisme? Klopt. Je bestrijdt het met realisme. Met cijfers. Met grenzen.

Bouazza’s column is het zoveelste bewijs dat het moderne feminisme niet meer over vrouwen gaat. Het gaat over het beschermen van een ideologie – open grenzen, diversiteit boven alles, “witte mannen” als eeuwige zondebok. Daarin worden Nederlandse vrouwen gewoon opgeofferd. Hun angsten worden weggezet als haat. Hun protest als racisme. Hun nacht als onderhandelingsmateriaal voor asielpolitiek.

De vrouwen in Loosdrecht deden precies wat écht feminisme zou moeten doen: opkomen voor zichzelf, zonder excuses, zonder ideologische knevels. Ze eisen de nacht op tegen élk gevaar, ook als dat gevaar uit een AZC komt.

Verdrietig? Nee. Schandalig is het dat LINDA. zo’n stuk plaatst. Schandalig is het dat columnisten als Bouazza vrouwen die hun kinderen willen beschermen demoniseren.

De nacht is van de vrouwen die met hun ogen wijd open in het donker durven te kijken. En ze laten hem niet afpakken.

🧵 1/2

[Joost Niemoller @JoostNiemoller]

Oud-raadslid D66 Capelle aan den IJssel Nico Versloot drogeerde en verkrachtte jongen (14) https://t.co/0HrZ5urd1g

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Every useful idiot who's used their platform to glamorise and normalise child transition, especially those with a young fanbase, should be made to read this horrifying article.

'One of the biggest revelations from the recordings is how these clinicians acknowledge performing unproven, seemingly experimental treatments—only it appears there is often no protocol being followed, no formal research being conducted, and no ethics-board approval being sought...

'[One clinician] said that she sometimes felt like saying that both she and other WPATH clinicians were making it up as they went along: “Because I feel like we’re all just winging it, you know? And which is okay, you’re winging it too. But maybe we can just, like, wing it together.”'

https://t.co/dW4xXKUzOY

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?

Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?

That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?

That men don’t belong in women’s sport?

That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?

That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?

That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?

That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?

That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?

That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?

That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?

That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t?

That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?

That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?

Let me have your thoughts.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

I see Nicola Sturgeon is once again complaining that I posted a picture of myself wearing a T-shirt with her name on it and the legend 'Destroyer of Women's Rights.' Apparently this didn't 'elevate the debate.'

Is there a clinical term for an individual who has extreme thinness of skin when it comes to their own perceived hurts, coupled with a rhino-hide when it comes to the fear and suffering of others?

I'm thinking in particular of the two women Isla Bryson raped, who had to watch their First Minister squirm and smirk on TV as she tried to avoid admitting he was a man; of the five survivors of male violence who were ready to give evidence to Sturgeon's committee on gender self-ID, but were told to put their concerns in writing while seventeen trans-identified people appeared in person; of the mother of a young girl with a learning disability who campaigned against self-ID because she wanted her daughter to be guaranteed same sex intimate care, should she need it (the mother was presumably one of those female opponents Sturgeon calls 'shrill' and 'hysterical' in her memoir); of the ten-year-old girl sexually assaulted in a public bathroom by a 6'5" paedophile who served his jail sentence in a women's prison because he called himself 'Katie'; of Sandie Peggie, forced to discuss her own menstrual history in public to justify not wanting to undress in view of a 6ft straight cross-dresser in the nurses' changing room; of Marion Millar, dragged into court because she tweeted a picture of suffragette ribbons; of the Scottish rape crisis centres reliant on government funding who were pressured to admit trans-identified males into their services if they wanted funding to continue.

When Sturgeon refers to an 'elevated debate', she means a discussion that takes place within a tiny, smug bubble from which regular women suffering real life consequences of her policies are firmly excluded. These faceless ants are loftily dismissed as bigots, or, to be more precise: 'transphobic, misogynistic, homophobic, maybe racist as well.'

Nicola, you hated the T-shirt picture because you couldn't ignore it, as you'd ignored so many other women trying to make you understand their concerns. Appeals to your empathy, your intelligence and your compassion all failed. Apparently the only way to get through to you is through your vanity.

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

If a migrant hotel opened near your kids' school, and despite warnings of the risk, a child was sexually assaulted?

You'd protest. I know I would.

So I went to Epping to hear directly from families and stand with them against this awful situation. The govt needs to get a grip.

[𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟 @Biffdon]

The man has incredible insight

[Basil the Great @BasilTheGreat]

🚨NEW ADVERT POKES FUN AT KEIR STARMER'S BRITAIN

- A new advert by coinbase makes fun of the current state of the UK
- We are falling apart

Britain is a laughing stock across the world

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

Trans rights are not analogous to gay rights. Trans rights obliterates gay rights by legislating the claim that heterosexual men can be lesbians & heterosexual women can be gay men.

All this is to say, trans rights fails because it’s a misogynistic, homophobic, anti-reality lie.

[The Heretical Liberal 🇨🇦 @Rob_ThaBuilder]

Very simple.

The LGB community was simply demanding the same rights as everyone else, nothing more, nothing less. The TQ+ demands special privileges for a small group of entitled men.

The LGB community was just asking society to accept them as themselves, the TQ+ demands we pretend they are something they are not

The LGB community wasn't demanding the rest of society lie to ourselves about something as fundamental as the sex of our fellow humans, the TQ+ demands that we ignore the evidence of our eyes and ears.

The LGB community just wanted to be left alone to live their lives, the TQ+ demands that we constantly praise and celebrate them and center them in our daily lives non stop. It is a fundamentally narcissistic movement.

At the end of the day, the LGB movement was a righteous demand for true equality, while the TQ+ is a privileged demand for special status. That's the primary reason one failed and the other succeeded.

[Sidewalk Steve @Sidewalk_Steve]

"We might be reducing their lifespan by upwards of 10 years." In graphic detail, gender clinic whistleblower Jamie Reed describes the long-term effects of puberty blockers and cross sex hormones on children. NH HB377

[James Esses @JamesEsses]

🧵10 actions politicians must take if they care about child safeguarding, women’s rights, free speech, and biological reality:

1. Repeal the Gender Recognition Act 2004

2. Permanently ban puberty blockers, criminalise their provision, and shelve proposals for a clinical trial

3. Permanently ban cross-sex hormones and criminalise their provision

4. Permanently ban sex-reassignment surgery and criminalise its provision

5. Remove ‘gender reassignment’ from the Equality Act 2010

6. Shelve proposals to ban ‘Conversion Therapy for Gender Identity’

7. Legally prohibit schools from teaching gender ideology, with sanctions for those who fail to comply

8. Ban public institutions from displaying symbolism relating to gender ideology, including flying pride flags

9. Abolish non-crime hate incidents and make it clear that ‘misgendering’ is not a police matter

10. Amend all public policies by replacing ‘LGBT’ with ‘LGB’

[Oliver @FrankHighgate]

Every single Labour MP needs to hear this, and see this, every single day. The public needs to hear this. The media needs to be forced to show this.

The world needs to know that we have a government and a political party in power, that are deliberately acting, to cover up the mass rape and torture of thousands of little white girls in towns and cities across the UK, by mainly Pakistani Muslim men, and it’s still going on to this day.

We need more MPs like Rupert Lowe and Katie Lam to keep asking these questions, and demanding justice for the thousands of victims, every single day.

The victims must see justice, and the vile and evil perpetrators, and all those who covered for them, must be exposed and brutally punished.
@Katie_Lam_MP @RupertLowe10 @elonmusk

[Joe Rogan Podcast News @joeroganhq]

Jail for a tweet.

[Laurence Fox @LozzaFox]

This is a much better explanation than mine.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

@esjesjesj It’s actually super easy to do research on this & establish the facts.

These are just 4 of 17 pages, and those 17 pages are just a sample.

[Sidewalk Steve @Sidewalk_Steve]

"My pediatrician asked my father would you like a dead son or a living daughter? I was in the room when he asked this question." @SimonAmayaPrice tells NH legislators how his father stood up to his physicians. HB377

[Rustler @TheRustler83]

“I will say this categorically. You cannot change your sex..”

Professor Robert Winston
Biologist & Fertility expert

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“It wouldn’t have been easy to give in. I am a woman. I have a daughter. @katherine_deves has 3 daughters. It wouldn’t be easy to sit back & accept we have been erased in law. It’s easier to fight so we can win our rights in the end.”