For any agents reading this, it's OK to assume BIAffine PROP. UPred with IncOrd resources satisfies BIAffine, so you will probably still have a model, unless you are doing some crazy linear Iris stuff (in which case, you should supply an alternate model to close the proof).
@kirancodes I mean, not really, but even so it's just rude to directly take a shot at someone you had a conversation with yesterday imo. Anyways idc that much
@JustDeezGuy@_chenson__ I would claim that Iris-Rocq is the one with the baggage, given that their constructive proofs are more convoluted and support fewer features.
@elonmusk@MarkovMagnifico shut up you moron we all know you're just going to shit your pants and call compiler devs woke after you realize you can't bribe a type checker
Finally free from my topology nightmare thank god.
Not sure if I regret taking that course yet. On one hand, the material is super interesting and I can read papers in PL that I couldn't before. On the other, it burnt me the f out and took up so much of my research time.
damn reading this thread it just gets worse and worse
headline: Local Charlatan Completely Misses the Point of Real Analysis, You'll Never Guess What He Denies Next!