Never mind the ethics of AI use, we need to establish the etiquette. Inviting me to read LLM-generated text without telling me that's what it is, as though you'd written it yourself, is _rude_
your critique of ai cannot be entrenched in aesthetics because there will be a time when you see an ai image or hear an ai song and think "that looks/sounds good". your critique of ai must always be entrenched in the poisonous effect it has on people's brains and the planet.
I need people to understand, AI can't read, it can't understand your question. It uses pattern recognition. If you're using it for research, its not research, its selective and biased results based on pattern matching, if there's no pattern it fills the blanks with false info.
People on here will ask “Is it too late to start over at 28?” and everyone will reply “Yikes. Hate to break it to you gramps but it was over for you 10 years ago.” Meanwhile my 63 year old neighbor is taking the bar exam because he has a list of pharma companies he plans to sue
empezando un libro que encontré hace poco y que decidí llevarme porque me gustó la portada y me gustó el título. resulta que es el diario de la escritora durante los años de su divorcio. primera página: «mirar algo por última vez es lo más parecido a verlo por primera vez»
someone once told me “emotional intelligence is the discipline of sitting with a feeling long enough to understand it before you hand it to someone else” and that honestly changed how i move.
No es por nada, pero si vais en el coche y oleis algo así como huevos podridos, y abrís el capó y el olor es más intenso, llevad el coche a un taller que es la batería perdiendo líquido y no queréis que se sobrecaliente y explote 😇