We replaced a $750K/year marketing team with 24 TikTok Shop AI Agents.
No actors.
No shoots.
No ghost creators.
No wasted samples.
Just 300+ shoppable TikTok videos per day going live on autopilot.
Hereโs the exact workflow we use for 8-figure TikTok Shop brands ๐
Step 1 โ Find what already works
Use Manus to:
- Find winning products
- Pull proven hooks & angles
Use Fastmoss + Kalodata scrape top-performing TikTok Shop videos in your niche
See which creatives actually drive GMV (not just views)
Output: A list of top hooks, angles, and formats to copy.
Step 2 โ Build AI โcreatorโ profiles
Spin up 24 AI creator accounts (we treat each as its own โagentโ):
Each has a clear avatar (mom, gym bro, esthetician, student, etc.)
Each profile is positioned around one product line or problem
Output: 24 creator-style profiles ready to post shoppable content.
Step 3 โ Turn winning angles into 300+ videos/day
For each Agent, we give 1 prompt that includes:
- The niche
- The brand
- The best hooks & angles from Step 1
Use AI tools to create the content:
Creatify / Arc Ads / MakeUGC โ full AI UGC-style videos
Nano Banana Pro โ product & lifestyle images
HeyGen is great for the advanced stuff
Output: 300+ TikTok Shop-ready videos per day
Cost per video: ~$5โ$8 vs $50โ$100 for human creators.
Step 4 โ Autopost across a โcreator swarmโ
Use Reel Farm / Base44 / n8n to:
Schedule & autopost content across all 24 agents
Rotate formats (hooks, intros, CTAs) daily
Keep each account active without manual uploads
Output: Hundreds of shoppable videos posting 24/7 with no human bottleneck.
Step 5 โ Double down on winners (MPS method)
Every week we:
Check which videos drove the most GMV / clicks / watch time
Clone those winners into 20โ50 variations
Push them across more AI agents & more platforms (the Multi-Platform Swarm)
Everything links back to your TikTok Shop product page.
Result:
- ultra low CPMs
- 100โ200 shoppable videos live per day
- GMV that compounds because posting never stops
An โalways-onโ creative system that doesnโt get tired or wait on creators
The $300/month stack that replaces a $50K+/month creative budget
- Manus โ product research & viral hooks
- Kalodata โ TikTok Shop data & creator scraping
- Fastmoss โ competitor content & winner tracking
- Creatify or similar โ AI UGC videos
- Nano Banana Pro โ AI images
- Reel Farm / Base44 / n8n โ autoposting & workflows
This is the AI Creator Agent Method we plug into 8-figure TikTok Shop brands.
I documented the full 24-Agent System (prompts, workflows, tools, dashboards).
Comment โAgentโ and Iโll send you the whole thing.
(Must be connected)
PS: Repost if you want early access to the full 24-Agent TikTok Shop stack.
@ryancohen could we deploy our Livestream auction and buy now technology in all franchises to optimize staff off-peak hours and maximize online presence of GameStop and micromania internationay by the end of third quarter ? [email protected]
Join Us in Vigo for #DjangoConEurope 2024! ๐We're excited to announce that we'll be in beautiful #Vigo all week for #DjangoCon! This is a fantastic opportunity for all Django enthusiasts to connect, share ideas, and make this DjangoCon Europe unforgettable
@Xavier75 Mon pรจre se plaint de passer a 50 euros par mois avec sa petite retraite, ya de l รฉvolution dans les prix de votre cรดtรฉ ? Ou ya des forfait tout compris moins cher
# On the "hallucination problem"
I always struggle a bit with I'm asked about the "hallucination problem" in LLMs. Because, in some sense, hallucination is all LLMs do. They are dream machines.
We direct their dreams with prompts. The prompts start the dream, and based on the LLM's hazy recollection of its training documents, most of the time the result goes someplace useful.
It's only when the dreams go into deemed factually incorrect territory that we label it a "hallucination". It looks like a bug, but it's just the LLM doing what it always does.
At the other end of the extreme consider a search engine. It takes the prompt and just returns one of the most similar "training documents" it has in its database, verbatim. You could say that this search engine has a "creativity problem" - it will never respond with something new. An LLM is 100% dreaming and has the hallucination problem. A search engine is 0% dreaming and has the creativity problem.
All that said, I realize that what people *actually* mean is they don't want an LLM Assistant (a product like ChatGPT etc.) to hallucinate. An LLM Assistant is a lot more complex system than just the LLM itself, even if one is at the heart of it. There are many ways to mitigate hallcuinations in these systems - using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to more strongly anchor the dreams in real data through in-context learning is maybe the most common one. Disagreements between multiple samples, reflection, verification chains. Decoding uncertainty from activations. Tool use. All an active and very interesting areas of research.
TLDR I know I'm being super pedantic but the LLM has no "hallucination problem". Hallucination is not a bug, it is LLM's greatest feature. The LLM Assistant has a hallucination problem, and we should fix it.
</rant> Okay I feel much better now :)