@DivyanshVo40791@TheRealAmit_@notsokhushh he clearly had a hallucination after killing rehman. it's human psychology, a conflict of morality. a spy is a human. you expecting spies to act like some robots lol
@TheRealAmit_@notsokhushh she cried because she was homesick. didn't hamza cry while eating that food? how tf does that whitewash pakistan in any way? you really can't differentiate between inernational politics and personal human emotions
a bus every 6-7 minutes is the entire secret of good transit. no schedule, no app, you just show up. the kids have been screaming the answer at us for over a year. six seveeen. headways. they're talking about headways
Stop the overrated PR please... Enough is enough
Nehru ji inherited a nation devastated by Partition, poverty, refugee crises, and the monumental task of building institutions from scratch. @narendramodi inherited a functioning democracy with established institutions, highways, airports, PSUs, armed forces, and an economy already set in motion.
Don't compare the man who built the foundation with the man who inherited the house.
Nehru's vision was to unite India. Today's politics thrives on dividing Indians by religion, caste, and language. India's greatest strength has always been United we stand, divided we fall.
12 years of propaganda can never erase history.
#12YearsOfModi #Nehru #IndiaFirst #UnitedIndia #StopThePR
In 2005, when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh visited JNU, a section of students greeted him with black flags and slogans of protest. The university administration issued notices to students and considered disciplinary action.
In his speech, Singh invoked Voltaire:
"I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it."
When the administration moved against the protesters, Singh reportedly intervened. Years later, then Vice-Chancellor B.B. Bhattacharya recalled the Prime Minister's message to him. "Please be lenient, Sir."
What stands out is not that a Prime Minister defended the right of students to protest against him. What stands out is that we now regard such conduct as exceptional when it should be the minimum standard in a constitutional democracy.