Saw this in a job ad and laughed
As if ex-Tesla/SpaceX engineers would actually want to join your startup - especially with much stronger competitors in the space - never mind whether you could afford them
@DrPhiltill Optimus is the biggest variable imho - a semi-autonomous one could get lots done on the Moon, with an operator taking over remotely for the tricky cases. Although the ~3s RTT would make teleop pretty finicky
@MoritzW42 Adding an indicator to the statusline after this, something weird seems to happen once/week
@AnthropicAI resetting usage limits when this happens should be the standard
Claude: this refactor is probably overkill, better to wait until phase 6 lands next quarter
Me: bro there's no quarter, this ships this week
Silly how it weighs architectural decisions in man-days unless told otherwise - effort is not the scarce part anymore
@codetaur At times it feels like shaping clay that can suddenly turn liquid and lose coherence
the model seems to first hype me, replying with "now you're asking the real question"
and the moment I add just a bit of nuance or reframe, it will go "omg this changes everything"
DoorDash CEO and co-founder @t_xu explains what he looks for when hiring:
"A bias for action."
"Christopher Payne, our first chief operating officer, I didn't ask him a single interview question, but after a two-hour discussion about our logistics algorithm, he went home that night, it was Friday, drove with his son for four hours doing deliveries."
"I didn't ask him to do that."
"I also didn't ask him the next morning to write me a 3,000 word email about why our logistics algorithm sucks."
"This is certainly beyond the resume."