T-ch

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@DavidBCollum Hey Dave, would it be a bad idea to have Tom Luongo debate with Simon Dixon on whether Trump is saving America or Selling America out? You described both as encyclopedias of knowledge maybe develop some topics that will steer the conversation to that rather than City of London?

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@Battlefield Also is it possible to just have two zoom options for the 1-6 variable scopes (1x and 6x only)? I find going through all variables just to switch from 1 to 6 doesn’t keep up with the pacing of infantry combat and prevents me from winning gun fights

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@Battlefield Hey, I was wondering if you guys could expand on the optic options for the assault rifles to include the optics used by the DMR/Sniper? I think it would be pretty cool to make MK12 using the new M16.

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@camelfinance @cantonmeow

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@MrProWestie I wish they would lower the attachment points by a little bit to allow us build tacti-cool loadouts

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

https://t.co/Rbo9TxnYui

#Battlefield #DICE #BF6 Please fix the bipod system or bring back the bf1 bipod mechanic where it automatically deploys

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

2042 skins are back on the menu boys https://t.co/OG3ZAHv7kI via @YouTube

@Battlefield @BattlefieldComm

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@BattlefieldInte Did they remove the option to attach lpvos for carbines when the full game launched? I seen old videos of the beta and saw some carbines with different options for lpvos rather than just the one. Why did they do that?

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@DipWheeler I’m dying 😂

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@Kev_Capital_TA @uahe_official You enjoying BF6? I’m having a great!

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@StodehTV Is it possible for a map update to completely destroy the building or could EA add a “dread naught” feature like BF1 to counter players in high elevation areas?

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@akaCurt It’s going to be okay 👍

[luda @probablyluda]

Proof of Work (PoW) isn't just about securing blockchain networks; it's a system that profoundly ties digital currency to tangible, real-world assets. Here's how:

People & Infrastructure: PoW requires a significant human effort beyond just running code. People are needed to maintain hardware and facilities involved in mining operations. This includes IT specialists, security personnel, and facility managers, all contributing to a real economy where jobs are created, and skills are in demand. Unlike Proof of Stake (PoS), where the economic model relies more on holding assets than on active participation, PoW directly employs individuals in the maintenance and operation of mining facilities.

Land: Mining operations require physical real estate. Whether it's a small room with a few machines or vast warehouses filled with thousands of ASICs, land is crucial. This demand for space can drive economic activity in terms of real estate development, leasing, and even urban planning to accommodate such facilities. PoW thus directly contributes to the utilization and valuation of land, linking the digital to the physical world in a way that PoS does not, as staking doesn't require physical space in the same manner.

Power: The energy consumption of PoW mining is often criticized, but it also underscores its real-world impact. The power required to mine is not just a cost but an asset in itself, highlighting the need for efficient energy solutions. This has led to innovation in renewable energy usage, from miners establishing operations near hydropower or solar farms to reduce costs and environmental impact. The energy aspect of PoW makes it inherently tied to the real-world energy market, unlike PoS, where energy consumption is significantly lower and less tied to physical infrastructure.

Hardware: PoW necessitates regular hardware updates to stay competitive, driving technological innovation in computing power and efficiency. The hardware involved, from GPUs to specialized ASICs, creates a market for tech companies to innovate, produce, and sell mining equipment. This cycle of hardware purchase and replacement keeps technology advancing and ties the blockchain directly to the hardware industry, contrasting with PoS where hardware investment is not as critical for network participation.

Contrast with Proof of Stake:

Proof of Stake (PoS), while efficient and less resource-intensive, lacks these direct interactions with real-world assets. PoS operates more on the principle of holding currency to influence network decisions, which doesn't demand the same level of physical asset interaction. While PoS can be seen as more environmentally friendly due to lower energy requirements, it also means fewer real-world economic activities and innovations driven by the need to maintain mining operations.

In essence, Proof of Work isn't just a security mechanism; it's a bridge between the digital realm and real-world economics, fostering jobs, land use, energy innovation, and hardware development. These aspects make PoW not only a method for consensus but a significant driver of tangible economic activity.

[mitsuri @0xmitsurii]

20 years ago Youtube founders were depressed cause they only had 40 uploads.

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

https://t.co/g92cD8YI9H

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@grok @InternetH0F So what concepts/topics in order to learn more about this, I am interested in making something like this

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@cspan @RepAOC @AOC @camelfinance didn’t you have a chart for this?

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@calic415 Hello,

I was wondering if you could DM me about the issues you encountered accepting Dogecoin at your physical store? I am currently working on some hardware that aims to improve transaction speed and blockchain security for Dogecoin while keeping it PoW. Thanks!

[T-ch @_t_ch123_]

@Milko_4 @camelfinance “Tell that to the bond market”