"Expectations Investing" by @mjmauboussin and Al Rappaport showcases an unconventional, yet powerful method to find the value of a stock called Price-Implied Expectations (PIE).
Here is a breakdown of what it is and how it is used with $CLFD as a case study: 🧵
$ELMD, small med-tech company, reported strong Q2 performance with record revenues and operating profit.
Below is a link to my initial write-up on the company.
Ben Graham illustrated the market's behavior as a pendulum, swinging between excessive optimism and unjustified pessimism.
Knowing where we are at in the swing is critical to minimizing risk and capturing return.
Here are a few barometers according to Howard Marks:
Economy: Vibrant or Sluggish?
Outlook: Positive or Negative?
Lenders: Eager or Reticent?
Capital markets: Loose or Tight?
Capital: Plentiful or Scarce?
Interest rates: Low or High?
Investors: Optimistic or Pessimistic? Eager to Buy or Rushing for the exits?
Recent performance: Strong or Weak?
Asset prices: High or Low?
Prospective returns: Low or High?
Popular qualities: Aggressiveness or Caution?
@BrianFeroldi price-anchoring is a common behavioral bias: "Stock price rising = great company" and vice versa.
Yet the best opportunities are usually when price and fundamentals diverge.
One fundamental trait of great investors is second-level thinking.
First-level: "It's a good company. Let's buy the stock."
Second-level: "It's a good company but everyone thinks its a great company, and it's not. So, it's overvalued."
$PAYS Paysign's Patient Affordability solutions help alleviate costs for both patients and pharma manufacturers by identifying claims impacted by Copay Maximizers.
Paysign's Pharma segment sales have averaged triple-digit growth the past 4 quarters as a result.
Paysign $PAYS is driving a dramatic revenue mix shift to its Pharma segment (which generated an avg of 230% growth the past 4 Qs) as its Patient Affordability solutions ramp.
Yet its stock has tumbled 40% the past 4 months.
The CFA Institute's Financial Analyst's Journal completed a study on the impact of Seeking Alpha articles across two categories:
1. Influence (stock price reactions, popularity)
2. Predictive value (abnormal returns over 3-12 months) of Seeking Alpha articles
The study found that...
- 13% of SA authors were "skilled" with abnormal returns
- The main variables driving predictive value were ideas contrary to professional analysts, "skin in the game", and use of more technical finance terms
- Influential, attention-grabbing articles underperformed
- Readers tend to react and trade more on attention-grabbing articles, causing underperformance
https://t.co/M9pAseLG0e
A few types of typically successful investments:
1. Stock price diverging from business fundamentals
2. Company going from hated to tolerated
3. Under-appreciated growth catalysts
4. Under-followed to institutional coverage
“Skepticism and pessimism aren’t synonymous. Skepticism calls for pessimism when optimism is excessive. But it also calls for optimism when pessimism is excessive.”
- Howard Marks