Johor Darul Ta'zim Club 🇲🇾 has ordered me to delete my post and publish another one within 24 hours stating that the club – and, above all, its owner, the Regent of Johor – has nothing to do with any of this, failing which I face attacks and legal action
Firstly : intimidation may work on some people, but I have not backed down in the face of international paedophile networks (which have led to the imprisonment of dozens of coaches and officials across the sporting world), so if you think you can intimidate me with this, you can try again.
Secondly : I was referring to the Malaysian Football Association, not your club specifically. Are some of the players sanctioned for false licences part of Johor? Yes (Irazabal, Figueiredo or Hevel). Does that imply that Johor is responsible for the trafficking? No, but on the other hand, Johor may well have inadvertently breached the rule on the number of foreign players allowed in a Malaysian Super League match
Take the match against Negeri Sembilan, where those three players featured, plus the Brazilians Jairo and Bergson, the South Korean Park, the Malian Sidibé, the Spaniard Arribas, and the Azerbaijani Israfilov
There were more than six foreign players on the pitch (seven in the starting line-up), so why didn’t the federation strip them of the victory? The sanction is INTERNATIONAL, so Malaysia Super League must also be affected
Nothing more, unless your club is above the law?
No ill will
Keep the faith !
Imam at Taraweeh just said ‘last few rakats are gonna be led by the younger lads, we need to get some minutes under their belts’
Unc moving like a PL gaffer 😭😭😭
You will never see this on FOX News or CNN:
"They killed my father... whoever wants to forgive his killer, I will not let their blood go." Powerful, raw, and uncompromising anger. The calls for retribution are deafening.
Iranians saying they will finish the war
At this point, I am amused that not a single apology or remorse or regret, let alone accountability and consequences from FAM on the CAS ruling.
In fact the 7 players were defended harder than any average Malaysians and also more than some pro local footballers. Amazing.
They illegally bomb another country without any justification, for the second year running, and then they put out videos as if they’re the innocent victims. Beyond parody.
🚨| Sir Lewis Hamilton travelled to Jordan last month to meet teams from the Jordan Red Crescent and the Palestine Red Crescent Societies, hearing directly from those working tirelessly to support people in Gaza.
From the British Red Cross:
You know what is so frustrating about this draw…
This is actually just a freak result. Two shots cleared off the line, hit the woodwork twice, goal incorrectly ruled out, and still scored twice while conceding a freak OG and worldie.
But, when’s it’s put alongside all the other results in the last 10 weeks, it feels like absolute SHITE.
No, it’s not the pinnacle of Islam. You’re already starting from the wrong place. The black stone isn’t the Kaaba, and the Kaaba isn’t the black stone. They’re not the same thing.
The Kaaba is just the building Muslims face in prayer. That’s all. No one worships it. The black stone, Hajar al-Aswad, is just an ordinary stone, a relic.
Alhaji? That’s not from Allah. It’s a social title for anyone who has done Hajj. It means you completed one obligation if you could. Nothing more. It doesn’t make you smarter, more righteous, or spiritually perfect. Plenty of Alhajis can’t even quote five verses of the Quran properly, and many great scholars never carried the title.
Islam isn't about travel or touching stones. True peak is your character, your justice, your mercy, your honesty, and your obedience to Allah, even when no one is watching.
Hajj doesn’t make you a better Muslim. It’s worship. Alhaji is just people talking. That’s why it’s the last pillar, for those who can afford it, not a measure of faith or status.
The moment someone ran out of arguments, they reach for racism.
That alone exposes the strength of their position.
You called me an "arrogant Asian" because you could not answer a single historical point I raised.
You reached for ethnicity because chronology defeated you.
You dragged identity into the debate because the facts were not on your side.
That is not intellect. That is collapse.
Now, to your only attempted "argument":
1. "Israel is archaeologically dated to ~1200 BC."
Then explain this:
If Israel is a continuous state from 1200 BC, why did it disappear for two millennia from every map, treaty, diplomatic record, census, and political reality?
Archaeology does not grant modern sovereignty.
Bones do not write deeds.
Ancient pottery does not authorize expulsions.
If Bronze Age artifacts create modern entitlement, then:
Greece should reclaim Turkey.
Italy should reclaim France.
Iran should reclaim half the Middle East.
Vietnam should reclaim southern China.
Native Americans should reclaim the entire United States.
You do not apply this logic anywhere else.
You apply it here because it is the last refuge of a political project running out of moral oxygen.
2. "What gives you the right to speak?"
History.
Evidence.
And the fact that racism is not a credentialing system.
You think geography determines truth?
Then only Romans could write about Rome, only Germans about Hitler, only West Africans about slavery.
You mistake personal insecurity for authority.
3. "No skin in the game."
I come from a people who defeated three empires in one century.
We know exactly what it means to be carved, partitioned, occupied, displaced, and rewritten by foreign powers who insisted we had "no right" to speak about our own land.
If anything, it is precisely that history that gives me clarity and more "skin in the game" than anyone defending displacement as destiny.
And the irony is astonishing:
You accuse me of meddling in the Middle East while defending a project built entirely on meddling in the Middle East.
If only those with "skin in the game" could speak, then every American, European, and Israeli diplomat should pack up and leave tonight.
Silence is complicity.
The world has a responsibility to speak when civilians are being displaced, starved, bombed, and erased.
Apartheid is not a local lifestyle choice.
Ethnic cleansing is not an internal affair.
International law does not come with ethnic exemptions.
And most of all, Palestinians’ humanity is not negotiable, regional, or tribal.
Now let us return to the questions you ran from:
Who lived on the land in 1880?
Who held the deeds?
Who planted the orchards?
Who built the villages and owned the farmland?
Who had demographic continuity?
Who was expelled before the war even began?
Who mapped another people’s homeland into partitions they never consented to?
You answered none of it.
Instead, you fled for insults, archaeology, and geography, the last tools of someone who cannot defend what happened in 1948.
So let me end this clearly:
When someone abandons history for racism,
And abandons facts for mythology,
And abandons argument for insults,
It means one thing:
The truth defeated them long before I ever replied.