There is no science that shows vaccines cause Autism ...except in these published studies which show vaccines cause Autism:
▪️ https://t.co/9PBis1NeN0
▪️ https://t.co/BnGp3LHpNY
▪️ https://t.co/GZg2u91uyH
▪️ https://t.co/HxyJhJ9eTU
▪️ https://t.co/UxGxKAQhcJ
▪️ https://t.co/pMF2i9yH4L
▪️ https://t.co/0gN0fSNtKK
▪️ https://t.co/d3fELVQ3bO
▪️ https://t.co/nerRN2PiFm
▪️ https://t.co/z3Jr3j1L4T
▪️ https://t.co/dfXwUj6L37
▪️ https://t.co/rsAb6yiTp6
▪️ https://t.co/T7FGd5W39O
▪️ https://t.co/WB7eA9gfwb
▪️ https://t.co/CIApYvYcxV
▪️ https://t.co/gVt803ebzu
▪️ https://t.co/8aif6nRsWz
▪️ https://t.co/g8R2I7z9Rb
▪️ https://t.co/Ou4Op0TVgP
Causal relationship between vaccine induced immunity and autism
▪️ https://t.co/cm2GtMLmYG
... and autism being listed in the inserts....
I got my bonus today at work would love to be happy about it but, apparently the govt deserves half of it. Bonus is supposed to be merit based I'd like to know what the govt did for this bonus? I guess I own shares in Ukraine now!!!
🤬
For years, I raised alarms about dangerous gain-of-function research being farmed out to foreign countries, and I was told it was a conspiracy theory. Now, declassified documents show that the U.S. funded over 120 biolabs across more than 30 countries. Some of this research was conducted overseas precisely because scientists knew it would face scrutiny on American soil.
I'm calling for a presidential commission of scientists to review all gain-of-function research going forward. We're going lab by lab and pathogen by pathogen until the American people know the full truth.
https://t.co/gtv6sZ7viR
No, it’s not “Pride Month.” Not for me, and not for millions of others.
You’re welcome to be proud of whatever you want, in any month you like—because this is America. But what started in 1969 as a rebellion against persecution, morphed into a license for public depravity, and then morphed again into a weapon aimed at families and innocent children. Along the way it went from a day, to a week, and then a month and became official, and thereby effectively mandatory for all.
Enough!
If you’re gay and wondering why you are facing resistance now, the answer is that, with few exceptions, most of you didn’t stand up against the expansion and weaponization of “pride,” and the coercion that went with it. In that failure to resist, the gay community compromised any expectation that the rest of us should support “pride” at all, but especially the obscene display of hostility toward civilization and the families of which it is built, and for whom it exists.
If your hackles are raised by the idea that civilization is about families, realize that families are how civilizations persist through time. Not everyone needs to form one, but we all must respect and protect them—It is the foundation of what it means to be civilized.
For the small fraction of gays and lesbians who DID courageously stand up and resist expansion, coercion and the weaponization of “Pride,” I stand with you, and I have all along. But I won’t be celebrating, and I won’t be silent.
It’s not too late to join the voices of reason and to confront the insanity of what “pride” has become.
Let me trace the timeline here because nobody's connecting it.
Step 1: Scrape the entire internet. Every book, every article, every conversation, every piece of art, every forum post. Do it without asking. Do it without paying.
Step 2: Train a model on all of it. Call it "artificial intelligence."
Step 3: Go to BlackRock's Infrastructure Summit and announce: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter."
Step 3 is where you sell people's own knowledge back to them. On a meter.
They took the collective output of human thought, compressed it into a model, and now they want to charge you by the token to access a version of what you and everyone you know already created.
One Reddit user put it perfectly: "They stole all this data from us, the people, our life's work, creativity, art, by devouring the internet and blowing through all copyright laws. Now they want to sell it back to us in the form of a utility."
Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies.
That's the metered intelligence business model.
And they're pitching it to infrastructure investors as though they invented water.
A gene therapy given to a 13-month-old boy has, years later, led to a tumor in his brain after the virus carrying the gene inserted part of it directly into his DNA, researchers report.
The mass was safely removed, but his case appears to be the first time a gene therapy delivered directly into the body has been linked to cancer.
Learn more: https://t.co/PKqkpAauOR
BREAKING: LANDMARK PEER-REVIEWED STUDY FINDS VACCINATION IS A MAJOR RISK FACTOR FOR AUTISM
We found 79% of studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 of 136) reported evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link.
After DECADES of censorship and denial, our 50-page analysis of more than 300 studies provides one of the most comprehensive syntheses to date on the possible causes of autism.
The paper is now officially PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in the Journal of Independent Medicine.
Autism’s rise is multifactorial—but routine childhood vaccination emerged as a MAJOR modifiable risk factor within the broader causal framework.
We found potential determinants of new-onset autism before age 9 to include:
👵 Older parents (>35 years mother, >40 years father)
👶 Premature delivery (<37 weeks)
🧬 Common genetic variants
🧩 Siblings with autism
🔥 Maternal immune activation
💊 In utero drug exposure
☣️ Environmental toxicants
🦠 Gut–brain axis alterations
💉 Combination routine childhood vaccination
Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their components:
➡️ 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link
➡️ 29 reported “no association,” yet lacked unvaccinated controls and were riddled with major flaws
➡️ 12 studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. completely unvaccinated children found every time that the unvaccinated had superior overall health outcomes and substantially lower autism risk
Biologic mechanisms converged on shared pathways—including immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by clustered and early-timed vaccination during critical windows of brain development.
By evaluating all known risk factors side by side, this analysis uniquely clarifies the relative contribution of vaccination compared to genetic and environmental domains. No prior review has attempted this integrative scope without excluding positive vaccine-association studies or unvaccinated controls—an essential step in determining whether vaccines truly play a role in autism risk, and if so, how significant that role may be within the broader causal landscape.
This publication represents a major breakthrough through the longstanding censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s first major return to the peer-reviewed scientific literature in years—after enduring decades of attacks from the vaccine cartel.
CONCLUSION:
The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state.
Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination represents a significant modifiable risk factor for ASD within a broader multifactorial framework, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule.
@McCulloughFund@P_McCulloughMD@DrAndyWakefield@Honest_Medicine@CPriceRogers@KirstinCosgrove@NathanMeadPhD@BreCraven_PA@MilaLRad
He accomplished two important things with this line of questioning: 1) He exposed abortion for what it really is, stripping away the euphemisms that hide its barbarity, and 2) he revealed that abortion's proponents are too embarrassed and uncomfortable to have the conversation without the euphemisms because it makes them look monstrous. In other words, they care more about how they're perceived than anything else, including the wellbeing of innocent, defenseless babies. So they are, in fact, monstrous — and terrible at hiding it.
Very well done.
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Ok, I'm going to explain this simply.
Tylenol reduces glutathione. Glutathione is an antioxidant that highly mitigates inflammatory damage. If a mother has an illness during pregnancy, something called maternal immune activation (MIA) can occur in response. This is known to cause deleterious effects to fetal development. This is all well documented and not controversial.
If she takes Tylenol during this inflammation to reduce symptoms, it can also cause a reduction in the ability to mitigate the inflammation, which can exacerbate any potential fetal damage. There is a risk to benefit ratio in every medication. In this instance, the risk is fetal damage, and the benefit is reduction in symptoms. The risk outweighs the benefit.
Vaccines cause inflammation. That is, in fact, the goal. Create inflammation to generate an immune response. So pregnant women are given vaccines, which causes inflammation, and cause MIA, which potentially harms fetal development, and then are given Tylenol, which simply exacerbates the situation.
I really wish people would just look at these things from an empirical perspective and stop politicizing everything.
Feel free to look up anything I just said. It's all textbook medical knowledge.
For decades, doctors implored pregnant women to take extra care of themselves, avoid all drugs, toxic foods, get adequate rest, reduce workload, etc, because a developing fetal is exceptionally vulnerable.
Please stop spreading incorrect information that harms patients.
This should be headline news EVERYWHERE.
A Pfizer insider who was former head of toxicology in Europe has just come out and said something that many "conspiracy theorists" suspected.
He estimates that 20 000 to 60 000 people in Germany have died from the c*vid vaccine.
This was said at a parliamentary enquiry commission in Germany.
So why isn't this massive news being reported everywhere?
Is the mainstream media that has recieved millions in funding from Bill Gates deliberately covering this up... 🤔
Chris d'Entremont - 23,024 votes
Michael Ma - 27,055 votes
Matt Jeneroux - 30,343 votes
Marilyn Gladu - 26,292 votes
We're now at 106,714 Conservative voters disenfranchised by the Prime Minister Carney and the Members of Parliament themselves.
And don't tell me this is how our democracy works. In practice, it hasn't worked this way for 50+ years. Those voters reasonably expected to get Conservative MPs and now they're getting Liberals.
Mark Carney could possibly be the first Canadian Prime Minister in our history to achieve a majority government that nobody voted for. When this happens,we no longer have a Democracy.
This floor crossing BS is out of control. If MPs in this country can just change parties whenever they want, then voters truly have no control over who becomes prime minister and runs our government. The whole Canadian system is based on the premise that parties MATTER.
Public Health Agency of Canada took over the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) on April 1, 2026. The VISP domain now redirects to a federal website that calls it the “Vaccine Impact Assistance Program” and it has scrubbed all payout & injury statistics. Truly next-level.
Wow. They removed all the data.
Nothing says "safe and effective" like deleting all the injuries, right?
See? Now they can say, "there is no evidence of harm" (because we deleted it all).
New here? Welcome. Here's what we've documented so far:
🔴 $35.8M in taxpayer funds to companies the PM's wife advises
🔴 How Carney has been bleeding the economy since 2009
🔴 Air Canada CEO story connecting 2.1B$ directly to PM's Brookfield.
+ Much more. All in the Highlights tab.
This isn't about Conservative or Liberal.
This is about a financial architecture that was built to move public money into private networks — and Canadians deserve to see the receipts.
Everything I post is sourced to from official government websites, news outlets and parliamentary records. No speculation, just documentation.
The only way this reaches Canadians who need to see it is through you. Legacy media won't cover it. The algorithm will bury it. But screenshots in a group chat, a link sent to a friend, a conversation at the kitchen table — that's how this breaks through.
If this work matters to you, the most powerful thing you can do costs nothing — make sure someone who hasn't seen this, does.
🔔Turn on your notifications.
We're just getting started. 🇨🇦
This post barely scratches the surface.
Let me break this down so every single Canadian understands what’s happening to your money right now.
Your Prime Minister is a former central banker.
He ran the Bank of Canada.
He ran the Bank of England.
He co-founded the global framework directing $130 TRILLION toward a new financial system.
And right now, he is quietly building the infrastructure to replace how your money works — permanently.
Here’s the full picture:
(Every claim sourced. All receipts live.)
The more I read this, the more I realize how it is utterly illiterate.
How exactly do you decolonize someone’s birthplace? He lived there. No one came in and conquered his house. It’s just a house of a man that exists.
These people are exhausting
🙄