By request, I’ve turned my recent post on sex vs. gender identity into a short essay so it has a permanent home in my essay section on Substack and is easier to find, reference and share.
You Can Test for Sex. You Can’t Test for Transgender.
https://t.co/ewZHsM4vpV
Met Police saying they are dealing with 10k reg s*x offenders; a number growing by 100 every 3 mnth.
Google says the no. of male SO over 60 yo has grown by 243% in last 20yrs.
P*rn a major driver of both. UK p*rn generates £1bn + The industry needs to pay for it’s harms
7 months prior to torturing and murdering a 7 year old boy, he assaulted a woman by pulling a gun and punching her teeth out. Police only charged him w/ a misdemeanor. If he had gotten a felony, he would have still been in jail and not able to kill the boy https://t.co/9VutxUti2P
Well there was not a single trans black woman when we launched the UK Gay Liberation Front. It was mostly gay men with a few lesbians. Same in the US. Ask @FredSargeant.
The early transsexual rights organizations were explicitly homophobic. They saw us as sexual deviants and didn’t want to be associated with us. Later on, they saw they could do better by joining us. It was a tragic mistake for LGB groups to embrace “gender identity” - which is a sexist, anti-gay concept.
But we are reviving the LGB rights movement!
@lgbinternationl@AllianceLGB
Amidst the unbelievably offensive chat re brothels and men's 'needs', I just had word that a dear friend and colleague in the sex trade abolitionist movement has died. Had it not been for what men did to her during the time she was prostituted she could have lived to old age. 💔
ALC’s view of what makes a woman is classic misogyny which views women who are not being p*betrayed by men as nothing, something sub-human! So nuns, young v*rgins, & all not in relationships don’t count. Special misogyny for l*sbians who dare to have s*x that doesn’t involve men
The Jason Arday story has been delicious. But the problem goes well beyond race and academia. Would Andrea Long Chu, a vicious, porn-addled misogynist, really have won the 2023 Pulitzer Prize for Criticism if he hadn’t claimed to be a woman?
Woman-hate is widely regarded as a sign of edgy brilliance, and its totally acceptable so long as the man spouting it has changed his pronouns.
If I were @jk_rowling, I’d have very little patience left for actors becoming rich and famous from the world I created, then publicly virtue-signalling about how dreadful they think my views are.
Rowling created something that has given millions of children enormous joy and turned some pretty mediocre actors into global celebrities.
Yet some still queue up to denounce her while apparently being unable to answer the most basic question at the heart of this debate:
If safeguarding rules aren’t grounded in biological sex, what exactly are they grounded in?
Which serious journalist thinks: “Do you know what this discussion about macroeconomics really needs? The views of a drag queen!”
Imagine Paxman going along with this. No, I can’t either.
Even if only for the optics, the BBC might want to give the drag queens a rest for a while.
If your argument collapses the moment somebody asks you to define a word, answer a hypothetical or explain the unintended consequences of your policy, you don’t have an argument. You have a slogan.
You make a serious and important point…
….but you have also given me the hilarious mental image of a female identifying man forsaking his laptop for the evening and getting comfy on the sofa with a well-thumbed copy of The Second Sex 😂
It's astonishing to me that there are people who will write ad nauseam about how feminism and academic texts that hardly anyone has read, ie, Judith Butler, are responsible for men claiming to be women and forcing themselves into spaces where women and children are naked - while ignoring the influence of the most widely consumed form of media in the world - pornography.
The concept of a "girl cock" or "gock" as these men call it, didn't come from Simone de Beauvoir. These men didn't read the massive tome titled "The Second Sex" (not gender, ahem), and it didn't come from Butler's obtuse word salad, either.
What lies behind the transgender/transsexual movement has always been the determination of the male sexual drive, and beyond the profits to be made and the observable homophobia, first and foremost at its bare bones is the ugly hatred of women by men with sexual pathologies.
These men dress up as women and mimic us because they have for a long time watched pornography depicting women being degraded. In their actions, they imagine themselves as the humiliated women they see in porn, and they are telling us out loud what they want to do to us. To humiliate, dehumanize, and degrade us.
They get support from the highest institutions of society, including the WHO and the APA.
I wake up every day angry about this, but also, that this isn't obvious to everyone.
“It is impossible to separate the influence of pornography from the gender-identity movement, as both are aspects of the sex industry. The gender-identity industry sells ‘sex’ as a noun... whereas the pornography industry sells ‘sex’ as a verb.”
https://t.co/DrFoSFPCXf
Trans ideology is just a new name for the same old misogyny. If you think trans identified males are just trying to live as their "authentic selves, you're wrong. These men are trying to destroy the female sex class through coercion and force for their own benefit as males.
The pillory is ready in the town square in Moss, Norway.
The pillory was a form of public punishment. People were displayed in the town square while crowds spat at them, shouted at them and humiliated them. The point was not merely punishment. It was public humiliation.
The crowd was meant to participate in the degradation of the person locked into the pillory.
Everyone was supposed to understand what happens when you step out of line. That is how you teach a population to conform.
The pillory was abolished because such physical punishments were considered degrading, barbaric and incompatible with a more modern and humane justice system.
For the city of Moss the pillory has been brought back to the town square.
And right now, a young lesbian woman is in it.
Her “crime”? Building Moss Pride — a local initiative independent of the organization FRI. She and a few other volunteers wanted to create their own Pride programme in the city where they live — and have ownership of that programme.
They invited LHB Norge and Hungry Hearts to Moss Pride 2026.
And then came the backlash.
Not just from local activists and queer activists from Oslo.
Now local political parties and organizations have joined in.
Moss SV.
Moss Rødt.
HEF Moss.
And Rødt in Trondheim
The message is clear:
No LGB without T.
No lesbians saying that men cannot be lesbians at Moss Pride.
Not in our town.
The young lesbian woman in the pillory could take no more.
She has resigned, apologized and accepted blame.
She is stepping down as leader of the project she has spent four years building.
I understand why.
When a young person is left standing completely alone while the Moss mob tears her apart — and not a single adult steps in — it is not hard to understand why she wants to get away.
But a public pillory works differently today than it did in the 17th and 18th centuries.
Social media makes sure of that.
Choices made today can follow a person for years.
And the message from the Moss mob is clear:
Too little, too late.
What kind of community treats young, independent, free-thinking people like this?
Because this was ugly.
What happens to the next young lesbian, gay or bisexual person who dares to build something themselves — without T?
Who dares to create their own project and invite Hungry Hearts?
Who dares to organize a local Pride on their own terms?
Who dares to say:
“I want to decide what happens in the project I built.”
The pillory is ready in the town square in Moss.
@MossKommune@mossavis@lgbinternationl@AllianceLGB@ActiveLesbians@LesbianLabour@ScotLesbians@againstgrmrs@ThefantasticsL@WDI_UK
@Sorelle_Arduino Read this article too and sensed that she knows in her heart that the career ladder in this business goes down not up - what a bleak outlook
Hi @BBCLBicker , your piece elicits sympathy for single men in China, a country where men outnumber women by 3 million
Did you not think it worth flagging the femicide that led to this imbalance? Referring to China’s 1 child policy does not do it justice
https://t.co/uBuOcDLL6p
Cross dressing civil servants given more paid leave for their electrolysis & voice training than parents grieving their dead children
Tell me again how this group of men is the most vulnerable and the most marginalised
The fact that a man's emotional and psychological stability hinges on the full compliance of women, is one of the worst possible reasons to allow him to bypass women's safeguarding and boundaries.