@ps119ps@NJBeisner You must be Muslim, that is the only logical explanation for how you can't understand simple teachings from the Bible. You don't believe in the Bible's authority, there is no use in quoting it since you don't believe it anyways.
Repent for you follow a false god.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner You do not understand the Bible. You are trying to teach people false teachings. You claim those who follow Christ (Christians) are disgusting. You are not a believer and are using the Bible the same way as the devil. Just as a means to condemn others.
Repent and follow Jesus.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner I will just ignore you going forward as you aren't even Christian despite acting like you were originally. Just another atheist who thinks you know the Bible better then those who actually read it.
I pray your eyes are opened to Jesus one day before it's too late.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner Ok, this must mean you aren't Christian. No wonder you are not making sense. I have no clue what religion you follow but if you claim the Bible isn't our source of truth, then you cannot possible know who God is.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner Are you seriously arguing that the apostles teaching is contrary to Jesus? Are you saying the vast majority of the New testament is untrustworthy?
What argument are you trying to make? You are not making sense and it seems you are incapable of defending your position.
@SarahisCensored While I understand what you are saying, everything you fear it can lead to has already been happening. This is actually a response to what has been occurring in schools.
The woke ideology already operates as a religion and it's been spreading unhindered in many schools.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner That isn't using scripture to form a rebuttal. You are blindly saying I am wrong and falsely claiming I am removing something from scripture.
I've given you multiple clearly passages that say we are not under the Mosaic law. We are under the law of Christ.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner You are incorrect. No one removed anything from the law. We are no longer under it. The Bible is abundantly clear.
Romans 6:14 makes it clear. Acts 15 makes it even more clear. There is no debate or arguing that we are under the law. It is settled that we aren't.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner You made multiple strawmen arguments and didn't address anything I said with scripture.
We are under the law of Christ, that is different from the Mosaic law. The apostles made it abundantly clear we are no longer under the law with the council in Jerusalem.
@thestarsrcloser@_Bunchus@Dexerto Ok, either you are a bot or someone not all there in the head. You are just talking nonsense at this point and lashing out because you made a dumb point that was easily refuted.
This conversation obviously isn't fruitful, no need to continue it further.
@ps119ps@NJBeisner Being under grace does not mean she is free to do whatever she wants. Believers are not under the law of Moses, instead we under the law of Christ as Paul mentions in 1 Corinthians 9:21. 1 Corinthians 10:23 mentions not everything is edifying and we should avoid those things.
@SecondAmendment Here's a tough one, is a former Californian that moved to Texas and is a staunch 2nd amendment advocate more of a Texan then someone from Texas who is anti gun?
That might be taking it a little too far haha.
@thestarsrcloser@_Bunchus@Dexerto Such an ironic post as you didn't seem to comprehend anything I said. It's somehow none of my business but yet you decided to post it publicly online.
You deflected when I pushed back on your nonsensical post.
Perhaps you should not post if you don't want anyone to discuss it.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian But that also applies to humans. We cannot handle cold weather and the Bible doesn't mention anything about the climate in the garden.
That's the point, the Bible doesn't have to explicitly mention it if there is evidence we can look at to come to that conclusion.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian 3. So the biological reality of humans now has no bearing on what it was like then. It's the same for animals. God could have just as easily changed their anatomy as he did with the weather.
He could have also designed animals as being capable of eating meat even if they didn't.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian 2. There is no Bible verse that says the weather was perfect in the garden of Eden. We can infer it based on other scriptures but nothing specifically says that. In fact, God clothed them to cover their nakedness, not protect them from weather.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian 1. You are deflecting. Your original statement was that turtles having a shell as a defining feature helps prove animals always ate each other.
I then used your same logic to prove humans weren't made for cold weather yet they were clothes after they sinned.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian What do you mean? We don't know exactly where the Garden of Eden was, so how can you say that?
Considering there was a global flood, it could be somewhere completely different.
Also, how do you know it was warm during that period as no scripture explicitly says so?
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian Show me the scripture that says that. Of course, there isn't one and you would have to infer it was warm at that time as well (which I agree it was). That's the point, your argument is no different then the one you oppose. It uses the exact same logic and theological argument.
@PracticalTheolo@Curi_Christian That might make sense on the surface but it falls short if we apply it to humans. Humans did not wear clothing before the fall. Yet, our bodies are not designed to survive freezing temperatures.
How did Adam/Eve survive winter prior to the fall without clothing?