We are living in a time when it isn’t #bigbrother that we should be worried about, but #bigsister follow the thread to see what I mean
We’ve been worried about Big Brother
Dreading the violent mister
Not realizing there’s another
Quietly growing Big Sister
@SuzieSeeksTruth Yea it’s been wild to see so many who questioned the covid narrative fall into the camp “take your 13 prescribed meds and be a good little citizen.” It just goes to show how many of them lack critical thinking skills
🔥 THE LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL: WHEN QUESTIONING THE NARRATIVE MAKES YOU THE TARGET 🔥
I never intended to post about Lindsay Clancy’s trial. But after watching large MAGA accounts repeat claims that omitted important testimony and push a predetermined narrative, I couldn’t stay silent. I have always stood on one principle: Silence equals approval.
It reminded me of the COVID era. Emotionally charged talking points were repeated so relentlessly that many people began treating them as unquestionable facts. Anyone who asked for evidence was attacked rather than answered. This time, however, the attacks were coming from MAGA accounts. Either they were willing to distort or selectively present the facts to fit a predetermined narrative, or they were simply parrots 🦜 repeating what they had read without checking the facts for themselves. Both are bad.
At first, I was shocked. Then I became angry. I read comment after comment calling for this mother to suffer horrific deaths. Today, I even heard a Newsmax anchor say, “Well, she will never make it to heaven to see her kids,” clearly implying that Lindsay is going to hell.
No television anchor gets to decide another person’s eternal fate. That judgment belongs to God alone.
For questioning the popular narrative based on testimony, I have been called evil, labeled a liberal feminist, accused of defending child murder, and personally attacked. The post shared below is one example. I will not rewrite what I said, but I hope he reads it with the same anger with which I wrote it.
What has been most alarming is where much of this hatred is coming from: small and large accounts identifying themselves as MAGA Republicans. These are people who claim to value independent thought and question the government, the media, and Big Pharma. Yet when a woman questions a narrative they have accepted, she is mocked, insulted, and told to fall in line.
For the record, I am not a liberal feminist. I am a three-time Trump voter who still supports President Trump. I have been staunchly pro-life for more than 30 years, support MAHA, never took the COVID shot, and actively fight for election transparency, clean voter rolls, hand-marked paper ballots, and public hand counts.
I am not excusing what happened to Cora, Dawson, and Callan. I am asking a serious question:
What caused a loving mother to deteriorate so drastically in four months, and did her mental-health treatment or rapidly changing medications play a role?
That is not defending anyone. That is not excusing anything. That is asking whether we are willing to examine the full testimony instead of repeating whatever version spreads fastest online.
If our movement cannot tolerate honest questions without resorting to sexist memes, name-calling, personal attacks, and declarations about who is going to hell, then we are not thinking independently. We are being manipulated, and we are becoming no better than the people we claim to oppose.
Just like during COVID, when you are attacked simply for asking questions and presenting facts from a trial, that is when you had better keep asking them.
If Lindsay is truly the monster they say she is, why do they need to lie, omit testimony, or manipulate the facts to prove it? 🤷♀️
The truth should be enough.
Guys please listen
The chicks are not supporting Lindsey Clancy because they think it’s great that she killed her kids.
They’re mad at the mental illness industry and how it failed her.
Guys are reacting to this irrationally and emotionally.
Ironic, ain’t it?
Important: the defence’s star witness Dr Kirk Helibrun testified that when Lindsay Clancy awoke in the hospital, she had no idea what had happened and then was told what happened by someone else ie someone coached under diminished mental capacity to confess to the murders of her children
Lindsay couldn’t remember what had happened
Credit: Jessethebusinessmom
@Bqmbulu So the French men gave up really easily and didn’t want to fight the Nazis. But when it came to harass a bunch of women they didn’t protect (many of whom were basic rape victims), they were front and center
The Plymouth County, Mass. District Attorney's office should be ashamed of itself for putting on such a gratuitous spectacle. Showing off the clothes of the dead babies, passing around gruesome photos of their strangled bodies, forcing the father to sit through his anguished 911 tape, roping in the grandparents, police officers, EMTs to relive the horrible event for the entire internet to gawk at. They've probably emotionally scarred the JURORS for life. There is no rational reason why this matter needed to be resolved by the State in such a brutish way. NO ONE who had any standing to seek recourse here, namely the husband, wanted it. And now the government has shattered HIS privacy too. Not to mention, they've likely botched the case regardless -- so what the hell was it all for? This has been going on since January 2023. Staggering misuse of government resources. Everyone in a position of public authority who's responsible for this travesty needs to be ejected from office immediately. Starting with DA Timothy J. Cruz and ADA Jennifer Sprague.
@celestialbe1ng This is exactly what’s boggling my mind w/ the conservative take. They screamed at the top of their lungs that regular people must as questions of big pharma… all to now claim Lindsay should have been a good little citizen& take 13 meds that gave her immediate adverse effects?!
The Right going from the Covid vax gives you myocarditis and kills you and Pharma must be held accountable to „there’s no conceivable way 13 psychiatric drugs could injure a human brain badly enough to compromise agency or reality testing” has been absolutely fascinating to watch
Spoiler: psychiatric drugs can absolutely injure a human brain beyond the point of agency and reality-testing and we have seen many cases of that
@DisaffectedPod@michaelmalice They’re also the side the has been all about asking questions of big pharma and big government and suddenly they’re totally against asking any questions of the insane established timeline of that tragic evening? It’s so nonsensical
@DisaffectedPod@michaelmalice This is what’s driving me crazy about all these conservatives who are suddenly saying Lindsay should have been a good girl and taken all her 13 prescription meds EVEN THO she was immediately having adverse side effects. Wtf has gotten into them?
@ZubyMusic Whatever happened to nuance in conservative circles? Good god. You guys were the ones against big pharma during covid. Suddenly, everyone on the right is in lock step claiming Lindsay should have been taking her 13 meds and no one can ask any questions of the insane timeline
Women: hold a silent demonstration with the goal to bring awareness to postpartum mental health.
Men: hold an actual protest for brothers accused of rape, sex trafficking, and indecent images of a child.
Men absolutely defended him. They blamed his wife for surrendering his children to him in accordance with their custody agreement. Because if women protect their children from abusive men, it's "parental alienation," if they meet custody orders, she's responsible for his choices.
This is absolutely unhinged.
A horrific case involving one woman’s severe mental health crisis somehow leads to: maybe women shouldn’t vote and maybe women shouldn’t be allowed to freely interact online.
That isn’t an argument. It’s collective punishment dressed up as political commentary.
Imagine applying this logic to men. Every time a man commits an act of violence, should we reconsider men’s voting rights? Restrict their internet access? Of course not because we understand that one individual’s actions do not justify stripping civil liberties from an entire sex.
You can debate the Lindsay Clancy case. You can disagree about culpability, psychosis, treatment, or the legal standard for insanity. But using a tragedy as an excuse to suggest women deserve fewer constitutional freedoms is not serious thinking.
The 19th Amendment isn’t conditional upon women behaving in ways you approve of. Neither is our basic freedom to participate in public life.
@Patr6747Midi@coulterculture When it’s taken seriously that’s best case scenario. Unfortunately it sounds like many women haven’t been taken seriously hence their outrage. But this issue has taken on a sad polarization that really shouldn’t have happened
@Steel_Pulse1@SallowDawn@Cernovich No it isn’t. It’s the beginning only. He was having an affair from the details that came out. There’s more but you’ve refused to look into independently obviously so it doesn’t matter what I say
Reminder that these 4 cases alone were of July-Aug this year.
While men are generalizing women over ONE case, there are hundreds of men out there murdering their wives and kids every single day. Why are you moids silent about this?