Hey friends. In an attempt to get my writings around for those who are interested, you can find both my personal Substack as well as Missio Dei linked here. Any readership is appreciated.
https://t.co/vnTap1WygF
https://t.co/mB0iQ0owBM
@BackwardsFeet@LinchZhang For what it's worth, when I am writing my weekly Gospel reflections, and I pull a quote from Scripture, Grammerly always underlines the Scripture quote as AI-generated. It's pretty wild.
@adorientem@FrMatthewLC@dlendman2 Certainly not. The two acts are different in species. The church has continuously held that medical intervention, in the natural development process is allowed for the good of the whole.
@adorientem@FrMatthewLC@dlendman2 To my mind, there is an intrinsic and ontological union between the marital act as such, and the natural process that follows it. Thus, removing any part of it and artificially performing it would be a sin against that union.
@FrMatthewLC@dlendman2 Iโve likewise seen varying opinions on it. Iโve always given the negative when asked as you can never do an evil for a good. Seems implantation of the embryo would be contrary to the marital bond. Curious if you can explain how itโs not?