😁😁😁😉
نحن على علم بوجود بعض المشكلات التقنية التي تؤثر على عمليات السحب على المنصة.
فريقنا يعمل حالياً على حلّها، وسيتم استئناف الخدمات في أقرب وقت ممكن.
نقدّر صبركم وسنوافيكم بآخر المستجدات أولاً بأول
الصورة تقسم الفترات الاقتصادية إلى ثلاث دورات رئيسية متكررة
سنوات الركود (A)
الازدهار (B)
الأزمات (C)
تعتمد على أنماط تاريخية مع توقعات مستقبلية
حسب الصورة عام 2026 سيكون عام ازدهار (B) مع أسعار مرتفعة وهو وقت مناسب للبيع .
So @Uniswap just announced their UNIfication plan and it's probably the biggest structural change we've seen in their governance!
$UNI pumped about 35% after the announcement and it's quite understandable👇
Pure governance token + no cash flows ➝ Token with real economic value tied directly to protocol revenue
This is exactly what regulators and institutional investors have been asking for. The proposal does 3 main things. Here's what's actually happening and why it matters🧵
➠ They're burning 100M UNI tokens from the treasury right away
‣ Which is about ~10% of the total supply worth roughly $920M at current prices
‣ This is basically a retroactive burn representing all the fees they could have collected since launch if this system was always active
➠ They're activating the fee switch that's been sitting dormant in the code for years
‣ Instead of LPs getting 100% of swap fees, the protocol now takes a cut
‣ On V2 pools it's 0.05% (which is 1/6th of the standard 0.3% fee) & on V3 it varies between 1/4 to 1/6 depending on the pool tier
‣ All these protocol fees get used to buy and burn $UNI
➠ They're merging Uniswap Labs and the Foundation into one unified organization under a 5 member board
‣ The governance structure is getting simplified
‣ Setting up a 20M $UNI annual budget starting in 2026 for protocol development and ecosystem growth
➠ They're also introducing something called PFDA which stands for Protocol Fee Discount Auction.
➢ Lets traders bid for fee discounts
➢ Captures MEV that was previously being extracted by bots and searchers
➢ Those proceeds also go to burning $UNI
Remember V4 is becoming an onchain aggregator. Instead of just routing trades through Uniswap's own pools, it'll aggregate liquidity from other DEX's and collect fees on those external trades too. This massively expands the revenue model beyond just internal volume.
Now the obvious concern is LPs are getting a smaller cut of fees than before. On V2 their earnings drop from 0.3% to 0.25% which is about 17% less. The proposal tries to address this through the PFDA mechanism and better MEV capture, but historically when LP incentives change, liquidity can migrate to competitors. This is the main risk to watch.
Other DeFi giants which has been sitting on inactive fee switches in their code will try to implement this too imo. The timing matters too because Wyoming's DUNA framework that passed in August 2025 is what made this legally feasible for US-based DAOs.
If they burn 1.5-2% of supply annually and $UNI captures value from being deflationary + having actual yield mechanics, the compounding effect over @Uniswap next few years is substantial. This assumes trading volume stays stable or grows.
Create a portrait-oriented image of a detailed keychain doll held in the palm of a child's hand.The keychain character is a free-style miniature version of me, based on the attached image