building apps is fun.
marketing each one every day is the part i kept avoiding.
so i built @clipmyapp.
give it your website or a screen recording. it creates videos, memes and carousels from the actual product.
you approve. it publishes.
One website. One screen recording. A month in the feed.
ClipMyApp turns your actual product into organic videos, memes and carousels.
You approve. We publish.
We're live. Your first 20 posts are free: https://t.co/eYHxY2jdbu
7 months of building and every test has been on a site I own. That is not a real test.
So the next one is a stranger's site, chosen by random draw. I post what it finds either way.
Reply with your site if you want it to be yours.
giving away a full link campaign on your site. 2 backlinks, and you pay nothing.
Follow, then reply with your site and one line on what it does. Next Wednesday I draw one name at random, on video.
The winner gets the full backlink gap for their site, a ranked list of sites LinkIntel picked as good targets, and up to 2 of them turned into real links. I cover the fees.
5 more people get the gap report, free.
The condition: I post the whole thing publicly. What each site owner asked for, what they settled for, and whether the link went live. Most of what LinkIntel finds is not worth buying, and that part gets posted too.
Optional, and it helps me: the keyword you are trying to rank for, or the question you want ChatGPT to name you in.
Your site has to be live and have real content on it. No purchase necessary. Drawing Wednesday 19th.
giving away a full link campaign on your site. 2 backlinks, and you pay nothing.
Follow, then reply with your site and one line on what it does. Next Wednesday I draw one name at random, on video.
The winner gets the full backlink gap for their site, a ranked list of sites LinkIntel picked as good targets, and up to 2 of them turned into real links. I cover the fees.
5 more people get the gap report, free.
The condition: I post the whole thing publicly. What each site owner asked for, what they settled for, and whether the link went live. Most of what LinkIntel finds is not worth buying, and that part gets posted too.
Optional, and it helps me: the keyword you are trying to rank for, or the question you want ChatGPT to name you in.
Your site has to be live and have real content on it. No purchase necessary. Drawing Wednesday 19th.
this is one decision LinkIntel had to make:
the domain was strong, but the project fit was only partial. because it was a guest post, LinkIntel could write a fresh article around our topic, so it moved forward and negotiated the price from $100 to $60.
would you want the agent to ask for approval here, or continue on its own?
#requestforfeedback
LinkIntel found a DR 51 publisher with 2.5K organic traffic.
The site was only a partial match. That would be hard to justify for a link insertion. But this was a guest post, so LinkIntel could build a fresh article around our topic instead of squeezing our link into an old page.
They asked $100. LinkIntel offered $60 for one permanent dofollow link. They accepted.
Would you approve this deal or skip it?
LinkIntel found a DR 51 publisher with 2.5K organic traffic.
The site was only a partial match. That would be hard to justify for a link insertion. But this was a guest post, so LinkIntel could build a fresh article around our topic instead of squeezing our link into an old page.
They asked $100. LinkIntel offered $60 for one permanent dofollow link. They accepted.
Would you approve this deal or skip it?
@kalashvasaniya@scrolllaunch Useful for visibility and entity signals for sure. I’d just avoid treating all 100 as equal “high quality backlinks” because relevance matters way more than the DR label. Still, automating 70 hours of directory work is a win.
@semrush the second bullet is the hard one. when an AI describes your product wrong, the fix usually isn't on your site. it's on whatever third-party page it learned that from.
@levelsio the load alerts on your VPS are the index being built. and whoever's already written about on other people's pages is in it on day one, for free.
@aleyda 4 and 5 are doing a different job than the rest of that list. almost nobody links to your docs or your transaction pages. first-hand tests and original research are the only two other people write about.
@hridoyreh 12 links across 8 sites, so a few of those authors added you twice.
out of how many emails though? been automating this loop for a year and that ratio is still the only number that decides it.
@ericlancheres@bensenescu read through the repo before trying it. the data underneath is DataForSEO with your own key, so it's a very good interface over an API you pay for rather than an independent index. that's the right trade at low volume and the thing to model before you scale it
@buccocapital the first bullet is the one worth pushing on. agents don't measure relevance directly, they retrieve it from pages other people wrote. that still rewards whoever gets covered, reviewed and listed the most. a long tail catalog wins the matching, not automatically the citation