@DBees9 Easy day! Don't need to make trading harder than that, wait for the elevator down sell, long the failed breakdown, close platform. Too many people flipping back and forth and watching news etc
Sanctioning the Muslim Brotherhood, while simultaneously removing sanctions from the lead state sponsor of the Brotherhood, strikes of political schizophrenia
He co-owned Macy’s and could have kept every dollar. Instead, Nathan Straus gave two-thirds of his fortune to a country that didn't even exist yet.
An American New Yorker, Straus visited Jerusalem in 1904, canceled the rest of his Mediterranean tour, and dedicated his life to the Land of Israel.
He poured his wealth into:
Soup kitchens feeding hundreds daily in the Old City.
Health stations to fight malaria and trachoma.
A major Jerusalem health center with a cornerstone carved in English, Hebrew, and Arabic—built "for the benefit of all inhabitants."
In 1912, he was in Palestine with his brother Isidor. Nathan wanted to stay longer, but an impatient Isidor sailed home early on a ship called the Titanic. Isidor never made it back.
Devastated, Nathan spent the rest of his days giving, famously saying: “Give at death, it is lead. Give in sickness, it is silver. Give in health, it is gold.”
Today, a thriving coastal city of 250,000 people stands in Israel, built on the land he bet on decades before it was a state.
It’s called Netanya. Named for Natan.
Look at this clown @chucktodd "Overwhelming view of American Jews." Can you show us where you get this number? Also, nice of you to blame Bibi (A Jew) for antisemitism. What a scumabg you are.
BREAKING NEWS! Erdogan was prepared to join forces with Iran against our country and Israel?
The president has mentioned several times that he talked Erdogan out of entering the war on the side of the Iranian regime -- meaning, he talked Erdogan out of going to war with us and Israel? I really think that this needs to be explained in detail and fully pursued. If a NATO country was going to join the enemy in our war against Iran, we need to know all about it. The president is rightly condemning the lack of support from NATO countries, but in the case of Turkey, it was prepared to fight us? Can you imagine Erdogan using our military equipment against us? Now this thug will have our F-35s? And we're praising the hell out of this guy like he's our best friend? We need to know a lot more about this.
The IRGC is using AI to make it seem like more people are attending Khamenei’s funeral, when in reality, the streets are barely full of people.
Muslims are very good liars.
Erdogan has destroyed his main opposition party and jailed many of its leaders, as he has jailed and disappeared outspoken opponents for years. He threatens other NATO countries, works closely with Putin, who provides him with S-400 SAM advanced-mobile missile systems, occupies Cyprus, threatens Greece, threatens Israel, is allied with Iran and Qatar, backs the slaughter of Christians in Syria and Kurds anywhere, funded Hamas and gave safe harbor to several of its leaders, and supports Hezbollah. And his ambition to to re-establish something akin to the Ottoman Empire. AND WE ARE SELLING THIS THUG OUR ADVANCED F-35 JETS FIGHTERS AND JET ENGINES! There's no excuse for this.
1918, Emir Faisal I, calls the Arabs in Palestine to welcome, learn, and benefit from the Israelites returning to their land:
"We have seen the Israelites from foreign countries returning to Palestine from Russia, Germany, Austria, Spain, and America.
The cause of causes could not escape those who had a gift of deeper insight. They knew that the country was for its original sons, for all their differences, a sacred and beloved homeland.
The return of these exiles to their homeland will prove materially and spiritually an experimental school for their brethren who are with them in the fields, factories, trades and all things connected to the land."
Unfortunately, that call fell on fell on deaf ears, and instead many chose to follow Amin al-Husseini and embrace the Nazi ideology.
Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Faisal's words were accepted.
Palestinians aren’t a people.
They’re Arabs united by one thing: their obsession with destroying Israel.
Their suffering is self-inflicted, the direct result of repeatedly trying to commit genocide against the Jews and failing.
Western idiots waving their flag aren’t supporting a nation.
They’re supporting a culture of hate and failure.
73% of Republicans are more likely to vote for a Republican who supports a strong U.S.-Israel relationship—as opposed to just 16% who want a Republican opposed to Israel.
69% want a candidate who denounces antisemitism and says it has no place in the conservative movement—vs. just 17% who don’t.
68% support Israel over the Palestinians, with just 10% supporting the Palestinians over Israel.
67% say the U.S. and Israel’s geopolitical interests are usually aligned—compared to just 15% who said they aren’t.
@sharrond62 They’ll never forgive us for being right, because they’d have to admit they embraced an idiotic, unevidenced delusion that caused widespread harm to women and children.
Now that America is 250 years old, here are some hard truths:
-Trump did not do anything to the Muslim Brotherhood. They are not a fraternity. They don’t have chapters. Qatar and Turkeys are the two state sponsors and Trump sucks up to both. He’s selling America out to MB sponsors.
-Trump has not been able to pass Save ACT and yes that’s on senators but he has not been able to build enough political capital in his own party to get one thing passed. That’s crazy.
-Trump has done nothing to ban foreign ownership of agricultural land and single family homes in America. The first is driving up your food costs. The second is driving up cost of housing.
-Trump has done nothing to get foreign money out of universities or K-12 and instead has had his sec of Education meeting with Qataris and thanking them for money.
-Trump backed down on deportations. When do you hear about them recently?
You don’t want to talk Middle East and how he snatched defeat from the jaws of victory? Ok. Let’s talk about how he’s failed America on many of the most important things he needed to fix.
Voted for him 3 times. This is not winning. And the sycophants that just want your clicks get their coordinated orders the same way the terror simps get theirs.
Rubio is our last and best hope.
FWIW, DON'T DO IT
The sale of our top F-35 jets and jet engines to the terrorist-supporting, Putin ally, and Iranian aligned Erdogan is simply indefensible. He is actively threatening Israel and Greece (which is also a NATO member). The Islamist thug has destroyed Turkish society. He has been sanctioned by our Congress for acquiring S-400 advanced mobile SAMs from Putin. Is this sale in violation of the sanctions? I checked this morning. Erdogan has not returned the SAMs to Russia.
Hamas is not disarmed (Phase II of peace plan) and Iran is still kicking and receiving billions. Why arm up Turkey, which has greater ambitions in the region, and add fuel to the fire? Its NATO membership pre-dates Erdogan and is no excuse for selling him any of this advanced weaponry. His intention is to re-create something akin to the Ottoman Empire. Let's not do what even Biden wouldn't do.
Un 5 de julio de 1943, comenzaba la Batalla de Kursk, la mayor batalla de tanques de la historia, donde el Ejercito Rojo aplastó a 4 ejercitos nazis con sus generales mas prestigiosos al mando.
Desde el 5 de julio al 5 de septiembre, 500.000 nazis fueron liquidados por el Ejercito Rojo y mas de 3000 tanques de la Werhmacht fueron volados por los aires, el mayor daño en material militar que sufrieron en una sola batalla en toda la guerra.
En la batalla se desplegaron más de 4.000.000 soldados, 69.000 piezas de artillería, 13.000 blindados y 12.000 aviones en el campo de batalla, en lo que fue considerada en ese momento la confrontación militar más grande de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.
El golpe soviético a Hitler en Kursk fue tan duro y decisivo, que los nazis ya nunca más serían capaces de hacer una ofensiva contra el Ejercito Rojo en casi 2 años, siempre lucharían a la defensiva y nunca más volverían a organizar ofensivas a gran escala durante el resto de la guerra, la Wehrmacht perdió definitivamente la iniciativa estratégica, permitiendo al Ejército Rojo soviético avanzar ininterrumpidamente hacia Berlín.
Why in the world is the Trump administration empowering the Pakistan-Qatar-Turkey triangle?
These 3 nations aren’t U.S. allies.
Far from it.
Nor do they share our values & interests.
Far from it.
Nor are they partners for peace, democracy & coexistence.
Far from it.
WHY???
Americans are very generous, but they draw the line when someone has been granted the immense privilege of American citizenship, then throws that gift in our faces by insisting that America on its own is trash—and needs them to reshape us in the image of the place they left.
The Julius Streicher Method.
Part 1:
After the twentieth century made explicit antisemitism historically and morally indefensible, after the world saw exactly where that road leads, the ideology faced a choice: die or adapt. It adapted. It traded the megaphone for the microphone, the pamphlet for the podcast, the accusation for the question. In doing so, it became something more dangerous than before: plausibly deniable.
What follows is a description of exactly how the trick works. Not who is doing it. The trick itself. Because the trick is more important than any single person running it. People come and go. The trick stays.
The first move is the frame.
Before any specific claim is made, the audience is told that what they are about to hear has been hidden from them. " What they don’t want you to know." "How come we were never taught this in school?" "The things you can’t say on mainstream television."
These phrases do something precise: they position whatever follows as forbidden knowledge, and they preload the audience’s defenses against any counter-information they might later encounter.
Here is why that matters. If you accept that a powerful group is suppressing the truth, then any institutional denial of what you have heard is not evidence against it. It is evidence of the suppression.
The frame makes the theory unfalsifiable before the theory has even been stated. Every rebuttal confirms it. Every fact-check proves the point. The louder the denial, the deeper the conspiracy must run.
It is not a belief system. It is a trap. And it is built before the audience has heard a single specific claim.
The second move is the question.
Direct accusations can be challenged. Questions cannot, at least not in the same way. So the system operates almost entirely through questions.
" Why do you think so many people in these positions come from such similar backgrounds?" "Who do you think really benefits from this narrative?" "Why would they want to keep this story quiet?"
Every one of these questions imports an assumption as if it were already established fact. The question "Why would they lie about this?" presupposes a lie. The question "Who really controls the media?" presupposes control.
The audience accepts the presupposition in order to engage with the question at all, and by accepting it, absorbs it. Nothing was asserted. Everything was communicated.
Deployed consistently over months and years, this technique installs a complete conspiratorial worldview through inquiry alone. The audience arrives at the conclusions feeling as though they reasoned their way there. That feeling, that it was their own thinking and their own logic, is the most valuable thing the system produces. Beliefs you think you chose are almost impossible to dislodge.
The third move is the guest.
The host cannot say certain things directly without losing deniability. So the host invites someone else to say them: a guest with credentials, a book, a title, or a claim to serious historical research. The guest makes the argument. The host nods, extends it with follow-up questions, never challenges, and never pushes back. At the end, the host is merely a curious interviewer who provided a platform for diverse perspectives.
The specific use of this technique for historical revisionism is the tell. There is no legitimate scholarly debate about whether Adolf Hitler sought peace and was denied it, or whether his historical reputation is Allied propaganda. Those are not contested empirical questions. When a guest appears on a major platform to make exactly these arguments, and the host treats them with respectful curiosity rather than challenge, something specific is happening: the one historical fact that most viscerally discredits this ideology, that following it to its conclusion produced the Holocaust, is being softened. Made debatable. Made the kind of thing reasonable people might see differently.
This is absolute insanity. Pure, unfiltered brainwashing on full display.
Calla Walsh, the founder of Palestine Action US, flew out to attend the funeral of Ayatollah Khamenei.
That’s the same Khamenei who ran a regime that executed gays from cranes, beat and jailed women for showing their hair, and spent decades funding terrorist groups that murder innocents across the Middle East and beyond.
And what does this brainwashed radical say while she’s there? She calls him “the greatest anti-imperialist leader” of her lifetime.
A Western woman, raised in a free country, standing at the funeral of a theocratic tyrant and praising him like he’s some kind of hero.
This is what years of far left indoctrination, campus radicalism, and obsessive anti-Western hatred does to people.
They get so twisted up that they’ll side with the most oppressive, misogynistic, homophobic regimes on earth, as long as those regimes also hate America and Israel.
This isn’t activism. This is ideological sickness.
The far-left has completely merged with Islamist extremism, and they don’t even try to hide it anymore.
Disgusting. Dangerous. And exactly why normal people are done with this nonsense.
THE QURAN AS THE ULTIMATE 7TH-CENTURY REMIX: BORROWED JEWISH MIDRASH, APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS, PAGAN LEGENDS, AND EVOLVING VERSES THAT PROVE HUMAN COMPOSITION, NOT DIVINE REVELATION
The Quran presents itself as the perfect, uncreated word of Allah delivered directly to Muhammad. Yet its content reveals a patchwork of stories, styles, and ideas stitched together from Jewish, Christian, pagan, and pre-Islamic Arabian sources that Muhammad encountered in seventh-century Arabia. This is not timeless revelation from above. It is a human remix shaped by the political and religious environment of its time.
BORROWING FROM JEWISH TRADITION AND MIDRASH
The Quran retells Old Testament stories with clear additions from later Jewish legends. Abraham smashing his father’s idols and debating his people appears nowhere in Genesis. It comes straight from Jewish midrashic expansions used as sermon illustrations centuries after Abraham.
Solomon commanding the wind, speaking with animals, and ruling armies of jinn reflects post-biblical Jewish and folk tales, not the biblical record in 1 Kings. These are not corrections of earlier scripture. They are expansions of popular storytelling that Muhammad heard and repurposed as divine speech.
CHRISTIAN APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS AS THE SOURCE FOR JESUS' STORIES
The Quran’s accounts of Jesus’ childhood come directly from apocryphal writings written long after the apostles. Jesus speaking from the cradle to defend Mary and shaping clay birds that come to life appear in the Infancy Gospel of Thomas and the Arabic Infancy Gospel, both composed centuries after the canonical Gospels.
Mary’s early life under temple care and miraculous feeding echoes the Protoevangelium of James, another late apocryphal text. The New Testament gives almost no details of Jesus’ childhood beyond His birth and the temple visit at age twelve. The Quran fills those gaps with legendary material that never existed in the eyewitness record.
PAGAN, ZOROASTRIAN, AND PRE-ISLAMIC ARABIAN INFLUENCES
Stories of vanished nations like ‘Ad and Thamud destroyed by storms or swallowed by the earth mirror local Arabian folklore. The account of Dhul-Qarnayn building a barrier against Gog and Magog in Surah 18:83-98 draws heavily from the Syriac Alexander Romance, a legendary tale about Alexander the Great.
Descriptions of judgment, a bridge over hellfire, and scales of deeds carry Zoroastrian influences that had filtered into the region. Even the early Meccan surahs imitate the rhymed prose (saj’) and oath formulas of pre-Islamic soothsayers and poets like Imru’l-Qays. The style is not heavenly. It is recycled from the oral culture Muhammad knew.
EVOLUTION THROUGH ABROGATION AND POLITICAL NEED
The Quran did not drop from heaven as a finished book. It changed over twenty-three years as Muhammad’s power grew. Early Meccan verses emphasize monotheism and judgment. Later Medinan verses introduce detailed laws on war, booty, marriage, and fighting non-Muslims.
Surah 2:106 openly admits abrogation: Allah replaces a verse with one that is better or similar. Peaceful verses were overridden by militant ones as Muhammad became a military and political leader. This is not the mark of an eternal, unchanging revelation. It is the record of a man adapting his message to his rising circumstances.
HUMAN STANDARDIZATION AFTER MUHAMMAD
After Muhammad’s death in 632 C.E., competing versions circulated. Caliph Uthman ordered a single official text and had all other copies burned. One does not burn identical manuscripts. The act itself proves early textual diversity. The Quran we have today is the result of human selection and destruction of variants, not miraculous preservation.
THE BIBLICAL CONTRAST
The Bible was written across centuries by multiple authors in different cultures yet displays remarkable unity because it comes from Jehovah through the Holy Spirit. Its core message centers on the eyewitness testimony of the apostles who walked with Jesus and the prophetic record preserved in thousands of early manuscripts.
It does not borrow pagan myths or apocryphal legends and present them as divine truth. It fulfills its own prophecies in the person of Jesus Christ and maintains consistent moral teaching without the need for later abrogation or the burning of competing texts.
REAL-WORLD CONSEQUENCES
When a book built on borrowed stories, evolving commands, and human editing is treated as the flawless final revelation that supersedes the Bible, the result is a system of Sharia that demands submission, enforces inequality, and justifies jihad.
The claim of direct divine origin collapses under examination. The Quran bears every mark of a seventh-century Arabian composition assembled from the religious and cultural scraps available to Muhammad. It cannot be the perfect, eternal word that replaces the eyewitness record preserved in Scripture.
If it’s within your capacity and you value these educational posts, we appreciate any support on our ‘Buy Me a Coffee’ link found in our profile.