Abu Rayyan Abdulsalam

Salafi web designer

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs 2. He insults scholars like Shaykh Abdullaah Al-Bukhaari saying he was given a perceived position of kibaar, whereas for a very long time, his name was mentioned along side the names of Shaykh Rabee and Shaykh Ubayd. They both saw this and didn't disprove of it

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs @AbdullahJallow9 we were with Fawwaaz for knowledge purposes, they are with Fawwaaz for fitna purposes, we accepted Fawwāz when he was in line with scholars, they are with fawwaaz when he opposed scholars. Wallaahi this is misguidance, Allaahul musta'aan.

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs @AbdullahJallow9 Now, ask them, who are their scholars they refer back to? No one, they only use some individuals (like fawwaz) as smokescreen, whereas in the past they didn't have any regard for Fawwaaz nor Nizaar nor Bilaal Saalimi...

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs 3. He calls people "Arafatiyyah" then you @Abdullahjallow9 turn around and say what did Abu Iyaad do? It's either you are blind or don't understand proofs. I don't blame you, you never sat with real scholars (like you said), so how can you have their manners and knowledge?

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs Abu Iyaad did the following:

1. Brought up strange principles like "what happened to 'are you happy to return to the kitaab and sunnah'" when he was called to resolve issues involving the scholars, as if those scholars will use books of chemistry and physics to solve the issues.

[Abu Rayyan Abdulsalam @abaa_rayyan]

If your desires have blinded your heart not to understand, what was intended here is that there hasn't been any clear evidence that Shaykh 'Arafāt made tabdee of Abu Iyyad but hasn't Abu Iyyad opposed foundations from the foundations of Sunnah. What do we call that person

[أبو ريّان 🥀 @on1ycharmz]

You say you have not seen authentic evidence that ʿArafāt made tabdīʿ of Abū ʿIyāḍ, yet you then defend the tabdīʿ by saying whoever opposes the foundations of Ahl al-Sunnah is declared a mubtadiʿ, then you blame others for “blind-following”

[Moosaa Richardson أبو العباس موسى الطويل @1MMeducation]

Understand the causes & origins of clashing & division, so you can stop getting stung from the same hole over & over again!

Shaykh Rabee' ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee (may Allah have Mercy on him) said:

"...These affairs now, dear brothers, what is it that causes so many good people to start differing [about them]? It is speaking loosely about matters one is not proficient in. These current events and crises are to be returned to an exclusive category of scholars, may Allah bless you, not to just anyone.

I consider that they (i.e., those differing) are -of course- all upon a single methodology, yet they differ and even warn against each other. What is at the core of this warning (against one another)? From the causes of this warning is engaging in loose talk. When people engage in loose talk, it leads to splitting. Once splitting occurs, corrupt opinions form, which may lead to such warnings.

So I consider that one of the causes of this splitting, differing, name-calling, and other things is that everybody is talking loosely about these serious topics which they are not qualified to deal with. Had they only returned the matter back to its people, the likes of this differing would not be found, nor these warnings or this splitting. So learn [your lesson], dear brothers! The prosperous one is he who learns a lesson from others. The believer is not stung from the same hole twice! So do not be stung multiple times! When a critical event takes place, do not rush to speak loosely about it, because that leads to splitting, and then further on to division into groups, and then to trials and problems which have no beginning or end!..."

Read more: https://t.co/hZ5aZp3nny

[أبو حفص الفارسي @ibnakhira]

@ArrisaalahPubs The only thing that gets this Abdullah Jallow agitated is when Abu Iyaad is refuted for his ignorance and misguidance. Never agitated by the fact that Abu Iyaad insults and debases the scholars of sunnah whom he once acknowledged as his masha’ikh.

[Abu Rayyan Abdulsalam @abaa_rayyan]

@ArrisaalahPubs More evidences from Abu Iyyad's website labeling Shaykh 'Arafāt An Haddādi and also a plant without evidences

[Kamaldeen Bn Jumu'ah @abuu_haleemah]

@ArrisaalahPubs People have called us Wahhaabiyyah, Madkhaliyyah, Jaamiyyah, and now it is Arafatiyyah.

Abū Iyād called us Arafatiyyah.

[Abu Affān Al-Marzuuq NGR @UthMarzuq]

@abaa_rayyan @ArrisaalahPubs Yet, they come around surprised that scholars refered to Abu Iyaad as a plant. Many are those planted by Shaytan to continue his work of separating the Salafis!

[Moosaa Richardson أبو العباس موسى الطويل @1MMeducation]

The recent consorted efforts to discredit the virtuous scholar, Shaykh 'Arafaat ibn Hasan al-Muhammadi (may Allah preserve him) -as people of insight can see clearly- is coming from a group of discredited & erroneous individuals, who, instead of rectifying their affairs & returning back to the scholars about their own serious blunders, are temporarily* huddling together in order to create a muddy, confusing atmosphere of back & forth criticism, a smokescreen, to conceal their own errors & realities from being known.

Understanding this point explains much of the weird & abrupt "regrouping" we are witnessing, and the sudden dropping of this scholar with the haphazard introduction of another in his place.

*The temporary nature of this sloppy regrouping is known by the evident expiry of the individuals in the regrouping, after only a few weeks or months. We see a scholar promoted as one of real insight this month; next month he is dropped and replaced with a new name (once he is made aware of the serious errors of those promoting him).

ستكتب شهادتهم ويسألون
"Their testimony shall be written down and they shall be questioned [about it]." (az-Zukhruf: 19)

Consider carefully who such people are, the serious errors they commit, the harm they continue to cause, and how the scholars (like Shaykh 'Arafaat - may Allah reward & preserve him) have clarified their harms and warned against them, and then ask yourself: How foolish would I be to fall for this propaganda?

[Abu Rayyan Abdulsalam @abaa_rayyan]

@ArrisaalahPubs This is Abu Iyyad's Shaykh publicly declaring the salafis to be sūfiyyatul Bukhari, Declaring the salafis to be hizbis, A misguided fellow, who misguides.

[Adeyemi Ahmad A.A @Maverick_Adey]

@ArrisaalahPubs The double standards is pathetic!

Jallow and his scholars have named people "suffiyatu Bukhari", called a scholar an Hadaadi, called Shaykh Arafat a "plant" - all baseless accusations but when Abu Iyyad is called a plant, and rightly so, you start convulsing.
How pathetic!

[Ibrahim • Web and Product Designer @uxacon]

@ArrisaalahPubs The stance is of Abu iyaad is in opposite to the foundation of sunnah. Allah subhanahu wata'āla says: فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ

Abu iyaad and his blind followers throw this ayah and other evidence in the Quran and sunnah on their back.

[Abu Affān Al-Marzuuq NGR @UthMarzuq]

@ArrisaalahPubs Shaykh Musa Richardson had really been patient on his vituperstions that he has been directing towards him. Jallow mistakes his brazen way to be boldness.

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

There is this Manchester-based 50 year old adult yet a "boy", Abdullah Jallow who seems to have no knowledge or skill except to insult and to proudly announce his age at any chance. Oh, and to announce his 25/30 years of following his masters around, with no observable traces of knowledge nor any respect for the people of knowledge except his masters.

​I have realized that this individual mistakes the way noble people ignore his unruly behavior and sharp tongue as him presenting "evidence" and "harsh truths." But no! It is merely prattling, babbling, and a display of his lack of religious knowledge and basic common sense.

​Regarding your question: "Where is the evidence for the Tabdee' against Abu 'Iyād?"

​Firstly, I haven't seen any authentic chain of transmission clearly stating that Sh. 'Arafāt declared him to be an innovator.

​Secondly, even if it is established that he was truly declared an innovator, why is it such a big deal? When a person opposes the foundational beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah, he is declared a mubtadi'.

​Or are you unaware that Abu 'Iyād claimed that disputes between duaat should not be referred back to the scholars? Even after people of knowledge corrected him, he remained stubbornly devoted to this false principle and continued to defend it!

​Moreover, if we are talking about false tabdī', is there anyone more guilty of it than you and your ilk? Nizār branded everyone who does not support his transgressions as "Hizb Jadeed" and has repeated this several times. Do you care to ask him for his evidence for that?

​He branded Sh. Salāh Kantūsh a Hizbī and Shaykh Ahmad Bādukhūn a Haddādi. Where is his evidence for this tabdī'?

​Fawwāz al-Madkhali branded everyone who does not follow them as "Sūfiyyatul Bukhāri." What was his evidence for that?

​The uncaptured thief is now trying to arrest the farmer. You and your ilk are the ones who have branded Salafis with false tabdī' countless times, yet you still shed crocodile tears to present yourselves as the victims. Mr. Jallow, fear Allah.

​The description of him being a "plant" is highly fitting for anyone who divides the Muslims and tries to turn them away from their scholars, just as Abu 'Iyād is doing. A person who divides the Salafis because his ego prevents him from retracting an error he was refuted for is surely a plant of Shaytān!

​Lastly, 'Ali Al-Hudhayfi and Abu 'Iyād have been falsely branding Sh. 'Arafāt a "plant" for a while now- why didn't we see all this crying from you then?

​If you continue to disrespect those who are teaching and defending the Deen of Allah, the people of Sunnah will not stand by and let you cause mischief on the earth.

​Mubārak Ismail

[Abū Muslim @AbuMuslim2003]

@ArrisaalahPubs Allahu l musta'ān
This Abū 'Iyad has also been the one insulting SHAYKH ABDULLAH AL-BUKHĀRĪ since.
Turning the salafis away from their scholars.

Bringing innovated principles into Salafiyyah without evidence.

Allahu l musta'ān

Then what is he then if not PLANT.

[Lukman Abdulrauf @dashboard_exp]

@ArrisaalahPubs I don't know what you call someone that severe people from the scholars, hurl insults at them and disagree to return affairs to them other than a "plant"

[Abu Sa'd Mudathir @MaktabatulF]

@ArrisaalahPubs Wallahul Musta'an
نسأل الله سلامة العقل
It's upon this old boy be careful with his hand that he's using to write insults.
And all those who surround him should call him to order from his "elders"
بَني هِلالٍ أَلا فانهَوا سَفيهَكُمُ
إِنَّ السَفيهَ إِذا لَم يُنهَ مأَمورُ