chairman, director of football and manager of Abadeyah fc @sorare |husband, father and Chilizen @chiliz I’m not a troll for pointing out your hypocrisy
Help from @josh_hammer who @ComicDaveSmith humiliated twice, one time in front of Charlie? Do you think we are morons? You expect us to believe Charlie wanted his help, even though Charlie set Josh up against Dave to fail.
This is another great example of how Candace either doesn't know, or doesn't care, how Charlie actually lived his life.
She ridicules the idea that Charlie would talk to people like @josh_hammer or rabbis about how to frame arguments on Israel before debates, because he was "smarter" than them. Instead, they must have been threatening him, she says.
Well, I was a part of that prep work, and they weren't threatening him. Instead, it really was just debate prep. Charlie always knew he could be better and was eager to get advice and guidance from other people he thought could help him. He was so successful not because he was innately smarter than everyone, but rather because he had so much humility.
I can see how Candace might be unable to relate to a person like that.
I have spoken to a senior @CAF_Online official concerning Arkan’s case. The person declines to be named.
“We are in conversation with @FIFAcom over this matter.”
I asked the official whether CAF will issue a statement of support for Arkan. “We are engaging in quiet diplomacy. Shouting in public could make things a lot worse,” the person said.
“This is a FIFA matter, not a CAF affair. We have no blame in this matter.”
Will the “quiet diplomacy” result in Arkan’s return to the tournament? The CAF official could not answer my question.
#Africa, there you have it…
Why not extrapolate to gender? As man should you take responsibility for rape, as men rape more than women? And what does taking responsibility mean? @kevinnbass
Certain ethnic minorities are imprisoned more often not because there is a bias against them, but because they commit more crime
These groups should take more responsibility for the criminal behavior of their members and stop blaming "bias"; there is bias in FAVOR of them; they simply commit more crimes
@Fx1Jonny@Bushra1Shaikh Would it have been the wrong decision if she ended up keeping the baby and you guys split up for different reasons? What a strange way up putting it? Killing an unborn was the right decision because the parents ended up seperating in the future.
We don't care about your religion.
I could say my religion requires that every time I get a hard on, I reveal it to the nearest woman.
But it doesn't matter. We have rules that say you can't do that.
Your religion says you have this dagger. We say you don't.
Your religion says we can't draw a picture of Muhammad. We say we can. Goodbye.
Here's how the game they're playing with Erika works. They start with an outrageous claim or accusation that's so serious and damaging, it feels like you have no choice but to respond to it. Then they flip the burden of proof. Instead of proving the claim, they demand proof it isn't true. This is burden-shifting, but it's made worse by the fact that a lot of accusations are difficult (if not impossible) to disprove, especially when they’re about someone's motives or private behavior.
Once the accusation is out there, every possible reaction gets twisted into evidence of guilt. If you deny it, they say you’re being defensive. If you try to explain yourself, they say you’re over-explaining because you got caught. If you get angry, they say your anger proves they struck a nerve. And if you stay quiet, well . . . only the guilty have nothing to say in their own defense.
So the outrageous accusation itself never actually gets tested honestly, and it wasn't supposed to. The whole point was to make as many people as possible believe the claim must be true, no matter what is or isn't said in response to it. And it's nearly as effective as it is evil.
The only way out of the trap is to show that it's a trap, and to ridicule and reject the wicked people who tried to set it up in the first place.
Israel doesn't train dogs to rape Palestinian inmates. That's a vicious, stupid lie pushed by a slimy little propagandist. But this newest blood libel is meant to distract you from the latest released evidence- including video recordings that *no credible person says are fake* of Palestinians doing the most sadistic, grotesque things imaginable on Oct 7- raping corpses while they are mutilating and murdering them, lighting genitals on fire, shooting out the eyes and genitals of helpless victims, forcing husbands to watch as their wives and children are raped and murdered-
And Palestinians did this on the *orders of their elected government* with months of planning to do exactly what they did. It wasn't spontaneous. The monstrous cruelty, the sexual degradation was the point. They knew Oct 7 wasn't going to win a war, or gain any territory. It was just an orgy of Jew hate and violence. The Palestinians were mass murdering, child rapist terrorists who did all this and were gleeful about it. They made phone calls boasting to their family members.
Did anyone in the Hamas government express remorse or regret about any of this? Or anywhere in Gaza? Of course not. They ordered it. They delighted in the extreme pain and cruelty of the Oct 7 operation against Jews.
So now some Americans, including ones who claim to be conservative, are taking the side of Hamas and claiming this was a genocide?
What do these people really think Israel was supposed to do in response to Oct 7?
Fight an imaginary "gentle" war?
No response at all?
Give up?
Childish thinking. Absurd moral preening. War is hell, but Hamas brought that hell upon Gaza.
It's bad enough when it comes from random people. It's infinitely worse when it comes from so-called friends. Charlie never would've allowed his friends to torment his wife — and they wouldn't have dared if he were still here. These demons waited until she was defenseless to reveal themselves.