Abdul

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rparthiepan Tang town

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rndmsarkar @sgurumurthy The hadith teaches caution with contagious illness, which aligns with basic human safety—even modern medicine follows the same principle.

And the Prophet is not believed to perform miracles at will. They occur by God’s permission, not personal choice. its your misunderstanding

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rndmsarkar @sgurumurthy Who said he was not an ordinary human being? Show me the sahih hadith stating he is not an ordinary human being.

No one denied the hadith is Sahih. The issue is your interpretation.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rndmsarkar @sgurumurthy Even today, we isolate contagious diseases for safety—this is not cruelty, it’s responsibility. So presenting this as hypocrisy or lack of compassion is a misreading.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rndmsarkar @sgurumurthy Second, the hadith you quoted about “running away from a leper” is about taking precautions against disease, not abandoning people. Islam also teaches “no contagion except by Allah’s permission,” which balances faith with practical caution.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@rndmsarkar @sgurumurthy There are multiple inaccuracies in what you’ve written.

First, the story about the Prophet marrying a woman named “Amra binti Yazid” and divorcing her due to leprosy is not an established or authentic report in the primary sources.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@san_nature @sgurumurthy “Kafir” is an Arabic word that literally means “one who rejects or covers the truth,” not a blanket insult for all non-Muslims. Even in the Quran, it’s used in different contexts, not as a general label for everyone outside Islam.

So yes, context matters here as well.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@AbhiramYogi @sgurumurthy No, the verses exist. What’s wrong is how they’re being presented.

Quoting verses without context and attaching meanings that aren’t actually in the text is misleading. That’s the issue I pointed out.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@shantanu_ccu @sgurumurthy Regulating a situation is not the same as endorsing it.

Also, Islamic law is not based on a single verse. Conditions like maturity, consent, and welfare are part of the broader framework. So jumping from a waiting-period verse to “abuse” is a conclusion you’re adding.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@shantanu_ccu @sgurumurthy You’re applying today’s legal definitions to a 7th-century text without considering how legal systems work.

65:4 is not introducing or encouraging marriage with minors—it is addressing existing situations and giving rules for divorce.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@san_nature @sgurumurthy It’s not a theory, it’s basic reading. Context decides meaning.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@AbhiramYogi @sgurumurthy It’s not okay, and the text doesn’t permit it. You’re misrepresenting it.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@shantanu_ccu @sgurumurthy 65:4 is about divorce waiting periods, not permission for abuse. You’re adding a conclusion that isn’t in the text.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@eziind2 @sgurumurthy Killing and rape are wrong, I agree. But you’re assuming the text is promoting them, which is not accurate. The verses you’re referring to are about specific wartime situations, not general permission for violence, and rape is not permitted at all. Context matters.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@BBBBachao @sgurumurthy Personal comment chhod do. List se koi ek verse uthao aur uska proper context dikhao, phir baat karte hain.

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@sansbarrier @Panaiyuraan So while going out are you taking any mobile toilet also?

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@sansbarrier @Panaiyuraan I am asking likewise as you doesnt want to share your plate then how in your good shame are you eating in other plates while you go out and while you go to any restaurant?

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@sansbarrier @Panaiyuraan So are you having any mobile while you go out?

[Abdul @abdulmohamed6]

@sansbarrier So are you bringing your own plate to restaurants and on your travel also?