Lawrence aboh

@abohlarry

#Lawyer, #Rotaractor, #Painter.

Lagos, Nigeria

Joined March 2016

724 Following

246 Followers

787 Posts

abohlarry retweeted

Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF

@ChidiOdinkalu

about 1 month ago

The judgment of @SupremeCourtNg in this @nestoilltd & @NecondeEnrgyLtd case is a rare & staggering record of corrupt #JudicialMalpractice at senior appellate level. The only surprise is how or why the court stops short of referring for appropriate disciplinary sanctions the conduct of both the @CourtAppealNg Justices & of the #SANs with whom they were manifestly complicit.

ChidiOdinkalu's tweet photo. The judgment of @SupremeCourtNg in this @nestoilltd & @NecondeEnrgyLtd case is a rare & staggering record of corrupt #JudicialMalpractice at senior appellate level.

The only surprise is how or why the court stops short of referring for appropriate disciplinary sanctions the conduct of both the @CourtAppealNg Justices & of the #SANs with whom they were manifestly complicit.

160

118

10K

abohlarry retweeted

AYEESHA 🤏🏽🤏🏽🤏🏽 @AyeehsaLiq

5 months ago

Bookmark this and watch till the end when you are free. THE NIGERIAN BILLIONAIRES…..

346

17K

22K

390K

abohlarry retweeted

A. O Akinyemi Esq - LLB, BL @heisrahman

5 months ago

Falana v. Meta: When Jurisprudence Cooks Concoction Rice The first time I heard the phrase concoction rice was as a taunt — the meal of a child who had not yet acquired the refined skill required to produce a proper pot of jollof. In my defence, I was trying. I would enter the kitchen with confidence, pour rice, pepper, seasoning, salt and every other ingredient I could lay my hands on (sometimes all at once). The food would come out, yes, but it would not come out right and it was definitely not healthy. Reading Falana v. Meta took me back to that kitchen because what I saw looked and more importantly, tasted like jurisprudential concoction rice: a mixture of different legal principles, combined in a way that suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how those principles work together, producing a precedent that is difficult for the legal palate to digest. The Case in Brief: The Applicant alleged that a page known as “Africare Health Centre” published a video using his name, image and a purported voice, falsely stating that he suffered from prostatitis, and that this amounted to (y) a breach of his constitutional right to privacy, and (z) a violation of the NDPA. He sought declaratory reliefs, an order for takedown, and $5,000,000 in damages. The Court granted the declarations, refused the takedown (because the video had already been removed), and awarded $25,000,000 in damages. And that is where the real questions begin because every page of that 18-page judgment made me ask: Why? How? On what doctrinal pathway? Who actually made the publication? It was not in dispute that the content was posted by a third party on a page. The Respondent said so. The Applicant did not controvert it. The Court itself acknowledged it. Yet, liability moved, not to the publisher but to the platform. Even more interesting, the Court restated the settled principle that liability for a publication lies with the maker of the statement and still proceeded in the opposite direction. That is the first spoon of the concoction. The Agency Leap: The Court held that the platform could be treated as a disclosed principal, and the unknown user as an undisclosed agent, thereby grounding vicarious liability. Yes! Agency in a data protection / fundamental rights action. Pause and think about the implications. If providing a platform automatically creates a principal–agent relationship, then: media houses are principals of every guest, event organisers are principals of every speaker, telecom providers are principals of every caller. That is not an incremental development of law. That is a doctrinal earthquake. The Impossibility Standard: The judgment says platforms owe a duty to ensure integrity of publications, fair, but how is that achieved globally? This is achieved through notice-and-takedown mechanisms; reporting systems and remedial frameworks. We have seen it in the EU by the provisions of the Digital Services Act. It is not by requiring pre-publication verification of every user post. From the record, the platform had a notice mechanism, and removed the content once notified. Yet that responsible conduct received no real doctrinal weight and the court moved straight to liability and an imposition of an impossibility. Joint Data Controller — Without the “why”: Then came the final ingredient: Meta as a joint data controller. The Court held that in the circumstance, Meta was a joint data controller without a clear analytical pathway. No structured controller-determination test. No engagement with “means and purposes” in the NDPA sense. The Court just made a declaration. Honestly, this is not how such a far-reaching concept should enter our jurisprudence. Damages and the Father Christmas Problem: The Applicant asked for $5M special damages and the Court awarded $25M. The Court is not Father Christmas. Even in general damages, the award must remain tied to the claim before the court, and established principles. Unfortunately,...

heisrahman's tweet photo. Falana v. Meta: When Jurisprudence Cooks Concoction Rice

The first time I heard the phrase concoction rice was as a taunt — the meal of a child who had not yet acquired the refined skill required to produce a proper pot of jollof.

In my defence, I was trying. I would enter the kitchen with confidence, pour rice, pepper, seasoning, salt and every other ingredient I could lay my hands on (sometimes all at once). The food would come out, yes, but it would not come out right and it was definitely not healthy.

Reading Falana v. Meta took me back to that kitchen because what I saw looked and more importantly, tasted like jurisprudential concoction rice: a mixture of different legal principles, combined in a way that suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of how those principles work together, producing a precedent that is difficult for the legal palate to digest.

The Case in Brief:

The Applicant alleged that a page known as “Africare Health Centre” published a video using his name, image and a purported voice, falsely stating that he suffered from prostatitis, and that this amounted to (y) a breach of his constitutional right to privacy, and (z) a violation of the NDPA.

He sought declaratory reliefs, an order for takedown, and $5,000,000 in damages.

The Court granted the declarations, refused the takedown (because the video had already been removed), and awarded $25,000,000 in damages.

And that is where the real questions begin because every page of that 18-page judgment made me ask: Why? How? On what doctrinal pathway?

Who actually made the publication?

It was not in dispute that the content was posted by a third party on a page. The Respondent said so. The Applicant did not controvert it. The Court itself acknowledged it. Yet, liability moved, not to the publisher but to the platform.

Even more interesting, the Court restated the settled principle that liability for a publication lies with the maker of the statement and still proceeded in the opposite direction. That is the first spoon of the concoction.

The Agency Leap:

The Court held that the platform could be treated as a disclosed principal, and the unknown user as an undisclosed agent, thereby grounding vicarious liability.

Yes! Agency in a data protection / fundamental rights action. Pause and think about the implications.

If providing a platform automatically creates a principal–agent relationship, then: media houses are principals of every guest, event organisers are principals of every speaker, telecom providers are principals of every caller.

That is not an incremental development of law. That is a doctrinal earthquake.

The Impossibility Standard:

The judgment says platforms owe a duty to ensure integrity of publications, fair, but how is that achieved globally?

This is achieved through notice-and-takedown mechanisms; reporting systems and remedial frameworks. We have seen it in the EU by the provisions of the Digital Services Act. It is not by requiring pre-publication verification of every user post.

From the record, the platform had a notice mechanism, and removed the content once notified. Yet that responsible conduct received no real doctrinal weight and the court moved straight to liability and an imposition of an impossibility.

Joint Data Controller — Without the “why”:

Then came the final ingredient: Meta as a joint data controller. The Court held that in the circumstance, Meta was a joint data controller without a clear analytical pathway. No structured controller-determination test. No engagement with “means and purposes” in the NDPA sense.

The Court just made a declaration. Honestly, this is not how such a far-reaching concept should enter our jurisprudence.

Damages and the Father Christmas Problem:

The Applicant asked for $5M special damages and the Court awarded $25M.

The Court is not Father Christmas. Even in general damages, the award must remain tied to the claim before the court, and established principles.

Unfortunately,...

112

163

20K

abohlarry retweeted

NaijaAttorney

@TundeAdejumo9

7 months ago

A Lawyer's Guide: How to Make Your Adumbration Memorable and Effective.

331

100

557

24K

Who to follow

Feng Pwajok🕊️🤍

@FengPwajok1

I'm a lawyer: a solicitor, an advocate, an arbitrator that wants to help make the world just and a better place for everyone.

🇳🇬Lawyer| Rights Activist| Sagittarius|Great Josite| Chelsea FC ⚽ Supporter ⚖️

Lawrence aboh @abohlarry

7 months ago

@General_Somto The security guys might not know how to open the Rolls Royce bonnet. Pardon them

abohlarry retweeted

OBA OF P.H 👑

@obaofph01

7 months ago

Physiological Truths About Men Who Treat Their Birthdays Like a Normal Day 1. They’re used to doing life alone. From childhood, nobody really made a big deal out of their special moments — so they learned not to expect anything. 2. They’re naturally low-maintenance. Gifts, parties, noise — it’s never been their thing. Peace is their real celebration. 3. They pour into others more than they receive. They’re the “strong one,” the one everyone calls… but when it’s their turn, they don’t want to feel like a burden. 4. They’ve learned to make themselves happy. A quiet meal, a prayer, a moment alone — it’s enough. They’re used to creating their own joy. 5. They measure life in progress, not dates. To them, a new year is not about cake 🎂 it’s about whether they’ve grown, improved, or achieved.

obaofph01's tweet photo. Physiological Truths About Men Who Treat Their Birthdays Like a Normal Day
1. They’re used to doing life alone.
From childhood, nobody really made a big deal out of their special moments — so they learned not to expect anything.

2. They’re naturally low-maintenance.
Gifts, parties, noise — it’s never been their thing. Peace is their real celebration.

3. They pour into others more than they receive.
They’re the “strong one,” the one everyone calls… but when it’s their turn, they don’t want to feel like a burden.

4. They’ve learned to make themselves happy.
A quiet meal, a prayer, a moment alone — it’s enough. They’re used to creating their own joy.

5. They measure life in progress, not dates. To them, a new year is not about cake 🎂 it’s about whether they’ve grown, improved, or achieved.

24K

Lawrence aboh @abohlarry

7 months ago

@obaofph01 This describes all about me actually. My birthday is in a few days. I have been getting what you want for your birthday, how do you want to celebrate it and all. But deep down, i just need peace and wish nobody disturbed themselves financially. Thank you for this.

abohlarry retweeted

Mimi

@Mimi_yakigar

7 months ago

This nomination came with applause but also with serious questions. I took time to think beyond the noise, beyond the excitement, and beyond public pressure. In this video, I share my full reasoning and my final decision. As always, a truth at a time. #Atruthatatime #Nigeriannews #taxreform

337

655

83K

abohlarry retweeted

A. O Akinyemi Esq - LLB, BL @heisrahman

8 months ago

If Buying a Car, House, Equipment or Any Big-Ticket Product Is in Your 2026 Plans, Read This First. A 15-Year Commercial Lesson from a $1 Million Deal Gone Wrong - (Major Concept Ltd. v. Eze (2025) 19 NWLR (Pt. 2019) 1 The facts of this case read like something that happens every day in Nigeria. Someone pays for a product, the seller gives endless excuses, and the buyer spends years chasing a refund. In November 2010, a buyer (the respondent) entered into a contract with the sellers (the appellants) for the supply of a Maybach 62 S armoured Mercedes-Benz. The agreed price was $830,000. An initial $700,000 deposit was to be paid, and the balance of $130,000 would be paid on delivery. The buyer paid the $700,000 into the sellers’ nominated Bank of America account and the delivery was supposed to happen within four months. Instead of a car, the sellers began to offer excuses, changing timelines, adjusting the balance, and adding new conditions. Eventually, they asked for an additional $300,000 before delivery. The buyer paid it, bringing the total to $1,000,000. Still, no vehicle. Despite personal guarantees and repeated assurances, nothing happened. When the buyer got frustrated, the buyer sued for a refund of the $1 million, claiming total failure of consideration. Because the case was brought under the Summary Judgment Procedure, the sellers were required to file an affidavit showing they had a real defence. They couldn’t show they had a real defence. The High Court entered judgment for the buyer. The Court of Appeal affirmed it. The sellers dragged the matter to the Supreme Court, and again, they lost. From 2010 until its conclusion, this matter illustrates something every Nigerian, individual or business, needs to understand: Once your money leaves your hand, the journey to get value or a refund becomes a battle. Without clear documentation and strategic shields, that battle becomes a war and in war, the unprepared are the first to fall. Commercial Lessons for Anyone Planning a Major Purchase in 2025/2026 1. Never pay large sums without proper legal shields & documentation. This is not being paranoid. It is a protection you should put in place before you transfer money for a car, equipment, property, imported goods, or any expensive item. Before you commit to any significant purchase, get a lawyer to review the contract; and if no contract exists at all, that is your first and clearest red flag. Engage a lawyer who represents your interests to prepare a proper agreement for execution. The contract should classify your payment as a liquidated sum, set out recovery terms that are clear and enforceable, and be structured in a way that favours swift remedies, including the possibility of summary judgment, if things ever go wrong. Trust me, things do go wrong every time. Many Nigerians spend years chasing refunds simply because no contract existed at the outset and when one does exist, it is often silent on the things that matter or, worse, carelessly drafted. In an age where many trust AI to play the role of a lawyer, they forget that the context, nuance, and peculiarities of each transaction shape the structure and the safeguards that must follow. Do not be penny wise and pound foolish; the money you save today may become the loss you mourn tomorrow. 2. Avoid “gentleman agreements” and WhatsApp contracts. A $1 million lesson: When things go wrong, screenshots might not save you in a manner you would love. Contracts need liquidated damages clauses (not penalty clauses), jurisdiction/venue clauses used strategically, timelines with consequences, refund triggers, obligations clearly tied to delivery milestones. These make recovery faster and cleaner. 3. Explore tripartite structures when appropriate. Not every contract must be 1 buyer + 1 seller. Sometimes, adding a third party can create stronger accountability such as a guarantor, a financier or an escrow agent. Many people argue...

heisrahman's tweet photo. If Buying a Car, House, Equipment or Any Big-Ticket Product Is in Your 2026 Plans, Read This First.

A 15-Year Commercial Lesson from a $1 Million Deal Gone Wrong - (Major Concept Ltd. v. Eze (2025) 19 NWLR (Pt. 2019) 1

The facts of this case read like something that happens every day in Nigeria. Someone pays for a product, the seller gives endless excuses, and the buyer spends years chasing a refund.

In November 2010, a buyer (the respondent) entered into a contract with the sellers (the appellants) for the supply of a Maybach 62 S armoured Mercedes-Benz. The agreed price was $830,000. An initial $700,000 deposit was to be paid, and the balance of $130,000 would be paid on delivery.

The buyer paid the $700,000 into the sellers’ nominated Bank of America account and the delivery was supposed to happen within four months.

Instead of a car, the sellers began to offer excuses, changing timelines, adjusting the balance, and adding new conditions. Eventually, they asked for an additional $300,000 before delivery. The buyer paid it, bringing the total to $1,000,000.

Still, no vehicle. Despite personal guarantees and repeated assurances, nothing happened. When the buyer got frustrated, the buyer sued for a refund of the $1 million, claiming total failure of consideration.

Because the case was brought under the Summary Judgment Procedure, the sellers were required to file an affidavit showing they had a real defence. They couldn’t show they had a real defence. The High Court entered judgment for the buyer. The Court of Appeal affirmed it. The sellers dragged the matter to the Supreme Court, and again, they lost.

From 2010 until its conclusion, this matter illustrates something every Nigerian, individual or business, needs to understand:

Once your money leaves your hand, the journey to get value or a refund becomes a battle. Without clear documentation and strategic shields, that battle becomes a war and in war, the unprepared are the first to fall.

Commercial Lessons for Anyone Planning a Major Purchase in 2025/2026

1. Never pay large sums without proper legal shields & documentation.

This is not being paranoid. It is a protection you should put in place before you transfer money for a car, equipment, property, imported goods, or any expensive item.

Before you commit to any significant purchase, get a lawyer to review the contract; and if no contract exists at all, that is your first and clearest red flag. Engage a lawyer who represents your interests to prepare a proper agreement for execution. The contract should classify your payment as a liquidated sum, set out recovery terms that are clear and enforceable, and be structured in a way that favours swift remedies, including the possibility of summary judgment, if things ever go wrong. Trust me, things do go wrong every time.

Many Nigerians spend years chasing refunds simply because no contract existed at the outset and when one does exist, it is often silent on the things that matter or, worse, carelessly drafted. In an age where many trust AI to play the role of a lawyer, they forget that the context, nuance, and peculiarities of each transaction shape the structure and the safeguards that must follow. Do not be penny wise and pound foolish; the money you save today may become the loss you mourn tomorrow.

2. Avoid “gentleman agreements” and WhatsApp contracts.

A $1 million lesson: When things go wrong, screenshots might not save you in a manner you would love.

Contracts need liquidated damages clauses (not penalty clauses), jurisdiction/venue clauses used strategically, timelines with consequences, refund triggers, obligations clearly tied to delivery milestones. These make recovery faster and cleaner.

3. Explore tripartite structures when appropriate.

Not every contract must be 1 buyer + 1 seller. Sometimes, adding a third party can create stronger accountability such as a guarantor, a financier or an escrow agent.

Many people argue...

105

23K

abohlarry retweeted

Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF

@ChidiOdinkalu

10 months ago

"That #Nigerian politicians are corrupt is no news to anyone. What is remarkable is how their corruption is facilitated, even legitimized, by senior members of @NigBarAssoc in foreign courts...." https://t.co/1kqn9OZs4e

ChidiOdinkalu's tweet photo. "That #Nigerian politicians are corrupt is no news to anyone. What is remarkable is how their corruption is facilitated, even legitimized, by senior members of @NigBarAssoc in foreign courts...."
https://t.co/1kqn9OZs4e https://t.co/ZlCchH0f34

393

286

15K

abohlarry retweeted

WALE ADEAGBO LEGAL @Lit_WALEGAL

10 months ago

LITIGASHIP MONTHLY DIGEST volume 8.2 of 2025 https://t.co/HLz5bX5Fp0 DR. JEREMIAH ABALAKA v. THE MINISTER OF HEALTH & ORS A claim for enforcement of fundamental rights under Chapter IV of the Constitution must be the main and predicate claims, and not the ancillary to it.

abohlarry retweeted

General’s Mommy❤️

@olusola__

11 months ago

https://t.co/D8h1QmJiqu

25K

abohlarry retweeted

Ugochukwu Ugwoke, ISch

@FrUgochukwu

11 months ago

Dearest Mother, you who loved and cared for the Holy Family in Nazareth, look with tenderness upon our family. Heal our wounds, deepen our love, and help us forgive one another. May our home be filled with faith, peace, and joy, with Jesus always at the center.

FrUgochukwu's tweet photo. Dearest Mother, you who loved and cared for the Holy Family in Nazareth, look with tenderness upon our family. Heal our wounds, deepen our love, and help us forgive one another. May our home be filled with faith, peace, and joy, with Jesus always at the center. https://t.co/X3lg5ZZwzL

153

185

10K

abohlarry retweeted

OurFaveOnlineDoc 🇬🇧 🇳🇬

@OurFavOnlineDoc

12 months ago

Anytime I see this man’s videos I always learn something new.

207

15K

370K

abohlarry retweeted

Onuh Ladi PhD

@omaonuhs

about 1 year ago

15 years of Grace; unmerited favours! 15 down, eternity to go... #gratitudeatwork #gratitudeismyattitude #thankyouall #prayforme

omaonuhs's tweet photo. 15 years of Grace; unmerited favours!
15 down, eternity to go...
#gratitudeatwork
#gratitudeismyattitude
#thankyouall
#prayforme https://t.co/vvKNh91QUS

159

773

21K

Lawrence aboh @abohlarry

about 1 year ago

@UzodinmaJay Congratulations.

abohlarry retweeted

Jaypee

@JaypeeGeneral

about 1 year ago

“Either you vote for the young Nigerians to be relevant in the Nigerian political history, or you vote to be irrelevant.” —Goodluck Jonathan All the things Johnathan said about APC came to pass!