Closed $ARBE today. +42% on the position. Full exit.
The capital moved into $HSAI . Added to the position today. Current avg entry $21.07 - down 6,5%
$OUST has grown significantly from cost basis. The actual capital at work in this segment is larger - up +65%
$OUST - the dominant Western LiDAR platform.
$HSAI - the dominant Chinese LiDAR platform. #1 on each side of the world.
That's not a coincidence. This bull run taught me the same lesson: the biggest players in a sector generate the best returns with the least risk. They execute while small caps tell stories.
$2498 still pending HKEX access.
$AEVA didn't chase the pump. Still watching.
$ARBE maybe I will come back.
A few months ago I showed you why $TIGR beats $BULL in almost every metric. The BULL investors hated me.
FY2025 full year just dropped. Let's focus on numbers not believes.
📊 THE REVENUE FLIP:
Three years ago $BULL had a $117M revenue lead - it was 43% ahead of $TIGR back then...
Today it's $41M behind and the gap is widening - TIGR grew +56% vs BULL's +46%.
I won't even compare income story, because WeBull apparently invest in growth... it isn't even visible in rev growth:)
👥 CLIENT GROWTH - % vs BASE:
$BULL added 370k new accounts in 2025
- base was 4.66M - that's +8% YoY
$TIGR added 162k new accounts in 2025
- base was 1.09M - that's +15% YoY
BULL added 2x more clients in raw numbers. TIGR grew nearly 2x faster in % terms.
Each new TIGR client brings ~$49k AUM.
Each new BULL client brings ~$5k AUM.
🎯NOW ADD THE MARKET CAP:
$BULL market cap: ~$2.6B
$TIGR market cap: ~$1.3B
BULL: MC/Revenue = ~4.6x
TIGR: MC/Revenue = ~2.1x
BULL: MC/Net income = not profitable (GAAP)
TIGR: MC/Net income = ~7.6x
The market is paying 2x more for a company with:
- lower revenue
- slower % revenue growth
- slower % client growth
- 10x lower avg client value
- no profitability
FACTS.
That's the anomaly.
Same thesis as before. Stronger now.
🐯 quality over 🐂 quantity.
If you agree, a retweet would be appreciated.
Cały Sejm, z wyjątkiem Konfederacji, na stojąco klaszcze po przyjęciu projektu uchwały dla Ukrainy.
Nie byliśmy, nie jesteśmy i nigdy nie będziemy sługami narodu ukraińskiego!
A lot of people post fractals with no real foundation behind them.
Yesterday’s $TIGR vs $FUTU comparison wasn’t random.
It wasn’t just about similar regions of operation.
It was about fundamentals, capital allocation, growth rates, and institutional positioning.
These two have historically moved in strong correlation - especially during the 2020-2021 cycle.
Back in 2021, they were running almost in sync. Today?
One is clearly lagging.
But here’s the key:
It’s the price that’s lagging - not the fundamentals.
Based purely on the financial progression, the implied upside range sits between 87% and 161%.
Fractals alone mean nothing.
Fractals + fundamentals + capital structure = a thesis.
Tiger Brokers $TIGR vs Futu Holdings $FUTU
Both are Chinese-founded online brokers.
Both serve primarily Asian retail investors.
Both benefited from the same market cycle.
And in 2021… their stocks moved very similarly.
Today, the price gap is massive.
So the question is simple:
Is this valuation difference justified by fundamentals?
Let’s look at what changed since 2021 👀
$TIGR:
• Revenue: +165%
• Net income: +1,365%
• EPS: +1,115%
• Net margin: 5.6% → 30.7%
• Institutional ownership: 18.7% → 41.5%
$FUTU:
• Revenue: +260%
• Net income: +360%
• EPS: +396%
• Net margin: 39.4% → 50.4%
• Institutional ownership: 24.7% → 34.1%
Yes, FUTU grew revenue faster and runs higher margins, but TIGR dramatically outpaced FUTU in:
• profit growth
• EPS growth
• margin expansion
• institutional accumulation
The main structural difference:
FUTU reduced shares (-7.1% buyback) – boosting EPS via shareholder returns.
TIGR diluted (+20.5% shares outstanding) – adding drag, yet EPS still surged.
Even after adjusting for dilution, TIGR’s earnings power improved far more than the price suggests.
If we assume:
FUTU at $146.72 is fairly valued (~12.4x annualized EPS)
Applying a similar earnings multiple to TIGR’s $1.215 EPS gives:
→ Base fair value ≈ $15 (12.4x EPS)
→ Adjusted for growth quality & margin surge ≈ $18–21
Current price: $8.03
That implies TIGR has 87-161% upside potential to reach a comparable regional peer with a similar business model.
Z Nawrockim też bym poszedł na piwo, ale nie zaprosił.
Nie rozumiem o co niektórym chodzi. Nie należę do mafii, nie należę do sekty. Idę prosto.
Nie dam się zapisać do żadnego z waszych obozów.
A politycy powinni umieć normalnie ze sobą rozmawiać.
@SlawomirMentzen Ja widzę tutaj nadinterpretację ludzi wierzących w to co widzą a nic nie wiedzą. Pseudo głosujący na @SlawomirMentzen teraz okazują się chorągiewkami gdy tylko zobaczą jeden filmik. Nie pozdrawiam.
W skrócie - głupiego nie przekonasz, a mądremu nie musisz tłumaczyć 🙂
Imagine Elon taking over MSNBC🤯
He already runs:
- SpaceX
- Tesla
- Starlink
- Neuralink
- D. O. G. E.
$MXNBC @MXNBC_ETH actually can pump out of the blue you just don't know when 👀
I said no posting till new ATH, but fck guys we are on the edge of going parabolic! The last opportunity! Maybe the best opportunity in your life...
$FAKEAI
For those onboard: Just fasten your seatbelt and enjoy the ride!