Abortion Museum

History, science, and reality behind abortion.
What’s hidden. What’s ignored.
Truth matters.

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Monica Snyder explains her definition of abortion.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Jamelle Kelly is being charged with attempted feticide and domestic battery abuse after he secretly drugged his pregnant 17 year-old daughter with abortion pills against her wishes. Due to the gestational length of her pregnancy, the pills made her severely ill and requiring an emergency c-section.

The baby was born at 23 weeks and 1 pound. The baby remained in the NICU receiving medical attention as of June 2026.

The Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill released the following statement:

“My prayers are with this mother and her baby, now fighting for life,” Murrill said. “This terrible case shows the dangers of mifepristone and its illegal, irresponsible, and unchecked distribution in our state. We’ve challenged the Biden administration’s reckless expansion of dangerous mail-order abortion drugs with no oversight at all from a doctor. This isn’t healthcare—it’s criminal battery and attempted murder. Anyone who secretly gives abortion drugs to a woman without her knowledge will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

This case further underscores the need to return to common sense safety protocols in the distribution of mifepristone.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

This is an example of dangerous deregulation. When it comes to deadly drugs, basic regulations are common practice to keep people from abusing them. Mifepristone and misoprostole should be no exception.

[Kristan Hawkins @KristanHawkins]

A doctor posed as a 13-year-old girl with three prior C-sections, an IUD, a history of ectopic pregnancy, and blood thinner use.

She was still mailed chemical abortion pills with no medical consultation, no identity verification, and no confirmation of pregnancy.

Is even the idea of “healthcare” in the room with us?

Thank you, @AAPLOG, for exposing the truth.

https://t.co/gXq46ZUk8q

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Robert P. George is McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence and Director of the James Madison Program in American Ideals and Institutions at Princeton University. Here he speaks about embryogenesis, the start of human life.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

@LilaGraceRose And they are suing for what reason? The healthy child they have been raising for the past two years? Feels like they want a payday.

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Allan Parker submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court for the Dobbs case. In that brief, on page 22, he includes a link to a file of testimonies of women who regret their abortion.

People claim this doesn't happen.

The current count of abortion regret testimonies shared by the Justice Foundation is 4,728. Each one is different, showing women forced into abortion, coerced into abortion, given little or no infrormation about the abortion they were to receive, etc.

These voices matter as much as anyone's in this conversation.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

The California case against Abortion Pill Reversal seems to be unraveling. Meet Dr. Mitchell Creinin, UC Davis OB-GYN, the expert testifying about the safety and efficacy of APR.

At the center of his testimony is his study in which he gave pregnant women mifepristone, then randomized whether they would receive progesterone or placebo.

The study claimed it was ethical because all the women wanted abortions and would be given surgical abortions if the medications failed; however, experimenting on human lives seems grossly unethical.

Secondly, the study was flawed (was not double blind, but he claimed it was) and results were misrepresented. He claimed a patient given the APR was rushed by ambulance due to hemorrhaging. The patient walked in on her own and was not hemorrhaging. The hospital described her condition as minor vaginal bleeding. She needed no intervention, her abortion completed despite the APR.

Creinin says that the pregnancies that continued following APR don't count as successful abortion pill reversals because he believes those pregnancies would have continued anyway, but his own estimate of the percentage of pregnancies that would continue following mifepristone was only 8%. His own study showed 80% women who received APR had continuing pregnancies and none needed medical interventions, while 40% of the placebo group needed emergency surgical intervention to complete their abortions with one placebo patient requiring blood transfusions.

His results seem to be exactly the opposite of his testimony. In fact, the end of his study says, "Patients in early pregnancy who use only mifepristone may be at high risk of significant hemorrhage."

Dr Creinin's motivations are unknown, but he is vocally pro-abortion and pro-population reduction. Read more at the link below.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #abortionpillreversal

https://t.co/Y0FqyYrpRG

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

14 women signed a letter requesting Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to support the cases suing the FDA for their failure to regulate the safe distribution of abortion pills.

While that may not sound like a large number, it demonstrates a much larger movement of women who are seeking reproductive justice of their own. Each of these women has their own story about being a victim of abortion drugs.

Some of these stories include drugs mailed to boyfriends or husbands and then unknowingly placed into food or drink. One woman was forcefully coerced into taking abortion pills by her boyfriend who didn't want to be a parent.

The most alarming story is of Catherine Herring whose husband made her breakfast in bed complete with hidden abortion pills dissolved in her water. Catherine was able to use progesterone for abortion pill reversal and saved her baby, but many of these women were not so lucky.

These cases and more underscore the complications that come from allowing anyone to order the medications through the mail. Every pregnant woman now has to worry about whatever food and drink she is served.

Which is more important being safe from being secretly drugged with abortion pills or anyone having access to abortion at any time? Since COVID, women have scared into believing they need access to abortion or their lives will be ruined.

Instead this unchecked access has actually ruined lives and killed wanted children. And these women want the FDA to rethink the standards for abortion pills, requiring in-person visits and ending mail-order to start.

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Surrogacy is often a topic in the abortion debate. This week an Ontario couple sued their surrogate, two years after she gave birth to their son.

At 22 weeks, doctors diagnosed the baby with a cleft lip and the couple requested the surrogate abort. She refused to abort and sought more medical testing, which demonstrated the baby was healthy with a minor birth defect. The couple agreed to allow the pregnancy to continue at that time.

They are now suing this single mother for $600,000 for damages. She is facing a powerful legal firm with very little resources. The surrogate believes they are suing because she refused to abort and the baby isn't the perfect child the couple wanted.

Cases like these highlight the conflicts around surrogacy. Who has the right to decide if the baby is aborted or not? Who is responsible for parenting the child if the contracting parents reject it? What rights does the child have?

Have we made human beings commodities for sale? Anti-surrogacy activists ask how is this any different than trading in adult humans?

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #surrogacy

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

Do graphic images help change minds? The answer is yes, but people will argue that it's inappropriate to use abortion images in the conversation.

Why? If there is nothing wrong with abortion? If no lives were lost? If it's just a clump of cells, what could the images possibly show?

Check out the blog post on this topic.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

https://t.co/XwewT5hn5t

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

What made her shift her opinion? It was a long journey, but it started with a single fact she couldn't ignore: DNA. Listen to this pivotal moment in her journey.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #criticaltheory

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

One part of the abortion debate that doesn't get much attention is what should we do about survivors?

Survivors?

Yes, if a child survives an abortion attempt and is born alive, is that now a human who deserves care and treatment or can he or she be left to die or killed in order to "complete the abortion"?

This is not just a hypothetical question for Melissa Ohden. She survived a late-term abortion attempt and the medical staff debated what should be done.

Hear the whole story here: https://t.co/wiM2dI6viq

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #AbortionSurvivors #BornAlive

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

If abortion is about choice, what happens when the woman chooses life?

[SBA Pro-Life America @sbaprolife]

Planned Parenthood is coercive. From insisting patients must go through with abortions before they've started to financial pressure and emotional manipulation - Planned Parenthood won't allow women to change their minds.

Funding for Planned Parenthood resumed on America's 250th Independence Day. Is federal funding of abortion without your consent freedom to you?

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

My body, my choice is okay for abortions, but not for vaccines? Pro-choice people tend to be pro-vax and even supported vaccine mandates while arguing for bodily autonomy in abortion cases.

While pro-life advocates often reject the absolutism of bodily autonomy presented by abortion advocates, but accept it when it comes to vaccines.

What gives? Check out this blog post by Nathan Nobis. Link below.

Let us know what you think. Where does bodily autonomy end when your choices affect others?

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #bodilyautonomy

https://t.co/nJg2JkeA4l

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

This beautiful smile becomes haunting when you learn the story behind it.

This young woman is a casualty of a botched late-term abortion. And her mother is seeking justice.

Keisha Marie Atkins was approximately six months pregnant in January of 2017. In order to obtain an abortion, Keisha went to Southwestern Women’s Options, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Albuquerque is known for being extremely progressive in its abortion stance, not just promoting but celebrating late-term abortion access.

She died a few weeks following her appointment in February 2017.

And to add insult to injury, the medical examiner covered up her cause of death, blatantly lying about her dying from a "natural causes." The ME claimed she passed due to a pulmonary embolism, when it was obviously from sepsis following her abortion procedure. The doctors who treated her prior to her passing noted that she was septic.

This case should give us pause - If there is nothing wrong with having an abortion at any time for any reason, why did the medical examiner lie and try to cover up her true cause of death? If abortion is an acceptable choice and a purely medical decision, why do we not regulate the clinics that perform them the same way we regulate all other medical clinics? Why don't we mandate the tracking of data and outcomes?

Specifically, we should be gravely concerned that the ME was more concerned about protecting Curtis Boyd’s, the late-term abortionist, business interests than telling the truth about what happened to Keisha.

One theory is the ME was striving to protect Boyd's relationship with the University where he would provide fetal body parts and train medical students.

At the very least, this loss of life should not have happened. Something went horribly wrong, and the ME lied to protect the abortionist, not the woman.

If abortion is pro-woman, shouldn't abortions be safe? Do we care more about access to abortion than protecting women?

Shouldn't bad abortionists be held liable and lose their ability to practice?

Keisha's mother certainly thinks so.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

One part of the abortion debate that doesn't get much attention is what should we do about survivors?

Survivors?

Yes, if a child survives an abortion attempt and is born alive, is that now a human who deserves care and treatment or can he or she be left to die or killed in order to "complete the abortion"?

This is not just a hypothetical question for Melissa Ohden. She survived a late-term abortion attempt and the medical staff debated what should be done.

Hear the whole story here: https://t.co/wiM2dI6viq

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #AbortionSurvivors #BornAlive

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

@LiveAction We were just preparing a post about the case from California suing to silence Heartbeat International and RealOptions for telling women this reversal is possible!

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

One topic related to abortion is a general respect for human life. In a bizarre story out of the UK, residents have been instructed to remove their air conditioning units in the middle of a heat wave.

Why? to save the planet...

Ostensibly, to preserve life due to climate change. But, by enforcing strict non-use or removal of AC units in the middle of a summer heatwave, human lives are lost by the thousands. Looking at data from the 32 monitored countries in Europe, between 50,000 and 70,000 people die each summer from the heat, an entirely preventable issue.

So if we kill some people to promote a scientifically debatable ideology, are we trying to preserve life? Or practicing a form of eugenics or Darwinism, deciding only those who can survive brutal heat deserve to live.

Furthermore, in cities like London with high crime, residents on the first floors have to choose between circulating warm air using open windows and fans or being safe from being attacked. One resident was told because his windows are on the second floor, giving him more safety, that he had to remove his AC units, having "no justification" for the equipment.

Sacrificing one set of human lives for others instead of treating all human life as valuable is at the beating heart of the abortion debate.

So today, on the 250th celebration of our independence from Great Britain, let's all be grateful for the freedom we have to use air conditioning.

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #airconditioning

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

US Army officer Capt. Brandon Jones-Adams was sentenced to twelve years in prison on June 24, 2026 after he pled guilty to intentionally killing an unborn child, domestic violence, fraternization and conduct unbecoming of an officer.

Jones-Adams had impregnated a junior officer while they were stationed in Korea in a consensual relationship. However, once they returned to Joint base Lewis-McChord, he secretly had her ingest mifepristone (abortion pills) in order to cause an abortion of his child for whom he did not want to take responsibility.

Jones-Adams was sentence to the maximum amount of time and was dishonorably discharged from the Army. He will not be eligible for any military benefits in the future in addition to his prison time.

This case makes several important points in the abortion debate. First, having mail-order abortion pills allows these drugs to be easily accessible for predators. The fact that he secretly administered drugs with a 1 in 11 serious adverse reactions could have been deadly. She was three weeks past the ten week recommended gestational limit, which is three weeks past the pre-Covid limits, putting her at increase risks to her future fertility and life.

Secondly, many pro-life advocates want to know the ethical and moral difference between a man deciding he doesn't want parental responsibility and ending the child's life and a woman making the same decision? If she had willingly taken the pills to the father's objection, no one would have done anything to protect the child or the father's rights. While there are obvious differences, the moral and ethical questions remain: what changes about the human rights of the child in the womb when the father doesn't want the child versus when the mother doesn't want the child? Should our rights as humans be connected to the desires of someone else?

#AbortionMuseum #abortiondebate #abortionpills #mifepristone

[Abortion Museum @abortionmuseum]

@KristanHawkins @Republicans I wish I knew. Abortion should never get tax payer dollars regardless of how you feel about it. When we use tax money to pay for things, they are supposed to be for governing and protecting our citizenry, not executing innocent citizens.