This remains a work in progress — any feedback is appreciated
https://t.co/qTTgxeGZIz
and if you need a lovely escape from the world, there's more on my webpage:
https://t.co/JSBWXdXkTe
To the intersection of #EconTwitter and hiring committees — I'm on the #EconJobMarket and hoping to steal a bit of your screen time. My #JMP examines how adaptation to climate change will affect the global population distribution and its implications for welfare. (1/n)
Takeaways? It is unlikely that barriers to migration will fall under current political climates. If these barriers are too costly for the worst-hit households, the effects of climate change will be inequitable in the movement channel as well as in the ability to adapt in place.
Over the past two years, I4R partnered with Psychological Science on a large reproducibility project.
67 independent teams reproduced 64 articles published in 2024–2025, about 44% of eligible papers.
Paper: https://t.co/DolwXsQBuX
Here's what we learned 🧵
So much of America’s politics and culture revolves around crime and punishment. But the debates we’re having today — about prisons, criminality, victims and justice — are not new.
Here’s the trailer for CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN AMERICA, a new film by my colleague @LynnNovick, coming to PBS November 16.
If anyone can find a counterparty to participate at the same odds, please DM me and we may be able to include you.
Only complete party-counterparty pairs at 4:1 odds please and only stakes ≥ $10k (inflation adjusted as in the linked terms).
This week we published an article critically assessing the work of @DAcemogluMIT. In response, the Nobel prize-winning economist has robustly defended his research and core ideas. Read his letter in full: https://t.co/9LXCR6T1L3
I am still fighting the corrupt officials brought in by George Bush to rule Iraq, and my daily life is still threatened because of my defense of my people's rights.
Aside from the poor student being put on blast for the world at large, there has to be some way to turn this into a principal agent problem by stating you’d love to pay him, but it would be suboptimal to pay him on an hourly basis if you can’t verify his effort.
There is an undergrad at the @UChicago who often asks me for advice on his thesis. Of course, I give him comments in each instance. I always want to support someone using science to change the world.
I just finished a new paper that is in his area of interest and I sent it to him, ending my email with, “would love to hear your thoughts on this study.”
Within 5 minutes I had a response: “Professor List, I would love to provide comments but I will need $50 per hour for my time. Since the paper has a lot of detailed math, it will take me approximately 10 hours. I take Zelle or Venmo.”
How would you respond?