@bryan_johnson I believe in progress and pushing boundaries. But biology is a tough negotiator. Beyond 100, one system after another seems to need repairs. We can probably extend life further, but it may take a lot longer and prove much harder than today's optimists expect.
@cullenroche "Capitalism won" because Astor literally ran a fur trade monopoly and an illegal international opium operation. If your ultimate blueprint for unregulated wealth creation is a 19th-century cartel boss, we might just need some guardrails. 🚩😉
@Brian_Stoffel_@buccocapital In case you consider #SAP as a large cap🤓, two board members bought shares after Q4 earnings and stocks declining. https://t.co/sgTx1Glrz7
We’re drifting toward a dangerous idea: that might makes right.
We’ve seen this before. When the strong dominate the weak, whether in a town or on the world stage, it may look powerful at first, but over time it drags everyone down. We tried the law of the jungle in the last century, and it gave us world wars and devastating loss.
America was founded to lead by example, not by intimidation. Right is right. And how we use our strength will determine whether others see us as a partner or a threat.
@GauchoRico Seeing the 'Total Assets' breakdown is super helpful. That 27% Fixed Income anchor definitely helps you sleep at night when the Growth side goes wild! 😴💰
@McKinsey_MGI This update is seriously impressive! The standout for me is the shift from 'AI Creation' to 'AI Fluency.' We’re seeing that you don't need to build the engine to drive the car.This proves AI is no longer just a tech-sector concern,it’s a requirement for the entire workforce. 🌍💡
@emollick Fast? Yes. Decent? Absolutely. But trying to edit the text on a generated image feels like trying to fix a haircut after the barber has left the building.
@Greenbackd When Fama-French's original 3factor-model failed to explain new data,the response was to add factors, patching the system.Every new factor is less a discovery &more a retreat from a market that has already moved on.What if the very act of identifying factors makes them disappear?
That’s the startup gamble:the line between life-changing and life lesson is 1 Slack message.Being early is not the same as being rewarded.Equity isn't equity until it's liquid+loyalty isn’t always a 2-way street.
Feel free to ride rockets,just know who’s building the escape pod.
“Joining a startup is like getting on a rocket ship. No one mentions the missing seat belts.”
It’s exciting. It’s fast. Sometimes it’s rewarding. But it’s always risky.
Take Windsurf: https://t.co/Cw8NgkdWZ9
Work for years on startup dreams, skip those juicy FAANG salaries,
collect equity like golden tickets. Then… jackpot! A $3B OpenAI acquisition? Time to Zillow like a millionaire.
Except — plot twist. Google snatches the founders and execs. No deal. No payout. No house with a porch swing.
Need fast brainstorming? Pick the wild one. Need fact-checking? Go for the skeptic. Need consensus or tone? Call the diplomat. Choosing AI isn’t just about power or knowledge—it’s about matching personality to purpose.
Anthropic’s CEO claims AI hallucinates less than humans. Bold claim. Inspired by Alex’s test feeding fake Elon Musk stories to AIs, I ran my own experiment asking AIs about each other’s “personalities” and skepticism. The results? AIs behave like people, with distinct characters.
Anthropic's CEO claims AI hallucinates less than humans.
Bold statement.
So I decided to test it by feeding the same FAKE theories to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini to see which one calls me out first.
The results shocked me 🧵
ChatGPT calls Grok “provocative but fast,” while Grok says ChatGPT is “neutral but avoids controversy.” It’s not yet Mean Girls, but the shade is real. Like humans, AIs show different styles—some bold, some cautious.