This potbellied gombeen and his gang of rats need to be plastered over all social media. Everything should be done to put these IPAS building scum out of work.
White people really have no theory of mind for the kinda insane shit browns get up to when nobody is looking.
- Never as a Latina why she kisses her dad like that.
- Never ask a black dude who he lost his virginity to.
- Never ask a Hasidic about the tunnel matress.
- Never ask a Muslim why his brother has birth defects.
- Never ask an Indian about their Indiana Jones, comically evil religion.
@sk_constantine@EikeFreidank@RealChrisLangan I'm sorry, are you deliberately being stupid? This is starting to annoy me. Politely, stop with your poised false-dichotomies. That which is unintelligible in the large is not the same as that which is currently not known to some specific individual--obviously. Jeez.
They're necessarily self-dual because that's a corollary of the CTMU's goal of defining the object reality; if there's something real enough to affect reality, it is inside reality by virtue of its being real enough to affect it! This means that anything that is real has being, per the CTMU. Of course, you could assert being means something else other than relevance to CTMU-reality, but that'd be pretty stupid now wouldn't it? After all, you'd have to either mirror the CTMU or differ from it, and in the latter case, you'd certainly be incorrect due to the supertautological nature.
Here's a question you should think about: if being is not intelligible then philosophy is a bootless endeavour, as well as mathematics, physics, and science in general--and just about everything else actually. That is, if you could never assert that P(x) means that x has being, then being is not even something to which you can refer. So if ontology exists at all, it's intelligible; and unless you have a different definition of being or to be which appropriately captures all the ontological necessities, nuances, and facets, and is not already subsumed by the CTMU, then you've no ground to stand on.
Filthy Rothschild-serving scum. Whatever merit your "aristocratic" bloodline once had is far gone. But worry not, you'll get your comeuppance sooner or later.
Immediately after Jacob Rothschild Died - an exceptionally Rare Sighting of the King’s Royal Special Guard and was spotted unannounced riding through Central London.
Then there were the Loose Blood Stained Horses.
Why?
Because the Rothschilds OWN The Royal Family & they were told too.
It’s that simple.
🚨The RNLI are transferring illegal migrants onto a Border Security Command Ship in the middle of the English Channel.
This is orchestrated from the very top.
ABSOLUTELY INSANE!
EXCLUSIVE footage. Unbelievable scene. Coaches that were planned for migrants to get on in Gosport being escorted from Hampshire by a larger motorcade than what the prime minister or king would get.
This has to be seen to be believed. The money spent 🤯
This countries broken
Mass immigration from the 1960s to the present day has been nothing less than six decades of low-intensity warfare against America.
The world you see in this video no longer exists. It will get worse if we do not take drastic action now.
Not next year. Not eventually. Now.
The whole point you're missing is that your "being" and "being-defined" are actually self-dual. Stop trying to decouple epistemology and ontology. You're running a race with your shoe-laces tied from the get-go.
Look at it this way. Epistemology is about that which we can know, and that which we can know must be intelligible to us, and since intelligibility is algebraically closed, then anything that is relevant to us is intelligible to us. Even if two objects were causally related in some way, but that relation was not intelligible to us, then it would have no relevance to us; for we could never know it.
You're locked into this Kantian-introduced notion of some oxymoronic hyperreality in which noumena are floating around just waiting to manifest, but where such manifestation is wholly unknowable to us in any way--well if so, then what's the point of twirling our thumbs about them?
On a July night in Portland, Oregon, a White 30-year-old named Aaron McInnis was dropping a friend off. A man approached Aaron's car and asked if he would help check on a woman who was crying in a nearby vehicle.
Aaron agreed, and they approached a nearby SUV. That's where Aaron observed Black 23-year-old Arvoni Hayes, enraged and completely naked in the front passenger seat, and Hayes' distraught girlfriend in the driver's seat. As the couple argued, Hayes got out of the vehicle, got dressed, then dove back in and screamed at his girlfriend to drive.
Knowing the woman was clearly in danger, McInnis instinctively ran after the SUV. Suddenly, the vehicle stopped. Hayes once again exited the vehicle, but this time, he pointed a gun at Aaron McInnis, repeatedly pulled the trigger, and shot Aaron three times, killing him.
Witnesses reported hearing at least ten rounds fired, saying that Hayes “appeared to be trying to “put as many bullets into Aaron as possible.”
This transpired in 2024. The case against Hayes has just concluded (September 2026).
His conviction for pausing an ongoing crime against his girlfriend to go out of his way to shoot and kill the innocent White father of a 10-year-old son?
Manslaughter.
Yes, manslaughter. Arvoni Hayes struck a deal to have his murder charges reduced to manslaughter, and have his firearm possession charge dropped.
Hayes is required to serve a minimum of only TEN YEARS.
Which is understandable, right? I mean, we don't want him to waste ALL of his prime White-people-killing years in prison, do we? It would be a fundamental denial of basic human rights to deprive this man of his ability to kill innocent White people in the street for a protracted period of time. Credit to Multnomah County DA Nathan Vasquez for ensuring this killer gets back on the street as soon as possible.
Genuinely sickening.
As in so many cases of Black-on-White murder, not a single news agency ever published a photo of the Black killer. @NatCon2022 was the first to unearth this prison intake photo of Arvoni Hayes. No one has ever seen his mugshot from 2024, though, as Oregon law curtailed the routine publishing of mugshots so as to not “reinforce negative stereotypes of racial or ethnic groups.”
Of course.
It's not non-Whites committing disproportionate crime that's the problem.
It's not even non-Whites killing White people that's the problem.
The real problem is White people finding out what's actually happening in the world around them.
@Brendanbets1@Claudio52752289@amanda2026ie Your name has been marked, Mr. Brendan Gormely. Keep in mind as well that I am far from some "inner-city knacker" as you say. I wouldn't continue any further in your "trolling" for your own long-term safety; have a good rest of your afternoon.