addam

[addam @AddamFTB]

@FreddyLA7 It's the world's largest bas-relief sculpture.

[Senator Rand Paul @SenRandPaul]

The SAVE Act requires proof of citizenship to vote and removes illegals from voter rolls. Democrats insist on ID for banks, flights, hotels, alcohol, and even event tickets—but fight voter ID at the polls.

If IDs prevent fraud everywhere else, why not in our elections?

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Tim Walz is getting useful idiots killed in an attempt to distract from his 100 billion dollar fraud operation.

It’s obvious.

[addam @AddamFTB]

@GAFollowers Hood Rats

[SEC Numbers Guy @secnumbersguy]

Congratulations to Fernando Mendoza.

24th in passing yards IN THE COUNTRY.

ONE game with over 300 yards passing.

COMEBACK VICTORY over 3-6 Penn State.

Truly REDEFINED what it means to win the Heisman Trophy!

[Hodgetwins @hodgetwins]

Worse than we thought

[addam @AddamFTB]

@ShadowofEzra They are going to get that equality so hard.

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

Dear 50% of Americans Who Pay Federal Income Tax:

~42,000,000 people living in the USA (legally and illegally) will apparently starve if they do not get to have the money you earned with the sweat of your brow.

Now, there are three possible ways to consider that statement:

1. It's a total lie.

2. We currently have a Great Depression II and a widespread famine in America.

3. The number of people who really do need your money to have enough food to eat nutritious meals is actually much, much smaller than 42mm, and roughly 90% of the people taking those dollars from you are freeloaders who are taking what amounts to bribes from Democrats in exchange for their everlasting votes.

I think it's #3. Although #1 has merit too.

Sincerely,
A Really Fed Up Overworked Dude Who Feels Pain in the Pit of His Stomach Every Time He Has to Write a Check for a Quarterly Estimated Income Tax Payment

[addam @AddamFTB]

@Osint613 She's mentally ill.

[addam @AddamFTB]

@EndWokeness I think the more precise clinical diagnosis is psychopath. Sociopaths don't plan and manipulate. They act impulsively.

[Stephen L. Miller @redsteeze]

I've completely reversed stance on not having cameras at SCOTUS, mainly because I just want to see Alito's face every time she speaks.

[addam @AddamFTB]

@MrAndyNgo @KatieDaviscourt I love to see it! These terrorists simps need to be put in their place.

[addam @AddamFTB]

@fred_guttenberg None of this is true.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

0 AP stories on this deadly attack
0 PBS stories on this deadly attack
0 NYT stories on this deadly attack
0 NPR stories on this deadly attack
0 WSJ stories on this deadly attack
0 BBC stories on this deadly attack
0 CNN stories on this deadly attack
0 WAPO stories on this deadly attack
0 Reuters stories on this deadly attack
0 MSNBC stories on this deadIy attack

[Steve Milloy @JunkScience]

Not global. Not warming:

1. August 2025 was 0.1°F cooler than the 1991-2020 average for the US.

2. August 2025 max temps in the US were 2.3°F cooler than August 1983.

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

@wideawake_media https://t.co/gYoquO7VnF

[Tony Heller 🇺🇸 🇯🇵 @TonyClimate]

Arctic sea ice extent has increased 22% over the past 13 years. This won't be reported by @NPR @FoxNews or @CBSNews

https://t.co/XMgZjF1bRy
https://t.co/T6dl3zVHkv

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Volcanic warming & cooling fully explains any measurable changes in temperatures since 1979. In short, nothing. Nada. As for CO₂, there's no scientific basis for the UN driven campaign of hysteria, distortion & assumptions (i.e. global boiling) of anthropogenic climate change.

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

This is likely to make a lot of my former colleagues mad, but here it goes…

A significant portion of the climate science literature is nothing more than stamp collecting. By that, I mean papers that identify some tiny new “signal,” often at resolutions far above what we have in the geologic record, and then frame it as a profound discovery. A half-degree wiggle in a proxy, a minor regional anomaly in a model, or a statistical artifact dressed up as “unprecedented change”... all carefully packaged as if it tells us something decisive about global climate trajectories.

The problem isn’t just that these findings are trivial in scale compared to natural variability; it’s that they’re presented as if they overturn the past or foretell the future. When your entire record of reliable temperature measurements spans less than two centuries, and your proxies stretch back in ways riddled with uncertainty, claiming “new normals” from slivers of data is more performance than science.

Even worse, these small increments get immediately funneled into the climate-industrial complex: NGOs craft alarmist press releases, journalists inflate the uncertainty into headlines of doom, and policymakers cite the work as justification for sweeping regulations. Meanwhile, the actual uncertainties, caveats, and data limitations are buried in the supplementary material... if they’re mentioned at all.

In geology, we learned to respect the scale of Earth’s history. We worked with incomplete records, huge uncertainties, and often contradictory signals. The humility that comes from that perspective seems to have been stripped out of modern climate science. What’s left in too many cases is a conveyor belt of incremental papers, optimized for funding renewals and media attention, but divorced from the kind of hard-nosed skepticism that defines real science.

So yes, I know this will irritate my former colleagues. But if climate science is to regain credibility, it has to break its addiction to dressing up trivialities as existential threats.

Otherwise, we’re not doing science... we’re doing marketing.

[Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki @MatthewWielicki]

Wind & solar heat the surface more than CO₂ ever has.

Studies show:
🌬️ Wind farms warm nights by up to 0.7°C per decade
☀️ Solar plants raise temps 3–4°C at night

That’s hotter than the entire century of AGW warming.

Full piece 👇 https://t.co/PUsmwxHguQ