Addison Yang

Here for the grand reveal.

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@HamrickPaul @conor64 @walterkirn Do you think police officers in countries that don’t carry guns are unable to capture ppl without killing them?

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@HamrickPaul @conor64 @walterkirn That’s extremely tenable lol

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@CodebyNihan Agent

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@chenchenzh Reddit?

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@Plus3Happiness Similar to your caffeine tolerance to enjoy the same amount of coffee more.

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@gcochran99 What is he lying about?

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@divya_venn I find that this also arises from a sense of humility where one assumes that their take is going to be less ‘right’ than the consensus (if there is such a thing). I’m sympathetic to this idea in areas requiring technical knowledge, but even then critical thinking gets you far.

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

I've been asked a lot lately why I care so much about "fringe" ideas, like UAPs. To me, this is like asking why investors would be interested in a no-name start-up.

Even if only 1% of the "fringe" is validated, that tiny sliver of truth could change everything we think we know.

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

Anyone else feeling like the pendulum is swinging back again?

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@digijordan Thanks for responding. You may be right abt branding, but I encourage you to consider how your message may be perceived by others (especially women) now that you have such a broad audience. Your words are important and will affect many lives.

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

https://t.co/GBEozI86pB

[Rep. Anna Paulina Luna @RepLuna]

🔴 LIVE: Chairman @RepJamesComer and Congresswoman Luna Hold Press Conference to Make Major Announcement https://t.co/hM315q7fWk

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

Is @RepLuna the first sitting Congress member in recent history to make such an explicit statement about the existence of non-human intelligent life?

“…we are not alone.”

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@lesternare Lester, I’m publishing something similar with a specific focus on the UAPDA. Can I send it to you?

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@528vibes It’s a possibility for sure!

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

Hot take: this explanation is *technically* true. Notice that she specifies “the drones flying over NJ in large numbers….”

This is key.

It was never the case that *all* the ‘drones’ were UAPs (or even most!). @LueElizondo discussed this weeks ago when he explained how

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

@richgel999 It may not have been designed to last long either

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

Hot take: this explanation is *technically* true. Notice that she specifies “the drones flying over NJ in large numbers….”

This is key.

It was never the case that *all* the ‘drones’ were UAPs (or even most!). @LueElizondo discussed this weeks ago when he explained how

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

None of this makes the statement any less dissatisfying or coy. But it’s not a lie per se.

Given what we’ve seen re: transparency on other topics (JFK, MLK), maybe this is just a question of timing and not an attempt to put the toothpaste back in the tube.

One can only hope!

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

Hot take: this explanation is *technically* true. Notice that she specifies “the drones flying over NJ in large numbers….”

This is key.

It was never the case that *all* the ‘drones’ were UAPs (or even most!). @LueElizondo discussed this weeks ago when he explained how

[NewsNation @NewsNation]

Drones over New Jersey: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says the drones seen flying over New Jersey were authorized to fly by the FAA and were “not the enemy.” More: https://t.co/FPyil5EaJb

[Addison Yang @addisonkyang]

It’s quite plausible that *most* drones were FAA-authorized for “research and various other purposes” (such as collecting on UAPs). One UAP alone could trigger the launch of multiple air assets.

The Q for the WH should be: why were the drones deployed in the first place?