“Live stream the wedding, send sweets to jail, let him enjoy online… but no bail.”
The Supreme Court’s sharp remark while rejecting a prisoner’s plea to attend a wedding has now gone viral. ⚖️📺🍬
The court made it clear — emotions apart, the law comes first.
#SupremeCourt #India #CourtroomDrama #BreakingNews #LegalNews #IndianJudiciary #BailRejected #ViralCourtRemark #LawAndJustice #JusticeSystem #CourtUpdates #TrendingNews #LegalUpdate #IndiaNews #Judiciary
The CAA challenge is now set for final hearing:
Assam matters to be heard independently
The Court will examine issues touching Article 14, secularism, and the structure of citizenship law.
A significant constitutional moment.
#Constitution#CAA#SupremeCourtOfIndia
VIDEO | Delhi: On the Supreme Court’s order regarding the CAA, petitioner’s advocate Adeel Ahmed says, “A timeline has been set for these matters as there are a large number of claimants and petitioners from different states across India. The CJI has announced that from May 5, the petitioners will begin their arguments and have been asked to conclude them by May 6. From May 7, the respondents will present their arguments before the court. Written submissions and compilations of judgments are to be submitted within four weeks...”
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
#Delhi
⚖️ SC gives interim safeguards on #WaqfAmendmentAct2025 — but this is only the beginning.
✅ No dispossession / record tampering
✅ 3rd-party rights barred
✅ Cap on non-Muslim members
The fight ahead is long, and we continue. ✊
#SupremeCourt#WaqfAmendmentAct2025#Minority
🚨 SC on #WaqfAmendmentAct2025:
⚖️ No dispossession or record changes till Tribunal/HC decide
⚖️ No 3rd-party rights during inquiry
⚖️ Revenue officers can’t decide title
⚖️ Cap on non-Muslim members: 4 (Council), 3 (Boards)
Balanced, partial stay.
Delhi: Reacting to the Supreme Court order putting a stay on key Waqf (Amendment) Act provisions, Advocate M.R. Shamshad says, "The Supreme Court has addressed the issue and the law that was made, to a large extent regarding the protection of Waqf, has been addressed by the court. The court has mentioned four important points: first, it has limited who can be members of the Waqf Council, stating that there cannot be more than four non-Muslims..."
Thank you @PTI_News for covering this issue. The petitions against the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 raise fundamental questions of equality, religious freedom & minority rights. The Supreme Court’s forthcoming order will shape the future of Waqf governance. #SupremeCourt#Waqf
VIDEO | Delhi: Supreme Court likely to pass interim order on pleas challenging validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 today.
Adeel Ahmad, advocate for the petitioner opposing the Waqf Amendment Act, says, "The Umeed Act was brought about to amend the Waqf Act, but its provisions go against the Constitution... The primary arguments are that it is an encroachment of the fundamental right to religion and the creation of new religious institutions."
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
The challenge to the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 is about protecting constitutional rights & institutional autonomy. All eyes on the Supreme Court’s order this Monday. #Waqf#SupremeCourtHearsWaqfCase@ians_india
Noida, Uttar Pradesh: On the interim stay on certain provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act, Advocate Adil Ahmad says, "On Monday (September 15), the Supreme Court is set to deliver its decision on interim reliefs concerning the Waqf Amendment Act, also known as the UMEED Act. The matter is significant as the petitioners had demanded that the status quo be maintained, with no changes introduced..."
🚨 BREAKING: SC stays evictions in Uriamghat, Golaghat (Assam)!
Relief for hundreds of families facing demolition.
#SupremeCourt#Assam#Uriamghat#EvictionStay#RightToShelter
Disclaimer: For informational purposes only; not a solicitation or advertisement as per BCI Rules.
The petition was argued by Senior Advocates Chander Uday Singh and Rauf Rahim, with Advocate-on-Record Adeel Ahmed, assisted by Abdur Razzaq.
#SupremeCourt#Assam#Uriamghat
https://t.co/KScF9pHxRH
Honoured to contribute this op-ed to @barandbench on the Supreme Court’s bulldozer demolition verdict and what it means for constitutional accountability.
✊🏽 Due process is not a formality — it’s our first line of defence.
#SupremeCourt#BulldozerJustice#RuleOfLaw
Bulldozers and the Supreme Court's demolition verdict: Resetting the legal terrain
What began in Uttar Pradesh as “bulldozer raj” has now spread to other states, often affecting minority and marginalised communities disproportionately.
Writes Adeel Ahmed is an Advocate-on-Record at the Supreme Court of India.
Read the Column: https://t.co/vVHK8Yp08r
#SupremeCourtofIndia #RighttoProperty #illegaleviction #Bulldozeraction #BarandBench
Kudos to Fahad and the legal team — a vital intervention that brings a sigh of relief to those whose homes stood at the edge of demolition. Justice, even when delayed, must never be denied !
#BatlaHouse#DemolitionRelief#RightToShelter
VIDEO | Delhi: Here’s what petitioner counsel Fahad Khan said on Delhi High Court hearing on petition challenging Batla House demolition notice:
“These petitioners already moved to Supreme Court. The main contingent of the DDA was that, they already moved to Supreme Court. Therefore, no stay and relief can be granted. We got the stay on one condition that the petitioner who moved to Supreme Court will withdrew their petition.”
#batlahouse #SupremeCourt
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
Democracy dies in demolition drives — especially when the victims were never heard.
SC steps in to hear Batla House matter.
#BatlaHouse#PMUday#AccessToJustice
VIDEO | On SC relief regarding demolition in Jamia Nagar, MLA Amanatullah Khan (@KhanAmanatullah) says, "We got this relief from the SC, the case will be heard by regular bench in first week of July, in the meantime, it was said that the affected persons can seek for relief in PM UDAY or others. This land was protected by the Parliament in 2014, DDA is doing pick and choose, I am from that area, I am seeing the area for 40 years... We had come with the facts, some areas were regularised... DDA is doing wrong. We hope for relief in July..."
#Jamia #Demolition #AmanatullahKhan
🚨 Heard Today | The Supreme Court took up our plea challenging Assam’s ‘push-back’ deportation policy. Filed on behalf of #ABMSU, the petition exposes illegal deportations without FT orders or MEA clearance.
📽️: https://t.co/3zGH5Slvrx
#PushBackPolicy#SupremeCourt#Justice
VIDEO | Here's what Advocate Adeel Ahmed said on the Supreme Court’s order over Assam’s pushback policy:
“There was this, specific matter which has been filed, a public interest litigation by All Assam BTC Muslim Students Union...The government of Assam has interpreted things in its own way and implemented a pushback policy under which individuals - even those with pending cases before the Hon’ble Supreme Court - have been picked up and forcibly deported to no man’s land. A PIL was filed in response, and today the Hon’ble Supreme Court stated that since this involves individual cases, appropriate orders or adjudication should take place before the concerned High Court.”
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTfmBd)
🧑🏽⚖️ Appeared before the Hon’ble Supreme Court today and secured early listing next week in the Batla House demolition matter.
The fight is for those unheard—residents facing eviction without being made parties, despite decades of peaceful possession.
#PMUday#BatlaHouse
#BREAKING Plea against Demolition notice for Batla House houses and shops in Khasra numbers 277 and 279
Adv: This is against the demolition in Jamia
CJI B.R. Gavai: Go to the High Court
Adv: Court had said 15 days notice needed. But here a notice pasted and says we should evict. Notice pasted on May 26.. no hearing to us
Respected national president Shri @JPNadda ji called and asked me to delete the tweet I had posted regarding Trump asking Apple CEO Tim Cook not to manufacture in India.
I regret posting that very personal opinion of mine, as per instructions I immediately deleted it from Instagram as well. Thanks