@coventry_saint@GT_12345678910 Yes Tounekti should have been booked. However, hereโs fouls per card for the whole of the last season (rather than just a few games). With, funnily enough, St. Mirren committing more fouls per card than Celtic.
@FarvaRangers Interesting observation. On that basis, itโs also interesting that you didnโt win more games last season considering you actually received fewer bookings relative to the number of fouls committed than we did.
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky Okay, cool. I honestly don't really regularly follow or pay much attention to non-Celtic related accounts on here, so I wouldn't know if there are 'numerous' Hearts accounts that do the same. But good to know you keep up to date on all things Celtic๐
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky Btw, you are saying this - "every single decision is scrutinised to the n'th degree" - on a post that you have made where you are criticising a VAR decision in a game where your team wasn't even playing! You sound just like all these Celtic fans...๐
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky Come onnnn. Are you telling me that doesn't happen with Hearts, Rangers, Hibs, any other fans? You need to stop following so many Celtic fans on social media!
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky I directly responded to what you claimed about all Celtic fans (which was wrong). Also interesting to hear that you know so much about Celtic fans' opinions, you seem to know more than me about what we Celtic fans think! ๐
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky We got away with one in the semi-final vs. Rangers when Trusty wasn't sent off, so you can tick that one off your bucket list. You do realise you are the one talking about dodgy officials... isn't that paranoia?
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky What narrative? Do you know my opinions on VAR? I've commented on one decision that VAR showed was onside. You are choosing not to believe VAR evidence, or to believe that the evidence is false due to cheating (?). I don't feel I'm being the idiot in this situation to be honest.
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky That's not what I'm saying at all haha. I'm not talking about moving the frame back, I'm taking about the 'frame' being the same but being seen from a different viewpoint. E.g., from ahead of play, his legs appear closed, whereas behind play they appear open.
@Alonso_55_@InBloomWeTrust@ScotlandSky Hahaha. Cool, no worries! We have VAR evidence that shows it's onside, and you haven't given any actual evidence that proves otherwise, other than 'it looks offside from my TV from a different angle', but if you prefer to believe in cheating/conspiracies, fair enough! ๐
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky But in the other angle that you believe shows it is offside, you can't see if the ball has left his foot either. Either you trust VAR or you think the officials are cheating and believe in conspiracies, in which case, fair enough, we'll never agree.
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky Haha, okay, so do you think we should never believe any close offside decision, despite VAR evidence, because they could all be 'conveniently mistimed'?
@Alonso_55_@InBloomWeTrust@ScotlandSky But in the frame that VAR uses, if the camera is slightly further back, it would show Nygren's legs slightly open, as it is in your picture.
@InBloomWeTrust@Alonso_55_@ScotlandSky Genuine question: do you not believe the VAR line (or linesman who did not flag), or do you think the other angle which has no VAR line and which is behind the play is clearer evidence?