Adil Aygün

🏡🇹🇷İstanbul 📍🇦🇹 Wien🧑‍💻University of Vienna: STS 🇦🇹🇪🇺 AUGE Software & IoT

[rabitto 🇹🇷 @rabittoke]

@HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe

This thread is about what appears to be a serious case of anti-Turkish discrimination and nationality-based double standards in a Hearts of Iron IV community associated with Paradox.

A Turkish player was directly banned from the Discord while using Mustafa Kemal Atatürk — the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye — as his profile picture. He was not first politely asked to change it. The Atatürk avatar itself became the basis of the dispute.

When he challenged the ban and asked why Atatürk was supposedly unacceptable, moderators did not simply point to a neutral rule. Instead, Atatürk was described as a “controversial” figure and connected to the Armenian events of 1915, with extraordinarily serious accusations being directed at the founder of the Turkish Republic.

Turkish users then tried to defend Atatürk, challenge those historical accusations and ask why Turkish national identity was being treated differently. According to what we experienced, our responses were removed or hidden, users who objected were banned from the Discord, and the Discord was subsequently closed to new joins, preventing excluded users from returning and responding to the accusations made against them.

We then took the issue to the public Hearts of Iron IV Steam forum. There too, users complained that rebuttals were being removed or suppressed instead of being answered.

https://t.co/ipLKzEYeoy

This is no longer simply about one moderation decision.

It is about whether Turkish players, Turkish historical identity and the founder of the Turkish Republic are being subjected to a different standard from everyone else.

1/ Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is not a hate symbol.

He is the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye and the central statesman associated with the creation of the modern Turkish Republic.

An ordinary photograph of Atatürk does not inherently express hatred against Armenians, advocate violence, glorify atrocities or attack another nationality.

If a moderator wants to turn “Turkish player with an Atatürk avatar” into grounds for exclusion, the burden should be on that moderator to explain exactly what neutral rule was violated.

2/ The historical accusation being made against Atatürk is especially serious because the basic chronology does not support portraying him as the political authority directing Ottoman Armenian policy in 1915.

In 1915 Mustafa Kemal was not the Ottoman head of government, Interior Minister or the political leader controlling the central government.

He was an Ottoman military officer and commanded the 19th Division during the Gallipoli campaign. He became President of the Turkish Republic only in 1923.

Whatever position someone takes on the Armenian events, simply transferring responsibility from the Ottoman political leadership of 1915 onto Mustafa Kemal requires evidence.

3/ That distinction should not be controversial.

If @chakerathe or another moderator specifically claims that Atatürk personally organized or directed the Armenian events, then provide evidence concerning Atatürk himself.

Do not substitute:

“he was Turkish”
or
“he later became the leader of Turkey”
for evidence of responsibility for decisions made by a different political leadership in 1915.
Otherwise, Turkish users are effectively being told that their republic's founder carries collective guilt simply because he was an Ottoman officer and later became Turkey's leader.

That is precisely why this begins to look like nationality-based prejudice rather than neutral historical moderation.

4/ It is equally misleading to casually group Atatürk together with the belligerent dictators of World War II.

He was President when Hearts of Iron IV begins in 1936, but he died on 10 November 1938, before World War II began in September 1939.

He did not lead Turkey during World War II.

So treating Atatürk as though he were simply another WWII dictator requiring the same symbolic restrictions badly distorts the actual historical context.

5/ And this is a Hearts of Iron IV community.

National leaders, political ideologies and twentieth-century history are literally the subject matter of the game.

Atatürk is not some unrelated extremist symbol that Turkish users imported into a completely apolitical community.

He is one of the most important historical figures connected to the Turkey represented in the game.

That makes the decision to single out his ordinary portrait even more difficult to justify.

6/ The Armenian-events argument does not solve this problem.

I do not accept the legal characterization of the 1915 events that these moderators are attempting to impose as beyond legitimate disagreement.

Others are free to disagree with me.

But disagreement over historical or legal characterization does not establish that an Atatürk portrait is hateful imagery, nor does it establish that a Turkish user displaying Atatürk hates Armenians.

Those are separate propositions.

7/ More importantly, political recognition by governments or parliaments is not identical to a universally binding international judicial determination settling every aspect of a historical controversy for every person in every country.

The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide through both prohibited acts and the required intent to destroy a protected group in whole or in part. It does not itself constitute a judicial judgment on the events of 1915.

And the European Court of Human Rights in Perinçek v. Switzerland expressly did not decide the historical/legal classification of the 1915 events when deciding the Article 10 case.

So moderators cannot simply say “the legal question has universally been settled; therefore disagreement equals hate speech.”

8/ None of that means Discord has to host every opinion.

Discord's current rules prohibit denial of historical mass atrocities. That is Discord's private platform policy.

But Discord's same hateful-conduct policy also protects people against hatred and discrimination based on national origin, and its definition of hate imagery focuses on symbols used to promote hatred, threats, discrimination or violence.

That distinction matters enormously here.

An ordinary Atatürk portrait is not automatically transformed into hateful imagery simply because a moderator strongly disagrees with a Turkish user's interpretation of history.

9/ And this is where the anti-Turkish discrimination concern becomes impossible to ignore.

If historical figures and national symbols associated with other countries are tolerated, yet the founder of the Turkish Republic is uniquely treated as inherently offensive, then Turkish players are plainly entitled to ask:

Why are Turkish historical symbols being held to a different standard?

If Turkish users are punished for displaying a mainstream Turkish national figure while equivalent expressions of other national identities are tolerated, that is the textbook appearance of selective treatment based on nationality.

10/ Discord itself defines national origin as a protected characteristic and prohibits discrimination and prejudice based on protected characteristics.

Paradox's own published forum rules likewise prohibit expressions that are racially offensive or “in any way discriminatory,” including ethnic slurs and hate speech.

So this cannot be dismissed with:

“Turks are offended, who cares?”

If Turkish nationality is being singled out for worse treatment, that is exactly the sort of discrimination these rules claim to oppose.

11/ The moderation process afterwards makes the situation even more concerning.

We challenged the accusations.

We attempted to provide historical and legal counterarguments.

Instead of those arguments simply being answered, users involved in the objection were banned and messages were removed or hidden.

Then access to the Discord was closed to new joins, meaning those already excluded could not simply return and defend themselves against what was being said about them.

If that closure was genuinely an unrelated anti-raid or security measure, say so and provide the timeline.

Otherwise, the sequence creates the very strong appearance of moderators controlling who was allowed to participate in the argument after banning the side challenging them.

12/ Then we moved the issue to Steam.

Why?

Because if moderators are confident that their decision was fair, they should have no problem with their reasoning being publicly examined.

Yet the complaint continued: messages challenging the moderation and defending the Turkish position were removed, restricted or suppressed instead of substantively answered.

If our argument is wrong, refute it.

Deleting an argument is not a refutation.

Banning the person asking the question is not evidence.

Closing the room after removing one side does not make the remaining side correct.

13/ And no, “this is a private server; we can ban whoever we want” does not answer the accusation of discriminatory moderation.

Yes, private communities have moderation powers.

Paradox's own rules reserve broad authority to delete posts and punish users.

But the existence of that power does not establish that every use of it is fair.

A moderator can possess the power to ban someone while still applying a rule selectively or discriminatorily.

Those are completely different questions.

14/ The issue therefore is not:

“Do moderators have a ban button?”

Of course they do.

The issue is:

Was a Turkish user banned under a standard that would have been applied in the same way to a comparable user from another nationality?

Was Atatürk targeted because of an objective, consistently applied rule?

Or was a central Turkish national figure treated as inherently illegitimate in a way equivalent foreign national figures are not?

That is the question Paradox needs to answer.

15/ Calling this concern “racism” or “anti-Turkish discrimination” is not about claiming that Turkish people constitute a biological race.

The relevant issue is discrimination and hostility based on national origin and ethnic/national identity — categories explicitly recognized in Discord's own hateful-conduct framework.

When Turkish identity, Turkish historical figures or Turkish users are singled out for adverse treatment because they are Turkish, that is a nationality-based discrimination concern regardless of the semantic label someone prefers.

16/ A Turkish person using Atatürk as an avatar does not imply hostility toward Armenians.

It does not imply support for atrocities.

It does not imply racial or ethnic supremacy.

For millions of Turkish citizens, Atatürk represents the creation of their modern republic.

Automatically interpreting that symbol through the most hostile possible lens while refusing equivalent respect to Turkish historical identity is precisely the kind of treatment that makes Turkish players feel unwelcome in an allegedly international community.

17/ Nor should Turkish users be required to renounce their own interpretation of a historical controversy simply to prove that they are worthy of participating in a gaming community.

There is an enormous difference between attacking Armenian people and disagreeing over legal or historical interpretation.

A fair moderation system should be capable of distinguishing:

a historical argument
from
hatred toward an ethnic group.

If it cannot, then Turkish users are being subjected to an ideological loyalty test rather than a neutral anti-hate policy.

18/ We therefore ask @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio and @chakerathe to answer directly:
What exact written rule made an ordinary Atatürk avatar bannable?
Was the user banned specifically because the picture was Atatürk?

What evidence supports the allegation personally connecting Atatürk to the crimes moderators attributed to him?

Are equivalent historical figures from other national communities subjected to the same standard?

Why were rebuttals removed or hidden?

Why were users challenging the decision banned?

Why was the Discord subsequently closed to new joins?

And who reviews a moderator accused of applying rules discriminatorily?

19/ This is especially important for a company running an international historical game.

Turkish players are not second-class members of the HOI4 community.

We are not guests who must hide the founder of our own republic while other players freely display their national history.

We buy the game.

We support the game.

We participate in the same communities.

We deserve exactly the same treatment as everyone else.

20/ @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe

This is why we are publicly raising the issue.

If the Atatürk ban was justified, show the rule and show the evidence.

If Atatürk was accused of personal responsibility for the Armenian events, substantiate that accusation.

If posts were removed for legitimate moderation reasons, explain which rules they violated.

If the Discord was closed for unrelated security reasons, document that.

But do not subject Turkish players to a different standard, remove their ability to respond, and then dismiss their complaint.

No anti-Turkish double standards.
No nationality-based discrimination.
No collective guilt.
Same rules. Same evidence. Same standards. Same respect

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

Süvarinin modern ordularda kullanımına güzel bir örnek.

[Michael Bauer @Bundesheerbauer]

Wenn das Gelände für Fahrzeuge zu schwierig wird, übernehmen die Haflinger des #Bundesheer vom Tragtierzentrum in Hochfilzen. Dort, wo die Technik an ihre Grenzen stößt, beweisen die Haflinger ihre besonderen Stärken.

[Jensen Huang @JensenHuang]

For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter.

AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country.

Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty.

The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.

https://t.co/AUKzoQ5Ikb

[NASA @NASA]

Welcome to the Artemis Accords, Republic of Türkiye 🇹🇷

By signing the Artemis Accords, Türkiye has joined 70 other nations that have committed to the peaceful and prosperous exploration of space: https://t.co/sXqJuYoMQQ

[Luiza Jarovsky, PhD @LuizaJarovsky]

So anyone who wants to fully delete their digital footprint - including making this information unavailable to AI models - is able to do it the same way Cami Clark did?

Or is it something that is just available for the AI overlords?

We want answers.

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@eczozgurozel Gerçekten rezil bir konuşma oldu,rezil! O kadar açıklama yaptıktan sonra ben evet diyeceğim ne demek yahu!

[ppłk rez. Maciej Korowaj @Maciej_Korowaj]

POSEŁ LECHISTANU JESZCZE NIE PRZYBYŁ

O tym, co kryje się za dyplomatycznym gestem, który przetrwał 123 lata

Puste krzesło sułtana

Jest w historii stosunków polsko-tureckich zdanie, które przez ponad sto lat wypowiadane było na dworze sułtańskim z rozmysłem, a nie z niewiedzą. Przy każdej uroczystej prezentacji dyplomatów, gdy wywoływano kolejno reprezentantów mocarstw i małych królestw, padało to samo pytanie - czy przybył już poseł Lechistanu. I za każdym razem padała ta sama odpowiedź. Że nie przybył. Że jeszcze nie dotarł. I zostawiano puste krzesło.

To nie był protokolarny błąd. To był komunikat polityczny, który Wysoka Porta kierowała jednocześnie do Warszawy, której już nie było, i do Petersburga, Berlina oraz Wiednia, które Warszawę między siebie podzieliły. Komunikat brzmiał prosto - Polska istnieje, dopóki my mówimy, że istnieje.

Dawny wróg jako jedyny obrońca

Paradoks tej sytuacji jest uderzający. Imperium Osmańskie i Rzeczpospolita przez dekady toczyły ze sobą krwawe wojny - pod Cecorą, pod Chocimiem, wreszcie pod Wiedniem w 1683 roku, gdzie Jan III Sobieski rozgromił armię pod dowództwem Kara Mustafy.

A jednak to właśnie ten były wróg okazał się jedynym znaczącym mocarstwem, które odmówiło uznania wymazania Polski z map świata. Rosja, Austria i Prusy w tajnym artykule konwencji petersburskiej z 26 stycznia 1797 roku zapisały wprost, że samo imię Polski ma być na zawsze wymazane z prawa narodów. Konstantynopol zbagatelizował ten nakaz, czym narobiło sobie w Sankt Petersburgu niemało wrogów.

Konsekwencje tej decyzji były bardzo konkretne. Polska szlachta i żołnierze, którzy po klęskach kolejnych powstań tracili dach nad głową i paszport, mieli dokąd uciekać.

Imperium Osmańskie przyjmowało ich chętnie - i nie tylko z humanitarnych pobudek. Rosja wywierała stały nacisk, żądając ekstradycji emigrantów politycznych. Turcja odmawiała, częstokroć sięgając po dyplomatyczny fortel - chroniła Polaków przed wydaniem, nakłaniając ich do formalnej konwersji na islam, po czym argumentowała Rosjanom, że nie może wydać muzułmanina. Wyznanie było tu tarczą prawną, nie kwestią sumienia.

Generał, który zmienił religię, by walczyć z carem

W tej logice przyjął islam generał Józef Bem - człowiek, który bronił Lwowa i Wiednia w 1848 roku, a potem poprowadził Węgrów przeciwko Habsburgom, zanim carski korpus pod Paskiewiczem nie zdusił rewolucji.

Po klęsce Bem schronił się w Turcji, przyjął imię Murat Pasza i stanął na czele twierdzy w Aleppo. Walczył w tureckim mundurze do końca życia, które złamała malaria w grudniu 1850 roku. Do Tarnowa wrócił dopiero w 1929 - jako prochy.

Wywiad emigracyjny nad Bosforem

Jeszcze ciekawszą postacią z mojego punktu widzenia, jako byłego oficera SWW, był Michał Czajkowski, który trafił do Stambułu jako emisariusz księcia Adama Czartoryskiego z misją budowania propolskiej siatki wpływów. Przyjął imię Mehmed Sadyk Pasza, sformował oddział kozacki złożony z polskich uchodźców i poprowadził go do walki z Rosją w czasie wojny krymskiej.

Jego życie zakończyło się tragicznie - po dziesiątkach lat misji w osmańskiej służbie, stary i złamany, wrócił na Ukrainę, wyrzekł się islamu i zastrzelił się w 1886 roku. Romantyk do końca, tyle że romantyzm w tym przypadku oznaczał przede wszystkim cierpienie.

Czajkowski był jednak czymś więcej niż tylko awanturnikiem z misją. Był centralnym ogniwem rozbudowanej siatki wywiadowczej, którą zbudował jednej z moich historycznych mentorów wywiadu szczególnie tego wschodniego - Czartoryski - i którą dziś, bez przesady, można by nazwać służbami specjalnymi emigracyjnego rządu (wywiad AK narodził się ponad wiek później, ale miał dobre podstawy).

Hotel Lambert, paryska rezydencja księcia, prowadził dwie równoległe agencje: Agencję Wschodnią z centrum w Stambule i Agencję Zachodnią działającą w Europie.

Czajkowski (dziś można porównać go do współczesnego oficera wywiadu wojskowego - rezydenta) szefował tej pierwszej. Jego oficerowie i agenci działali nie tylko w samym Stambule, ale na całym Kaukazie, Bałkanach, w Persji i Afganistanie - wszędzie tam, gdzie Rosja miała żywotne interesy i gdzie można jej było zaszkodzić lub ją obserwować.

Może o jego operacjach napisze kiedyś coś więcej...

Mój historyczny mentor Czartoryski miał do tego zresztą idealne CV. Przez kilka lat był ministrem spraw zagranicznych - i tu uwaga - Rosji, a także przyjacielem cara Aleksandra I, człowiekiem który chodził po najwyższych korytarzach władzy w całej Europie.

Po klęsce powstania listopadowego, skazany zaocznie na śmierć przez ścięcie toporem, przeflancował całe to doświadczenie na działalność emigracyjną ale sprzedawczykiem był ojcem ówczesnych emigracyjnych polskich służb wywiadowczych.

Europejskie rządy traktowały Hotel Lambert jako nieformalną ambasadę nieistniejącego państwa polskiego - bo w sensie operacyjnym nią właśnie był.

W czasie wojny krymskiej Czartoryski zdołał wystawić w armii osmańskiej dwa osobne polskie oddziały kawalerii, które walczyły przeciwko Rosji pod turecką flagą.

Metodologia wywiadowcza była (i jest) dokładnie ta sama, co w służbach profesjonalnych - żywe źródła ludzkie, agenci w terenie, wpływ na decyzje obcych rządów, sabotowanie rosyjskich interesów w kilku teatrach jednocześnie. Bez Turcji nie było to możliwe.

Polak, który stworzył Turcję

Wątek ten ma jeszcze jeden wymiar, o którym mówi się rzadko. Ideologiczne fundamenty pod nowoczesną Republikę Turecką - tę, którą zbudował Atatürk - współtworzył Polak.

Konstanty Borzęcki, uczestnik powstania wielkopolskiego i rewolucji węgierskiej, po dotarciu do Turcji przyjął imię Mustafa Dżelaleddin Pasza, doszedł do stopnia generała dywizji i napisał traktat, w którym argumentował, że Turcy są europejskim narodem zdolnym do modernizacji. Ta książka bezpośrednio zainspirowała Atatürka przy budowie nowoczesnego państwa tureckiego - włącznie z ideą przyjęcia alfabetu łacińskiego. Polska myśl polityczna zapisana po turecku.

Adampol - polska wioska nad Bosforem

W 1842 roku, z inicjatywy wspomnianego wyżej Czartoryskiego, pod Stambułem powstał Adampol - dzisiaj Polonezköy.

Zamieszkali ją polscy emigranci, w tym zdezerterowani z armii carskiej żołnierze, których Turcy wykupywali z własnej niewoli tylko po to, by nie wracali do Rosji.

Wioska istnieje do dziś. To nie jest zabytek - to żywy dowód na to, że osmańska polityka wobec Polaków miała wymiar praktyczny, a nie tylko deklaratywny.

Rachunek wyrównany

Symboliczna klamra tej historii zamknęła się w 1923 roku. Polska, która odrodziła się w 1918, była jednym z pierwszych państw świata, które uznały nowo powstałą Republikę Turecką i rząd Atatürka.

23 lipca 1923 podpisano traktat przyjaźni. W geopolitycznej grze rachunki zostały wyrównane - naród, który nie uznał wymazania Polski przez 123 lata, doczekał się rewanżu dokładnie w tym momencie, gdy sam potrzebował uznania od świata.

Legenda mówi też, że przez cały ten czas w skarbcu sułtańskim przechowywano klucze do polskiej ambasady w Konstantynopolu, które w 1918 roku przekazano polskim przedstawicielom. Nie wiadomo, czy to prawda. Ale nawet gdyby była tylko legendą - mówi więcej o charakterze tej relacji niż niejeden traktat dyplomatyczny.

Pan Prezydent Nawrocki (@Nawrocki25) powołał się na to podczas konferencji z tureckim prezydentem. I miał rację - choć prawdziwa głębia tej historii jest znacznie bogatsza niż jeden dyplomatyczny gest, który politycy lubią cytować na konferencjach prasowych.

Panowie Prezydenci Polski I Turcji...

pozdrawiam i dziękuję.

[Barış Ertürk @bariserturk_]

People attacking von der Leyen’s remarks on Turkey on the grounds that

“ooh, don’t be strategically blind, we can use their military…”

or

“shut up, Erdoğan will open some corridors for us…”

is no less humiliating than the speech itself.

And no worries: if that is your only concern, I have no doubt that you will find common ground with the Turkish government whenever it serves its political survival, especially now, at a moment when it is trying to deal the final blows to Turkish democracy.

[Sophie Fullerton @florida_sophia]

Ah yes, Turkey is so radically Islamist that during Ramadan, bars, nightclubs, and restaurants are still packed. Turkey is so radical that tourists from far more conservative countries come here just for the nightlife.

As someone who has lived in Turkey for years now, I genuinely invite anyone who believes this nonsense to come see the country for themselves.

[Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський @ZelenskyyUa]

If the United States truly thinks about withdrawing from NATO, then European security will be based solely on the European Union. But not in its current form. I think that the EU is in a situation where it needs more countries.

The UK, Ukraine, Türkiye, and Norway. These are four strong countries, which are part of Europe. Together, the UK, Ukraine, and Türkiye have armies that are stronger than Russia's army. Without Ukraine and Türkiye, Europe can’t match Russia. With the four countries on board you can wrest control of the seas, have secure skies and the largest land forces.

It’s not about offense, because when Russia makes the decision to have an army of 2.5 million people by 2030, Europe has to think about security and how to preserve its independence. The UK once was a member of the EU. There are concerns about agriculture when it comes to Türkiye. But you can manage all of this if you have a really great economy. But security comes first, economy second. Not vice versa.

From an interview on The Rest Is Politics podcast (5/5).

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@NXT4EU I don’t think the relations will get improved as long as being categorised as “etc.” but yeah… good wishes. 🤗

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@hp_ayan Sensin bot, terbiyesiz...

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@TheITCloudGuy @HuggingModels I had the same thought at the beginning. If you skip the initial selection step when you open the application, and touch the select model, then you will see several downloadable models including Qwen 3.5. 🤗

[Kozan S. Erkan @KozanSErkan1]

Yankı Amiralimiz çok güzel anlatmış.
Sade, politikadan uzak neler yapabileceğimizi ve yapmamız gerekenleri doğru açıklamış.
Kendisini kutlarım.

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@jungeriansturm Bir örnek de verebilirim. Avusturya'da milis kavramı toplumda güçlü bir konuma sahiptir. İsviçre'ye benzer şekilde, burada da “tehditlere karşı sürekli hazırlık” durumu hakimdir. Bugün yayınlanan bir haberi paylaşmak isterim. https://t.co/P4oGhqL3rW

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@dr_mdemiroglu Dün de Roketsan paylaştı bunu. Sıra sıra devlete ait şirketlerde paylaşılıyor. Başka hangi şirketin reklamını yapıyorsunuz ki böyle şimdi gelmiş bu uygulamanın reklamını yapıyorsunuz?

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@dr_mdemiroglu Sayın Dr. Demiroğlu, Next Sosyal işe TUSAŞ'ın ne bağı vardır? Baykar ile yapılan ortak mühimmat atışları olsun, ortak projeler olsun paylaşırsınız, amenna... Ancak en iyi/masumane ihtimalle Türkiye'deki açık kaynak kod temelli bir girişim olan NextSosyal ne alaka gerçekten?

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@Colin_d_m If I may ask, what is the story behind the photo of Atatürk🇹🇷❤️ on the wall? 🙂

[Adil Aygün @adilayguen]

@kursadoguz @grok rica etsem Kürsad beye Özgür Özel'i güzellemek icin verdigi bu cabada ona daha yaratici fikirler sunabilir misin?